In this experiment by Bower (1978), several research participants were asked to memorise a list of words while they were in a particular emotional state. The conditions happy and sad were created by light hypnosis then memorised a list of words, after this conditions were swapped.
Bower (1978) found that participants placed in the same emotional state as they had been originally where they learned the information remembered the information better, thus human memory works in different ways from a factual objective i.e. tape recording.
This method of using two emotional conditions and testing memory was supported but looked at slightly replicating the hypothesis to proving that a happy emotional state will aid memory more as apposed to Bowers hypothesis.
Aim
An investigation to prove ones emotional state has a large effect on ones memory. One in a happy emotional state will have a better memory than someone in a sad or depressed emotional state.
Fig 1: Descriptive statistics
Fig 2:
The graph shows on average participants tend to have higher recall number in the happy music condition compared to the depressing. Individually certain participants remembered more in the depressing condition, participant 7 who scored 3 out of 10 in the happy condition and 5 out of 10 in the depressing conditioned environment.
Fig 3: Table showing measurements of central tendency
These results suggest the average number of words remembered in the happy condition was greater compared to the depressing condition. There was a greater range of words remembered in the happy condition and a more frequent number of words recalled in the happy condition. The median number of words remembered was higher in the happy condition.
Inferential Statistics:
The correctly chosen statistical test was the Mann Whitney U, as this particular experiment required a comparison to be made between two conditions.
U ≤ C (109 ≤ 27) therefore P ≤ 0.03
Thus showing my results are not statistically significant and so my alternate hypothesis is rejected (Hn) and my null hypothesis is accepted (Ha). Thus U wasn’t equal to or less than C. There was no significant difference in the number of words remembered by participants, any difference must have been due to chance.
Inferential Statistics
Mann Whitney U
Calculations for comparing the Ua and Ub results form above
Ua = 20x20 +20 (20+1)/2 – 129
Ua = 400+420/2 - 129
Ua = 400 + 210 -129
Ua = 190-129
Ua = 61
Ua = 61 = Depressing condition final result
Ub = 20x20+20 (20+1)/ 2-81
Ub = 400+420/2 - 81
Ub = 400-210 - 81
Ub = 109
Ub = 109 = Happy condition final results
Within these results the U = 109 as it is the largest test result out of both the happy and depressing results.
Descriptive Statistics
Condition 1: Happy Music
Condition 2: Depressing Music
The results indicate that a short amount of information can be remembered in a short space of time, none of the participants remembered all ten words and most only remembered 5. This supports the experiment by Bower that the human mind works differently to a tape recorder when remembering things and that not all human beings minds work in the same way in reference to memory recall.
After carrying out the Man Whitney U test it was discovered that the alternate hypothesis was disproved therefore the null hypothesis was proved ‘there will be no significant difference in the number of words remembered by participants in each condition, any difference will be due to chance’.
Possibilities for these chances included extraneous variables unable to be controlled. If participants tested didn’t consider the particular music played to them depressing or happy, it is difficult to decide what is depressing or happy, there are issues with individual differences. The laboratory experiment’s design suffers from low ecological validity as participants are removed from their natural surroundings and may act differently. This leads to problems with demand characteristics; participant may believe they had to score particularly high or low on the number of words remembered.
The Participants for this experiment may have had different memory abilities to each other affecting results. Participants may also have not taken the experiment seriously or by being lazy choosing not to remember the words as they usually would for an exam. Some participants may have generally enjoyed one song more than another regardless of whether it was depressing or happy thus remembered words from that condition.
The sample used 20 participants which was slightly too small for a whole 6th form population of 650 thus making the results difficult to generalise specially considering these participants were 16 and 17 year old students thus the sample doesn’t represent the rest of society.
More controls could have been passed by carrying out a questionnaire prior to experiment in order to use participants of similar abilities to memories the words, causing less differentiation. The study could have been improved by carrying out a pilot test to counteract any problems that may have been encountered in the proper test.
The only ethical guideline breeched was possible psychological problems participants feeling slightly embarrassed if they didn’t receive a high score compared to others, leading to, a person lacking confidence, chances are low.
Future research could include looking at other ways of creating the conditions. One could also look at other factors effecting memory for example a lack of food or an increase in caffeine into ones diet.
The aim of this experiment was to investigate into how or if ones emotional state has an effect on ones memory a happy emotional state and a sad or depressed emotional state. A quota sample of 20 boys and girls aged 16 and 17 was used. The procedure was a lab experiment in which each participant was placed in either a depressing or happy condition via listening to music either up beat or depressing genres; these participants were then to see how many words they could recall out of 10. An Independent Measures Design allowed the data to be subjected to a Mann Whitney U test. The results were insignificant at the 0.05% level, resulting in the Null Hypothesis being accepted where U=109 and C= 27.
Bower.G (1978). Cited in: Haynes N. Foundations of Psychology,
Kalat.JW (1998). Cited in: Haynes N. Foundations of Psychology,
Abstract 1
Background/Aim 2
Hypothesis 4
Methodology 5
Results 7
Discussion 9
Appendices
Appendix 1 11
Appendix 2 13
Appendix 3 14
References 15
Appendix 1……………………….. Inferential Statistics
Appendix 2……….…………..…..Descriptive Statistics
Appendix 3…………………….Informed Consent Form
Appendix 3
The aim of this study is to prove ones emotional state has a large effect on ones memory; in this case someone in a happy emotional state will have a better memory than someone in a sad or depressed emotional state.
As a participant you should know when carrying out the experiment:
- You have the right to withdraw at anytime from this experiment, with your results removed.
- There will be no pressure to complete the experiment.
- Your name will be kept totally confidential. Your Gender will only be recorded for the purposes of this experiment.
- You will receive a briefing and debriefing before and after the experiment.
- You have the right to read the completed experiment and have any information you would like to be removed taken out.
You will be required to listen to a certain type of music then asked to complete a short memory test, which asks to you remember several irrelevant words.
I agree to be part of this experiment. I have read the above and am fully aware of the aims of the experiment:
Signed…………………………………………………………….
Print Name…………………………………………………….