• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate the Multi Store Model of memory.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Outline and evaluate the Multi Store Model of memory. (12 marks) Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) proposed the multi store model of memory in an attempt to explain the workings of our memory system. They proposed that memory consists of three stores, and information flows from one store to another. At each store there are constraints or limitations in terms of capacity, duration and encoding. According to the model, information in the environment first registers in the sensory store, where probably we wouldn?t even notice it. If attention is paid to it, the information flows along to the short term memory store, the short term store has a limited capacity of 7 give or take 2 items (Miller) ...read more.


It brings a criticism for the model as it does not distinguish between the different types of information we have to remember, explicit and implicit. Explicit involves information you have been asked to remember, for example for a test. Implicit involves information you learn naturally such as, in this case, names of people in your high school classes, which we do not have to rehearse so as for it to pass into our long term memory. A lot of memory research supporting the multi store model involves explicit information recall, so lacking in mundane realism as in real life we do not have to rehearse all information for it to be stored in our long term memory. ...read more.


The implication being that they are low in ecological validity and we can?t generalise the findings to real life. It is not a real life situation that we have to remember in any order a list of random words given to us. So the studies lack mundane realism and don?t represent memory in real life. A further criticism put forward by many psychologists is that it is over simplified. It fails to reflect the complexity of human memory. Short and long term memories are more complicated than this model suggests. Other explanations are needed to account for specific types of memory which the model cannot account for, for example: flashbulb memory, whereby a traumatic event occurs and victims or bystanders memories are often found to be accurate, detailed and long lasting, such as the witnesses of 9/11. The multi store model cannot explain this phenomenon. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory.

    3 star(s)

    Research evidence for the existence of a distinction between STM & LTM can be found in Glanzer & Cunitz (1966). This was an experiment in which participants were asked to recall a series of words and recall them in any order (free recall).

  2. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    There are however a number of limitations and problems to this investigation. Firstly, the words used in the investigation could have created a problem. For example there may have been generally easier words to remember at the beginning of the list than at the end.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    were also fully informed about all the ethics, to ensure the participants are aware. They were also informed that they had the right to withdraw from the experiement. The answer sheets were taken away and the participants were thanked. Results In this experiment, the Primacy and Recency effect was investigated.

  2. Explain and evaluate the three models of memory.

    But this is not the case; the working model has no limitations on the size of the central executive, whereas Miller believed that the STM could only hold 7´┐Ż2 items, the central executive does not have a capacity but it is governed by the speed of information coming into it.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    This is the contact telephone number for the college if required: 01709 828383 If you decide to participate, you will first be entered into draw. This works by writing your name onto a piece of paper. Based on your gender you will put into either of two bowls consisting of either 14 other male/female names.

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    However, when the subjects were delayed before repeating the list, this effect (the 'recency' effect) was lost. Atkinson and Shiffrin claimed that this was evidence to prove that the words at the end of the list remained in short-term memory, whilst those at the beginning had been lost due to decay.

  1. Alternatives to the multi store model of memory.

    The WM only explains how information is organised in the STM, the EB combined it to the long term. Baddeley and Hitch showed that if you two things at the same and they are both visual task as then you perform less well than if you were doing these tasks separately.

  2. Outline and evaluate the multi store model of memory.

    It also suggests that the transfer process is located in the hippocampus. However, although this case study supports the Multi-model store idea, and has much mundane realism, it is dangerous to generalise from one study to be others, and because this is a retrospective study, researchers tend to only notice information which fits their theories.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work