• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate two social psychological explanations for aggression

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and evaluate two social psychological explanations for aggression While there are many different approaches in psychology, perhaps the most believable, and ultimately provable approaches to aggression come from the social psychological approach: social learning theory and deindividuation. While the two theories differ in their context, they both assert that the explanations of behaviour, in this case aggression, originate from the situational context emphasising little importance on other factors such as biology, evolution or cognitive processes. The social learning theory (SLT) approach to aggression largely originates from the somewhat infamous work of Bandura. While SLT comes under the large umbrella term of behaviourism, it goes far beyond the simple stimulus response model, explaining in depth more complex and perhaps realistic explanations for behaviour. Aggression is learned either indirectly: through observational learning and only replicated if vicarious reinforcement occurs, or directly. This is where aggressive behaviour is directly reinforced. While both are a form of operant conditioning, the direct approach parallels the ideas much closer. ...read more.

Middle

In addition, research findings are not only culturally bound but may be due to demand characteristics. It was noted after the study occurred that many of the parents told the children what to expect, consequently causing little face validity. Moreover, people are never consistently rewarded for aggression. Often, and if not in most cases they are punished, not rewarded. While media can sometimes portray certain acts as ethically ambiguous, it is rare to find these days aggressive behaviour rewarded in a mainstream way to suggest that the population are learning this behaviour through SLT. Not only does the research from Bandura, and subsequent researchers not include other motivations such as cognition or biology, but also the whole theory discounts these and fails to identify it as anything more than useless. While it is fair to say that some aggressive behaviour is vicariously learnt, for example through siblings one cannot deny that these factors are also largely influential, and if not in some cases more so than SLT. ...read more.

Conclusion

Zimbardo repeated the Milgram paradigm, where participants were either wearing a nametag (individuated) or in a hood (deindividuated). It was found that by wearing a hood, participants were much more likely to give shocks to the learner. Furthermore, Diener et al. observed the behaviour of over 1000 children on Halloween. The children were asked their name, and for those that didn't give it, rates of stealing candy or money when alone rose dramatically. This theories large fault lies in the premise that deindividuation only leads to anti-social behaviour. Through the work of Johnson & Downing, they found that in the same study, if the participant was wearing a nurses uniform, they were much less likely to shock the learner, compared to those dressed as the KKK. Conclusions therefore can be drawn that not only does the theory fail to acknowledge this, but also perhaps they are in fact drawing from social cues in their environment on how to act. This similarly applies to the setting of the research. The presence of a 'scientist' and many other factors consistently lead to the participant feeling powerless and doing it 'for the good of science' rather than having any sort of base data to generalise. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Physiological Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

This is an absolutely outstanding essay. The candidate clearly has an exceptional knowledge of social behaviour and behavioural phenomena, as well as Psychology as a whole. The essay starts off with a confident, precise introduction describing in detail the nature ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This is an absolutely outstanding essay. The candidate clearly has an exceptional knowledge of social behaviour and behavioural phenomena, as well as Psychology as a whole. The essay starts off with a confident, precise introduction describing in detail the nature of aggressive behaviour and two pioneering theories about the instance by which it is learnt and/or encouraged (SLT and deindividuation). The candidate then cites theorists and research evidence to help fortify their answers with empirical evidence for and against the two theories, taking plenty of time to precisely target the support and refutations each theories has. An excellent essay with a pleasantly rounded structure and a masterful use of psychological terminology.

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis here is fantastic. The candidate addresses both theories holistically, commenting specifically on how each theory can be supported, refuted and how well each explains behaviour. There is also an infallible understanding of both behavioural phenomena(SLT and deindividuation) which can elicit higher chances of aggressive acts due to a less stringent moral obligation to follow rules when a part of a group and simply learning aggressive acts from each other. The candidate makes a clear dissociation with biological theories for aggression and this helps their answer because more pointed and precise, and overall the analysis of each theories is sufficiently and balanced, lending to an excellent discussion of aggressive behaviour.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication is flawless, except for two instances were the word "crowd" is spelt as "crows". This is by no means a reason to detriment the essay's clarity and the excellence in written expression evident here. There is a very adept use of complex psychological terminology and a good understanding of how to effectively use it to aid precise analysis. There are no other major issues in grammar or punctuation here.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 14/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Physiological Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate psychological explanations of OCD

    3 star(s)

    This is an issue because any conclusions may not be appropriate to generalise to understand the causes of OCD, as the participants used do not reflect the behaviour of an individual who truly does have OCD, so the study lacks population validity, weakening the ability for the behavioural approach to make applications to others.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Biological Explanations of Addiction

    3 star(s)

    So most of us can get drunk overeat etc but not repeat the behaviour compulsively. This is because our Serotonin levels are stable. It is thought that individuals with low levels may not be able to exercise control. There is support for this idea, e.g.

  1. Biological Explanations Of Aggression

    Dopamine is another neurotransmitter, but this time high levels are associated with aggression. A study which supports this is one carried out on participants using antipsychotics. They were given the antipsychotics which lowered dopamine levels. It was found that aggression correlated with the dopamine levels and also decreased.

  2. Stress can be explained as the stimulus in the environment that triggers a stress ...

    BZs can be addictive & are generally limited to a maximum of 4 weeks' use. There are no side effects of biofeedback, just relaxation. This method's advantage is that it is voluntary & not invasive. * Drugs are easier to use than biofeedback: Drugs are relatively easy to prescribe & use.

  1. Biological Explanations of Aggression

    This is a problem because it ignores the human characteristic of free will. Evidence to support the role of genes in aggressive behaviour comes from Lagerspetz. He bred 25 generations of mice, choosing the most aggressive to breed together and the least aggressive to breed together.

  2. Discuss two or more psychological explanations of one eating disorder.

    -AN women have an over activity of dopamine in the basal ganglia, alters the way they interpret rewards.

  1. The major theme of Death of a Salesman, about all else, is about Dreams ...

    This is the case due to the fact that this particular dishonestly would never have taken place if only Biff understood what it meant to be an honest guy.

  2. Discuss theories of sleep

    This scientific and objective evidence greatly emphasises and provides support for Oswald?s theories of sleep. Further evidence also provides additional support for the restoration theory such as; the way patients who have suffered a brain insult will spend longer in REM for an average of 6 weeks and how babies

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work