• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Problems Defining Abnormality

Extracts from this document...


Problems Defining Abnormality Defining abnormality is no easy task. There are 4 definitions discussed in Cardwell <& Flanagan (2003) and each has its merits and disadvantages. The first is statistical infrequency. Abnormality is defined in terms of the frequency any given behaviour is said to exist in a given social group. For example, foot size can be averaged so that everyone can be seen to fall within a certain size. People whose foot size is much smaller or larger fall outside the average and are therefore by definition - abnormal. This definition is suggesting that abnormal behaviour is somehow measurable, and that behaviour can be easily grouped in terms of numbers. This is not the case. There are many behaviours that would fall outside the average for the population, shoe size being one example, where a person would not be classified as abnormal just because their feet were larger or smaller than average. ...read more.


Each separate culture has its own unique set of behavioural patterns that determine that culture. For example, men in the UK don't really ever kiss each other on the cheeks, but in France, it is quite common as a form of greeting. In Arabic cultures men may often hold hands, yet it is unheard of here in England. Another way of defining abnormality is failure to function adequately. Here the focus is on the individual and his ability to cope with daily living. If an individual is unable to deal with daily life, they may become isolated, unkempt and may avoid the attention of others. Also the individual may display unusual or bizarre behaviours that others may feel uncomfortable with, for example, smearing faecal matter over themselves. ...read more.


This is particularly true from a cross-cultural perspective. Since behaviour is so diverse across culture, it could be argued that such criterion is inherently racist. Again, there is an element where judgment, based on set values, determines normality for everyone. These four definitions of abnormality are not on their own, all encompassing. They reflect thinking and ideas about human behaviour which may or may not be easily classified. Usually a person is considered abnormal if they fall into all the criteria and do not posses characteristics essential to be classified as normal according to Jahoda. Culture plays an important role in determining what is considered abnormal as well. All these definitions tend to be based on a white middle-class set of values that make up the Western psychiatric service, so therefore it may not be possible to account for all variations in culturally specific behaviour. End - 730 words. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Consider the Problems Faced by Psychologists in the Definition of Abnormality

    This shows the extremely high rates of 'abnormality' present in some societies. Statistical infrequency would not be an appropriate method to classify these people as their disorders are not 'infrequent'. To have a psychological disorder would appear to be the norm, and so it would be extremely hard to distinguish

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Biological, Psychodynamic and Cognitive Explanations of Abnormality

    (In one legal case of 1995, a woman decided to sue her therapist after three weeks of Prozac had benefited her more than three years of therapy)1. The psychodynamic theory is faced by issues concerning cultural and historical relativism. When Freud devised this theory it was heavily based on the client's he was working with, not people in general.

  1. Describe and evaluate the concepts of abnormal behaviour When we talk about abnormal behaviour ...

    The first element of abnormal behaviour that I will be looking at is: Observer discomfort. Simply put people feel uncomfortable when they are in the company of someone who is acting abnormally. This can mean any thing from someone making to much/to little eye contact to someone rocking backward and forward laughing manically whilst wielding a knife.

  2. Defining abnormality

    with a physiological reaction (response) in the individual. Phobias, pathological fears of objects or situations, are thought to develop in this way. For example, a person may climb to the top of a high building, and when looking down experience nausea and dizziness. This may develop into a fear of heights which is so strong that it becomes a phobia.

  1. Cross-Cultural Variations

    media which spread ideas about parenting encouraging parents across the world to nurture their children in the same way. In reference to variation within cultures, they found that that this was 1.5 times greater than variation between cultures. The strange situation was used in a study in Africa, where it

  2. Definitions of Attitudes

    shunning unsavory ones to minimize punishments and help us to realise specific goals. The knowledge function helps us to evaluate surroundings and seeks to give clarity about ideas, objects and persons. The value-expressive function serves to publicly express ourselves. From the way we dress to our religious convictions, this function helps to adopt attitudes consistent with our views.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work