• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate two or more studies relating to human altruism and/or Bystander Behaviour

Extracts from this document...


Outline and evaluate two or more studies relating to human altruism and/or Bystander Behaviour Human altruism is the idea of people performing completely selfless acts, for example helping others because they feel only empathy for them and want to assist them. However it is often argued that truly altruistic behaviour doesn't exist and there is always some egoistic motivation to help someone because you will be benefit from it in some way. Batson's Empathy Altruism Model explains altruistic behaviour as simply a consequence of empathy with someone in need. It's suggested that when coming across someone who needs your help it will lead to empathetic concern, but only if the perspective of the other person is taken so that it is understood how they feel. Batson believed that three conditions facilitate perspective taking; the first would be that the observer is attached to the victim in some way, either romantically, through family or that they are similar in a way. The second is that the observer has had a similar experience so can understand the distress the person is going through, and the final condition would be ...read more.


Many students who felt personal distress did exactly that and failed, however those claiming empathy took the test and passed, suggesting that true altruism was taking place. These studies show a difference side to human nature; that we can be selfless and altruistic, and the support studies eliminate the idea that people always help to avoid disapproval. However, all studies are contrived and can't be applied to real life situations. As well as this, participants could be performing demand characteristics as the "placebo drug" story is quite unbelievable and therefore could act how they think they're supposed to. The wider scale of altruism isn't reflected, only the short terms acts, for example continuous caring for someone can be an altruistic act and it's not shown whether the same process is involved. Batson acknowledged afterwards that empathy can be easily crushed - of those feeling empathetic concern, 86% agreed to take "mild" shocks, whereas when these were described as painful it went down to a mere 14%. It is believed by Cialdini that when we do something wrong we feel guilty about it, and this is a negative feeling so we try to reduce it. ...read more.


Once again, this research only reflects short term altruistic acts so can't be generalised. Cialidini suggested that when you feel empathy, you also feel sadness, and when manipulated separately it was found that higher levels of sadness produced more helping. Franzoi reported that adults are more likely to help in a bad mood, but in contrast to this there is plenty of evidence to suggest that people are more likely to help when they're in a good mood. Similar to Baton's research, their methods have been criticised with the use of the so called 'placebo drug', as it is hard to know whether participants believed the effects or acted how they thought they should. Overall, Batson suggested that to resolve the issue it should be concluded that people act through empathy for people that they have a strong connection with, however for others the empathy shown is only because of their feeling of personal distress. In cannot be known whether each individual is acting because of a certain feeling as each situation will be different and differences such as situation, relationship, personal emotion and reward or costs that could take place. ?? ?? ?? ?? Taya Dufall ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast two theories of Bystander Behaviour

    4 star(s)

    Latan� and Darley concluded that the presence of others can inhibit people from responding in an emergency; the more people, the slower the response. (Hogg & Vaughan 2002) In terms of evaluating Latan� and Darley's model, Schroeder et al. (1995)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate two or more theories of bystander behaviour.

    3 star(s)

    The defensive reaction of arousal occurs almost immediately after. This is the fight-or-flight response and prepares the body to take whatever course of action is decided. Piliavin et al. found that the higher the arousal level, the more likely the bystander to help.

  1. Peer reviewed

    Discuss research relating to bystander behaviour.

    4 star(s)

    When on their own participant's seeked help 100% of the time, but as the number of people present increased, participants remained seated and acted like it was not an emergency situation (mirroring the confederates behaviour). This strongly supports the idea of pluralistic ignorance as they were looking to confederates for guidance on how to shape their own behaviour.

  2. The Matching Hypothesis

    matching hypothesis as it shows that real couples have a positive correlation between their attractiveness, whereas randomly allocated couples vary in physical attractiveness and therefore don't have a positive correlation. I have circled the rogue results on the graph (see page 8).

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Third, the model is limited, because it only applies to mild negative feelings. According to this model, intense negative feelings should not lead to helping behaviour. Overall Evaluation In evaluation, both theories may in fact be right. Some people may be truly altruistic, whereas others only appear to be altruistic but are actually motivated by egoistic goals.

  2. AS Communication Studies Presentation

    I will consider proxemics in order to calculate the distance needed between myself and members of the audience, and the amount of 'territory' which accompanies this. There will be a clock positioned at the back of the classroom, enabling

  1. Discuss research evidence relating to Human Altruism and/or bystander behaviour When studying the ...

    The benefits of helping must also be taken into great consideration. A famous study relating to the arousal: cost-reward model called the 'Subway Samaritan' was carried out by Pallavin et al (1969). In this, one confederate collapsed on a New York subway train while observers recorded how many passengers offered to help.

  2. Discuss Research Relating to Bystander Behaviour.

    In the second condition, 62% go for help during the fit, 85% go for help, and the response time was ninety-three seconds on average. In the third condition, 31% respond, 62% do go for help, with an average response time of one hundred and sixty-six seconds.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work