• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Psychological Theories Of Crime

Extracts from this document...


Psychological Theories of Crime. Cognitive, Developmental and Personality factors associated with criminality. This essay will attempt to critically evaluate the contribution made by Cognitive, Developmental and Personality theories to our understanding of criminal behaviour. One psychoanalytical theory proposed by Freud (1923) was that all people had three components to their personality. These components were ID, which is the impulsive component. EGO known to be the rational component and the SUPEREGO this is the moral component. The ID is the only component of the personality that is present from birth. Freud believed that the ID was the most powerful element of the personality. The ID operates on the pleasure principle, seeks immediate gratification and is not restrained by reality. If the needs of the ID are not satisfied immediately, the result is anxiety or tension. If you consider babies it is evident that they are not considerate of their parents' wishes. They have no care for time, whether their parents are sleeping, eating dinner, or bathing. They will cry when they require their needs to be met. When the ID wants something, nothing else is important. The EGO is the socialized part of the personality therefore it is based on the reality principle. ...read more.


The Extraversion - Introversion and the Neuroticism - Stability are independent personality dimensions. It is therefore possible for a person to have a different combination such as Neurotic and Extravert, Neurotic and Introvert, Stable and Extravert and Stable and Introvert. The person most likely to commit crime would be the Neurotic - Extravert. This is due to the neurotic side of the personality being emotional and they are more highly motivated to reduce tension by action. The Extravert side of the personality is more likely to take risks to boost their otherwise sluggish system. Eysenck's theory recognizes the importance of the effects that both biology and environment have in shaping all behavior including criminal. Zuckerman et al (1988) found that thrill seeking could be a reaction to an excitable Central Nervous System as opposed to Extravert personality, the findings by Zuckerman et al considered other biological factors as to why people seek excitement. Eysenck considered that the environment may affect the behavior of a person, but his experiments were mainly based on biology, this could be seen as being slightly biased as his results could be manipulated to suit his theory. ...read more.


This could then lead to crimes being committed to satisfy the needs of that person. If a person was to become fixated in stage three then they would do all they could to make others approve of them. Fixation in this stage could be a valuable explanation for gang related crimes. As each member is acting in a particular way to win approval from their peers and the 'gang leader'. Kohlberg's theory contributes greatly to our understanding of criminal behavior and the ways that people develop into criminals through dysfunctional thinking. However Kohlberg does not appear to consider that moral reasoning and moral thinking are different to moral behavior. Many people think about doing one thing but consequently do the opposite. Also Kohlberg's questionnaire that contained ten moral dilemmas did not consider that people may believe they will act in a certain way if they were put in a situation, but when they are put in the situation they may act altogether differently to how they believed they would. All of the theories mentioned in this essay can contribute to our understanding of criminality. Although they may have some faults and some may have more evidence to back up their theories, they are all as equally insightful and broaden the way society looks at criminal behavior. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Preventing and Reducing Crime

    3 star(s)

    (1963) Differential Association Differential Association (DA) theory places the causation of crime to the social conditions rather than the individual. (Behaviour is learned). Early studies identified inner-city areas with high delinquency rates, which correlated with poverty, high population density and turnover and social problems. So it is argued, therefore that crime is due to social disorganisation

  2. Persuasion Theory.

    However, from the literature it seems we are once again left with the thought that the processes involved have yet to be rigorously tested as they relate to communication theory, let alone their effect on the Domino Model. "There have been relatively few rigorous tests of this assumption via path analysis or structural equation modeling" (Stephenson, Benoit, Tschida).

  1. Genetics and environment: inseparable when discussing criminality.

    One can definitely observe the correlation between serotonin and aggressiveness, more so when looking at a study by Higely et al. in 1996 that studied monkeys and found significance in such a correlation, indeed the most aggressive monkeys where those with the lowest serotonin turnover.

  2. Causes of Aggressive Behavior

    According to Aronson (2004), aggressive behavior in humans as well as some animals can be traced to an area in the brain called the amygdala. When the amygdala is electrically stimulated, it causes the organism to become violent; when that area is blocked, aggressive behavior is calmed (Aronson, 2004).

  1. Psychology of Crime

    He found that more older people had died and become dependent on other family members than a control group of those unaffected by crime. Joseph et al found that victims of crime are more likely to develop PTSD, with rape having the highest rate of 75%.

  2. Deindividuation theories.

    They therefore propose a two-factor model based on public and private self-awareness. Public self-awareness relates to a person's concerns about how they're being evaluated by others. 'Accountability cues' like anonymity leads to the individual not caring what others think (lowered public self-awareness)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work