• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12


Extracts from this document...


The role of the frontal lobes in adaptive functioning Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 The Structure and Functional Anatomy of the Frontal Lobes 3 2.1 Figure 1. A diagrammatic representation of the brain 5 3 Luria's Model of Brain Function 5 4 The Complex Function of Frontal Lobes 6 5 No Longer En-Gage-ing; What Happens When The Frontal Lobes Go Wrong? 6 5.1 The Frontal Lobes and Personality 7 5.2 The Frontal Lobes and Executive Function / Drive 8 5.2.1 Theories of frontal lobe function 9 Working memory 9 Controlled vs Automatic processes 9 Use of Scripts 9 Guidance of Behaviour Towards a Goal 9 5.3 The Frontal Lobes and Emotion / Mood and Affect 9 5.4 The Frontal Lobes and Self Reflectiveness 10 5.5 The Frontal Lobes and Speech, Language and Motor Symptoms 10 6 Conclusion 11 7 References 12 1 Introduction No single theory has managed to comprehensively explain front lobe functionality. Many theories exist that explain frontal lobe functionality, which focus on various aspects of functionality such as planning and ability to moderate behaviour, social behaviour, personality and emotion. The frontal lobes are complex in their functionality and only a synthesis of the various theories can begin to present a more adequate picture of the various functions of the frontal lobe, as well the importance of the various other parts of the brain that are inextricably intertwined with the frontal lobes in their functionality. "It is clear that every complex form of behaviour depends on the joint operation of several faculties located in different zones of the brain" (Luria, p. 67) The frontal lobes are described as the brain's "orchestra leader" (Martin, 1998, p. 190), which would place them at the reins of controlling effective behaviour. Damage to the frontal lobes encompasses a wide range of symptoms including deficits in executive functioning, changes in personality, emotional expression and social interaction. ...read more.


5.1 The Frontal Lobes and Personality This writer is amenable to the theory presented by Stuss, Gow and Heatherington (1992) who note the heterogeneous nature of symptoms with frontal lobe dysfunction as well as their clearly paradoxical extremes in these symptoms. They conclude that the frontal lobe is responsible for personality, which includes mood, affect and drive. They maintain that these four constructs present a comprehensive explanation of frontal lobe functionality and dysfunction. Mood is defined as the subjective internal experience, which is usually a constant internal disposition, but may change. Affect is defined as the externalised expression of mood. Drive is defined as a force which motivates human behaviour, this is not the psychodynamic term, but is better seen as "autoactivation" (Stuss & Gow., 1992, p. 350). Emotion is a term that is all inclusive of mood, affect and drive and is more cognitively orientated the experience or conscious awareness of internal feelings. Stuss & Gow (1992) define personality as the combination of qualities or characteristics that make a person unique. They note that these characteristics are stable and result in predictable behavioural responses to the external environment. Personality is inclusive of emotion or mood, affect and drive, as well as the other qualities such as self-reflectiveness. Personality maintains "a dynamic balance between internal drive, needs and desires, and internal or external forces that regulate the expression of these internal states in conformity with culturally given norms" (Stuss & Gow., 1992, p. 350). There are a variety of symptoms when the frontal lobes dysfunction that are clearly paradoxical in nature and may be a result of several factors. Firstly, the functional specificity of the different regions of the frontal lobes has not been clearly documented. Secondly, there are inadequate definitions of frontal lobe behaviour. Thirdly, the complexity of the frontal lobes relationship with other parts of the brain must be considered, they do not operate in isolation and in fact the pre-frontal cortex is the only cortical zone to receive information from all sensory regions (Stuss & Gow, p. ...read more.


6 Conclusion The writer concurs with Walsh (1991) that effective behaviour includes motivated, modifiable and appropriate behaviour that is free from disturbing internal influences such as disease and brain trauma. The frontal lobes are the part of the brain that effect such appropriate behaviour in that they control the executive functions of planning and initiating behaviour, changing the plans to be spontaneous and flexible or discontinue action in order to respond to familiar and new situations appropriately. Stuss and Gow (1992) attribute these functions to drive, and alongside mood and affect, they incorporate these three functions to define personality. They attribute frontal lobe damage to a disorder of personality, which includes an inability to be self-reflective and ascertain whether behaviour is appropriate, motivated or effective. Several other theories have described the reason and rhyme for effective behaviour. No one theory is comprehensive and a synthesis of all is necessary to explain frontal lobe anatomy and physiology. However, the frontal lobes alone cannot explain behaviour as they interact with practically every other part of the brain. While the frontal lobes might maintain executive control, they do not operate in isolation; rather it is the rich interconnection of the frontal lobes alongside other cortical structures as well as sub-cortical structures that effect efficient behaviour. It is usually by assessing damage to the frontal lobes that theorists have been able to ascertain the functionality of the frontal lobes by working retrospectively in assessing the symptoms that appear or the functioning that change or disappear with damage to the frontal lobes. Damage to the frontal lobes has variable and wide reaching consequences. The consequences are often not adequately described by looking at single sets of cognitive, emotional, social or personality symptoms. It is important to embrace an integrated approach and recognise that we cannot view certain symptoms in isolation - they are in fact entwined. It is imperative not to oversimplify the complexity of the consequences of frontal lobe damage to these areas of the brain by viewing only isolated consequences. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. What are attribution biases and when do they occur?

    For example, the description "Margaret disobeyed Frank" tends to imply that Margaret is disobedient rather than that Frank is often disobeyed. This may go some way to explaining the correspondence bias especially since most experiments ask participants to explain behaviours that are already described in verb form.

  2. whether leading questions can affect a person's memory of a question and insert an ...

    Paper-based standardised instructions (Appendix 2) related to the aim of the investigation, were used to ensure all the participants received the same instructions, this would not have been possible if the instructions were conveyed to the participants verbally and would have become an extraneous variable.

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    This is especially likely if the specific behaviour is reinforced because it increases the likelihood of the child imitating the behaviour. Imitation is also more likely if the observer identifies with the character on television e.g. same age. Research Evidence Bandura's Bobo experiment (1961)

  2. Psychology, personality & teamwork

    and also when he is captaining in the field he likes to change things to change and upset proceedings. The last two key characteristics are stable and neurotic. You would address Powell as a performer who is stable; this is just like the normal word stable in a sense.

  1. Anxiety disorders

    OCD can therefore be very disruptive to everyday life. OCD typically begins in early adulthood. Once established it can persist for many years. The number of people seeking help for OCD has increased dramatically in the last ten years. Post-traumatic stress disorder. People often develop symptoms of anxiety after experiencing a very distressing event (a trauma).

  2. Social psychology - Social Interaction Sequence

    These 150 women were the most liberal and studied whether their liberalism changed despite family pressures or not --> didn't! How people maintain attitudes * Deliberately set out to retain attitude * Seek like-minded people * People find environments that would protect their attitudes from change PERSUASION when others attempt

  1. Biological therapies for OCD

    Psychosurgery is another biological treatment for OCD, assuming that OCD is a cause of problems within the 'worry circuit' (the OFC, caudate nucleus and the thalamus), by the disconnection or removal of parts of these areas, symptoms of OCD should stop.

  2. Phantoms In The Brain

    One of the patients given a mirror box reported that they were almost instantly releieved from the cramps or spasms endured to to their phantom limb. This was explained by the Neurologists to be due to the visual input,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work