• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

OUTLINE ONE OR MORE EXPLANATIONS OF FORGETTING IN LONG-TERM MEMORY AND CONSIDER TO WHAT EXTENT THESE ARE SUPPORTED BY PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

OUTLINE ONE OR MORE EXPLANATIONS OF FORGETTING IN LONG-TERM MEMORY AND CONSIDER TO WHAT EXTENT THESE ARE SUPPORTED BY PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH. There are three different explanations to forgetting in the long-term memory. These are; the interference theory and retrieval failure and cue-dependant forgetting. The decay theory outlined in the short-term memory section can also apply to why people forget things in the long-term memory. The interference theory explains forgetting in terms of either proactive or retroactive interference. Proactive interference is when you try and learn something new and past learning interferes whereas retroactive interference is when you try and learn something new but that interferes with past learning. ...read more.

Middle

So it may be that the interference effect may not show what is really in the memory, it was shown by the results that the participants remembered more words with a cue, this is known as cue-dependant forgetting. This therefore suggests that it is possible to recover from interference. The retrieval failure and cue-dependant forgetting explanation to forgetting in the long-term memory suggests that the reason why people forget is because they cannot access the memories that are stored. And that people can remember these things when they are given a cue, there are either external or internal cues. Abernethy did some research to support external cues or context dependant learning/forgetting. ...read more.

Conclusion

Other research on this is by Miles and Hardman who found that when people learned a list of words while on an exercise bike they remembered them better when they exercised again then when they was at rest. But does this explanation relate to everyday memory, everyday memory is more procedural. Many of the studies into cue-dependent forgetting are laboratory-based so this may affect the results and draw them further away from real life. Such as after a while remembering how to play a game like ping pong you may not remember all the rules and such but you remember most and re-learn the rest, although there is the re-learning to do cues don't explain it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    Any difference in recall will be due to chance factors. This means that any difference in the dependant variable, this being the recall amount is not due to the independent variable and that it is due to chance factors. Therefore the distraction of music has not affected the results.

  2. Discuss biological and psychological explanations of depression

    It follows from Freud's theory that individuals who experienced some major loss early in their lives should be more vulnerable than others to developing clinical depression in adult life. However, evidence suggests that early loss does not predict adult depression (Crook & Eliot, 1980), although the opposite was found by Bifulco et al (1992).

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    In both groups, the males were found to perform better at recall than the females in both groups. For group 1, the lowest number of words they were able to recall was 7, whereas for group 2 it was 5 words.

  2. Categorisation in Long-Term Memory

    Doing this allows reasonable control of extraneous variables and where the experimenter has a significant amount of control. An independent groups design was most appropriate because it prevents order effects and demand characteristics to a certain extent. There will be two groups, a control group who will be shown a

  1. This study is based on the theory of cue dependent forgetting - more specifically, ...

    It was a natural or quasi experiment with rigid control of variables in a natural setting. This experimental design was chosen as laboratory experiments lack ecological validity, and though field experiments are generally closer to reality, confounding or extraneous variables cannot be rigidly controlled, therefore concluding a change in the

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    After this event participants were required to identify the man from a set of fifty photographs. There was a considerable difference between the two sets of results- those who witnessed the man carrying a pen were 49% accurate in recognising his photograph, whilst those who witnessed the man carrying a knife were only 33% accurate.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    Previous research was done as a laboratory experiment. Repeated measures design was used because there was only one group of 8 participants; the same group is tested in two different condition. In List A, students were asked to recall at the same place where they memorise the words.

  2. Outline and evaluate 2 explanations of forgetting in Long-term memory.

    Explanation of forgetting from long term memory for interference was investigated by Baddeley, Hitch. McGeoch and McDonald. Braddeley and Hitch found problems in separating out the effects of interference and decay. They did an investigation with the help of rugby players and they were asked to recall the teams they played in the previous season.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work