• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Problems Defining Abnormality

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Problems Defining Abnormality Defining abnormality is no easy task. There are 4 definitions discussed in Cardwell <& Flanagan (2003) and each has its merits and disadvantages. The first is statistical infrequency. Abnormality is defined in terms of the frequency any given behaviour is said to exist in a given social group. For example, foot size can be averaged so that everyone can be seen to fall within a certain size. People whose foot size is much smaller or larger fall outside the average and are therefore by definition - abnormal. This definition is suggesting that abnormal behaviour is somehow measurable, and that behaviour can be easily grouped in terms of numbers. This is not the case. There are many behaviours that would fall outside the average for the population, shoe size being one example, where a person would not be classified as abnormal just because their feet were larger or smaller than average. ...read more.

Middle

Each separate culture has its own unique set of behavioural patterns that determine that culture. For example, men in the UK don't really ever kiss each other on the cheeks, but in France, it is quite common as a form of greeting. In Arabic cultures men may often hold hands, yet it is unheard of here in England. Another way of defining abnormality is failure to function adequately. Here the focus is on the individual and his ability to cope with daily living. If an individual is unable to deal with daily life, they may become isolated, unkempt and may avoid the attention of others. Also the individual may display unusual or bizarre behaviours that others may feel uncomfortable with, for example, smearing faecal matter over themselves. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is particularly true from a cross-cultural perspective. Since behaviour is so diverse across culture, it could be argued that such criterion is inherently racist. Again, there is an element where judgment, based on set values, determines normality for everyone. These four definitions of abnormality are not on their own, all encompassing. They reflect thinking and ideas about human behaviour which may or may not be easily classified. Usually a person is considered abnormal if they fall into all the criteria and do not posses characteristics essential to be classified as normal according to Jahoda. Culture plays an important role in determining what is considered abnormal as well. All these definitions tend to be based on a white middle-class set of values that make up the Western psychiatric service, so therefore it may not be possible to account for all variations in culturally specific behaviour. End - 730 words. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Outline and Evaluate the Biological, Psychodynamic and Cognitive Explanations of Abnormality

    The psychodynamic approach is likely to be affected by cultural relativism more than the biological model, as the approach is not appropriate for all cultures, whereas the biological model is suitable for everyone. Not all cultures would consider talking therapy or ideas about the psyche to be at all accurate, whilst a greater majority (although not all)

  2. Psychological Abnormality

    Bemis (1978) proved that anorectics are 'good girls'; perfectionists who exceed in school Agovi work and are extremely well behaved and co-operative. He argued that this makes them feel that they have no choice of their own and are rather being controlled by the desires and demands of others and

  1. Describe and evaluate the concepts of abnormal behaviour When we talk about abnormal behaviour ...

    The first element of abnormal behaviour that I will be looking at is: Observer discomfort. Simply put people feel uncomfortable when they are in the company of someone who is acting abnormally. This can mean any thing from someone making to much/to little eye contact to someone rocking backward and forward laughing manically whilst wielding a knife.

  2. Consider the Problems Faced by Psychologists in the Definition of Abnormality

    Another issue facing the use of statistical infrequency is the use of fixed boundaries. The highest and lowest 2.5% of the population as shown on a normal distribution curve are defined as abnormal (in some, but not all, cases); however those approaching the boundaries (say at either 2.6% or 97.4%)

  1. Defining abnormality

    is though they may be due to a genetic defect or to life stressors. There have been numerous criticisms of this particular model in its evaluation, the first of which is entitled 'The Biochemical theory', which criticises the somatic therapies such as psychiatric treatment used to cure the mental disorders of physical causes.

  2. Definitions of Attitudes

    Attitudes affect our behaviour based on several issues. The relevance of a particular subject to an individual determines the individual's behaviour pattern. If the individual has a strong attitude about an issue, for instance, police brutality against citizens of poorer classes, he/she may take part in demonstrations or become a serious activist against such an issue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work