Parents and the broader community often comment that children are not learning anything worthwhile if they "are just playing". Discuss.

Authors Avatar

Parents and the broader community often comment that children are not learning anything worthwhile if they “are just playing”.  Discuss.

Psychologists and educators have attested that play is undeniably part and parcel of life of a growing and developing child from infant through to becoming an adult; even as an adult, play cannot be dismissed from life.  Wrong concepts of play, cultural issues, socio-economic issues, and educational policies of a society could influence adults’ perception towards the value and purpose of play.  These would be presented to explain why parents presume that children are not learning anything worthwhile if they “are just playing”.  Conversely, play is a process where learning and development can occur while the child is engaged in playing. The rationale and implication for different forms of play with respect to the contexts for physical, socio-emotional, cognitive, creativity, and language development of the child will be highlighted to enable parents to understand that children are really learning important lessons even if they “are just playing” within an organised situation or freely on their own.

Very often, parents, teachers, and caregivers would use play as a reward or as a bribe to coax children to complete their homework or practise on their music.  They have segregated “serious work” from play and play is viewed as non-beneficial to academic advancement.  At the same time, adults spend little time playing with children because they find it a tedious and frustrating task to play with children. They perceive that play in itself serves no productive purpose and does not work towards any overt goal (Moyles, 1991, pp.10).  Nevertheless, adults feel that they need to direct and supervise children in their play activities; otherwise, the children would be learning very little or nothing when they play freely on their own.  

Broinowski (cited in Bloch and Pellegrini 1989, pp.17-19) recognises that this is where “free play” of childhood is “at risk”.  He is concerned that these children were being “hurried” to grow up and that they are growing up “without childhood”.  He points out that parents of the individualistic American society are determined to help their children be the best they can be; they spend to send their children to lessons in computers, music, swimming, reading and writing, and the list just goes on.  Parents and educators have also raised their academic expectations for their children; hence, play is considered a “luxury that their children can ill afford if they are to be successful” (Bloch and Pellegrini, 1989, pp. 28-29).   Play takes a second place after the child has attended to his “work” - enrichment activities - to make him a more successful person.  Again, there seems to be a very defining line between play and work – play, to these parents, does not contribute towards to their children’s academic development.

Join now!

However, the Russian collectivist culture has an entirely different concept towards play.  Play is “serious work” to the Russian children in the collectivist upbringing of children in Russia.   From the age of one, children are put under a regime-style of upbringing and training.  Collective play is emphasised; most play activities involve sharing and cooperation.  Role-playing in real-life situations as in taking care of baby, to train them to take on communal responsibilities such as serving at table, cleaning up, clearing snow from the driveway, and caring for animals.  Thus, children are learning something worthwhile in the name of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay