• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate theories on the maintenance of romantic relationships (24 Marks)

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Outline and evaluate the maintenance of romantic relationships There are two theories that can explain the maintenance of romantic relationships. The Social Exchange Theory and the Equity Theory provide useful explanations to the maintenance of relationships. The social exchange theory (SET) devised by Thibaut and Kelley argue that relationships involve the exchange of rewards and costs between two people. Examples of rewards would be affection and sharing, whereas cost might include arguments, loss of freedom and boredom. We aim to maintain a relationship by maximising rewards and minimising costs. The theory argues that we compare an existing relationship with two bench marks to see how it?s doing. The comparison level (CL) is used as a standard to judge the quality of our existing relationships. Our CL is determined by our experiences of previous relationships and our observations of others? relationships. If the profitability of our current relationships exceeds the CL, the relationship is judged as worthwhile. The comparison level for alternatives (CLA) is how people weigh the profitability of their current relationship with that of potential future relationships. ...read more.


Relationship closeness involved rewards plus costs not rewards minus costs like the theory suggests. Further research by Argyle argue that people only really begin to count the costs and monitor the relationship after they have become dissatisfied. Similarly, Duck argues that people do not keep an eye on other alternatives which are on offer and only start to consider alternatives when they become dissatisfied with their current relationship. An alternative theory is the equity theory. Equity theory devised by Walster proposes that people strive to achieve fairness in their relationships, any inequity can cause distress. Relationship satisfaction is highest when each partner feels that they give the same amount into the relationship and get the same amount of rewards from it. Inequity, when people feel that they are giving a lot & getting little out of the relationships or are giving little and getting a lot, leads to dissatisfaction & distress. There is research evidence which suggests that equitable relationships are the most satisfactory ones. Stafford & Canary found marital satisfaction to be lowest in people who considered themselves to be under-benefited and highest in those who felt they were in equitable relationships. ...read more.


This means there must be other factors that contribute to the maintenance of relationships. Also The theories has been criticised by psychologists for being deterministic by ignoring the role of free will of individuals by suggesting that we only take into account the fairness, rewards and costs and ignores our individual choices or other factors. Therefore it?s unlikely to explain the explanation into the maintenance of all romantic relationships and thus reducing the external reliability of the theories. Furthermore, they show imposed etic. They assume all cultures however we know this isn?t the case. In eastern cultures where arranged marriages are common they do not focus on costs, rewards and fairness. These theories fail to explain all of relationships. Lastly, the theories of maintenance into romantic relationships do not explain the maintenance of homosexual relationships, as homosexuals do not engage in traditional roles i.e. man and wife, and therefore the costs and rewards for them may be different and therefore doesn?t explain maintenance as a whole. In conclusion, these theories provide useful explanations to maintenance of aggression but they fail to consider all cultures and relationships and cannot explain relationship maintenance as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate research into the formation and maintenance of relationships

    3 star(s)

    and they had not escaped that state, we may associate them with a negative reinforcement, which also increases both are likely for them and the likelihood is that we could form a relationship with that person. There are problems with this model.

  2. Discuss the research into breakdown of relationships (24 marks)

    Nevertheless, model is relatable for many couples. This is due to the depth of the stages and it can also be applied to non-romantic couples, strengthening the reliability and ecological validity of the model. Despite these advantages, Lee?s model lacks scientific rigour because it relies on memories of the individuals,

  1. Discuss explanations of the maintenance of relationships

    The equity theory holds that it is inequality in relationships that has the greater potential to create dissatisfaction. People who contribute a great deal in a relationship and receive little in return would perceive inequality, as would those who receive a great deal and give little in return.

  2. Describe and evaluate two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships

    The theory then argues that when partners get to know each other well, they start to reveal more personal information about themselves and this is known as self disclosure. This then enables partners to become closer to each other and their relationship will be more rewarding.

  1. AQA A2 Psychology Unit 3 Relationships: The Formation, Maintenance And Breakdown of Romantic Relationships ...

    * Ratings of how much the participants `liked` the stranger were higher in comfortable surroundings. * The strangers had become associated with participants feelings at the time, as predicted by the theory. Criticisms of reinforcement/affect theory: * Supporting evidence lacks ecological validity - a good deal of it is lab-based using very unrealistic tasks.

  2. Discuss research into the nature of relationships in different cultures. (24 marks)

    Also, although they focused the study in collectivist cultures, they compared it to another type of marriage which allows us to see any differences. The study supports the idea that relationships differ across cultures because it investigates different types of marriages.

  1. Outline and evaluate one theory of the formation of romantic relationships. (4+8 marks)

    This is further reinforced as only one generation was used. If a few generations would have been used then there may have been another trend in the results, for example older generations would have found filter 2 more important than filter 3.

  2. Describe and evaluate two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships. (24 ...

    This supports the theory because it says that some factors are important at different times. At the beginning of the relationship communication is the key. So stage 2 filters out those who are very different to us so we are left with people that share our values, ideas and beliefs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work