• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate the learning theory of attachment

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Outline and evaluate the learning theory of attachment (12 marks) The learning theory, or behaviourist approach, is based on the idea that we are born as blank slates -?tabula rasa?- and that we learn all our behaviour through the process of association. The theory suggests that the process of association is applied through classical and operant conditioning, and they create attachments between infant and caregiver. Firstly, operant conditioning is the idea that behaviours that produce a reward (positive reinforcement) or behaviours that will stop something unpleasant (negative reinforcement) will be repeated. For example, in 1950 Dollard and Miller came up with a process of operant conditioning that supports the idea that food is why we form attachments. ...read more.


Furthermore, classical conditioning is the idea that we learn through association with other things, or stimulus-response explanation. An example of the process is the stimulus of milk (unconditioned stimulus ? UCS) produces a response of pleasure (unconditioned response ? UCR). Before conditioning, the mother who is a neutral stimulus who provides the milk becomes associated with the milk (NS+UCS), and this still gives a pleasurable response (UCR). After the conditioning, the mother becomes a conditioned stimulus who is the source of pleasure even without milk, and this is the basis of the attachment bond. In evaluation, one criticism of the learning theory is that food may not be the main reinforcer. ...read more.


In 1964, Schaffer and Emerson conducted an experiment on 60 children from Glasgow every 4 weeks. They found that babies were attached to people who were not involved in their physical care, such as fathers and that in 39% of cases the mother/caregiver was not the infants main attachment figure. This undermines the learning theory as it shows that feeding is not the only reason for attachment formation. Furthermore, Lastly, the learning theory can be seen as reductionist, as it reduces the complex nature of human behaviour down to its simplest terms. Bowlby in 1973 also reported that infants only need feeding a few times a day, but continually need emotional security that attachment figures provide. This suggests that food is not the main reason for the formation of attachments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Outline and evaluate the Learning Theory explanation of an attachment.

    These are examples of other rewards a baby may crave from the caregiver which are not features in the Learning Theory. Harry Harlow challenged the Learning Theory stating evidence that feeding has nothing to do with attachments. Harlow noticed that monkeys kept in cages showed signs of distress when they were cleaned out.

  2. It has been established that human social development depends in a fundamental way on ...

    Rutter argued it was also the length of the separation, and under what conditions the separation was done, gradually or traumatically, and how much interaction the child had with subsequent carers. He emphasised that maternal deprivation would not affect all children the same way anyway, individual temperaments would mean different reactions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work