Outline and evaluate two or more attempts to define abnormality.

Authors Avatar

Abnormality

Outline and evaluate two or more attempts to define abnormality

        Being ‘abnormal’ is defined as’ deviating from what is normal or usual’.  ‘Normal’, is conforming to a standard of some sort.  There are several approaches to establish the standard.  First, a standard can be defined in statistical terms – what most people are doing.  Second, the standard can be defined in social terms – what is considered socially acceptable and, therefore, what is socially deviant.  Third, we might use the standard of ‘adequate functioning’ – being able to cope with day-to-day living.  Finally, there is the concept of ideal mental health – a state of contentment that we all strive to achieve.

        Statistical infrequency is based on the idea that certain behaviours are statistically rare in the population.  This idea can be easily measured, for example, a person’s IQ’s.  Statistics are easy to pick up and can also be grouped and evaluated easily.  They also make no value judgements.  Homosexuality is not judged as wrong or unacceptable, just less statistically frequent.  On the other hand, there are many negative points to the statistical approach.  It doesn’t include any assessment of whether the statistically infrequent behaviour is desirable or not.  The approach doesn’t show how far away from the norm you need to be to be classed as abnormal.  Also, the approach doesn’t allow for difference in cultures.  Some behaviours are statistically infrequent in some cultures and not in others.  The statistical approach ignores culture and gender variation.

        Deviation from social norms is an important part of what is missing from the statistical approach to abnormality; any consideration of the impact of an individual’s behaviour on others.  Social deviants are people, who act in an apparently incomprehensible way, and therefore should be regarded as abnormal.  This approach shows desirability of behaviours for both the individual and for the whole of society. Deviance from social norms is abnormal and undesirable.  This approach though, does give a social dimension to the idea of abnormality.  However, some deviations are accepted, for example speeding, some may also be desirable just as the actions of those who spoke out against Hitler in 1939 were.  Some social norms change over time just as homosexuality and topless sunbathing did.  Something else to consider, is the situation, just as singing loudly in the shower is acceptable, but would be unacceptable in the street.  And just as the statistical approach doesn’t consider cultural variations, nor does this approach.

Join now!

Outline key features of the psychodynamic model of abnormality and consider its strengths and weaknesses

        The term ‘psychodynamic’ refers to a group of explanations that try to account for the dynamics of behaviour, or the forces that motivate it.  Freud claimed that mental illness arises out of unresolved, unconscious conflicts that form in early childhood.  Freud also claimed that the mind was split into three parts, the id, which consists of unconscious sexual and aggressive instincts.  Second is the ego, which is the rational and conscious part of the mind.  Third is the superego, which takes account of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay