• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18

Psychology First Impression

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Abstract The aim of the research was to carry out a similar study of Luchins(1957) which found that the first piece of information received about an individual often bears more weight ( stronger ) than information gained later so as to see whether first impression is relevant in the 21st century. The alternative hypothesis is that there will be a significant difference in the number of positive and negative ranting between the positive primacy group and the negative primacy group. This study was a field experiment with an independent groups design The independent variable was whether positive primacy story or negative primacy story given to the participant and the dependant variable was the number of positive or negative rating given to the character (Bob).On 21st June 2008 at about 12:30 pm, we went to the Chester - le-street front street, an opportunity sample of 30 participants (15 participants in each groups) 16-59 years old were used. There were two groups of participants reading either positive primacy story or negative primacy story. For positive primacy story, the character (Bob) was described as extrovert first, then introvert and for negative primacy story, Bob was introvert first, then extrovert. Afterwards they were given a questionnaire to rate Bob in terms of certain personality traits. A chi square test was used to analysis the results. The Observed value of Chi squared was T = 20 and the Critical value was 3.84 . As the observed value is higher than the critical value, the alternative hypothesis can be accepted at p less than or equal to 0.05.Therefore, it seems from the earlier research that the order in which the information is received has an impact on impression formation. Therefore, the aim of this research is to see whether the first impression is relevant in the 21st century (the first information received has a greater impact on impression formation than the second information). ...read more.

Middle

primacy story whereas another group was using the negative primacy story .We used standardised recruitment statement to ask the participants if they wished to participate in our study. If they agreed to take part, then we used standardised instructions to describe what they would do in the study. However if they rejected, we just said 'Thank you' and let then go. They read the story only once then it was taken off. They were given a questionnaires to rate Bob in terms of certain personality traits. We then debriefed the participants (using standardised debriefing statement) and gave them the right to withdraw . Discussion The aim of the experiment is to see how first impression is applied in the 21st century .The finding of this investigation shown a significant difference in the number of positive and negative rating between the positive primacy group and the negative primacy group .For positive primacy story, all of the 15 participants gave an overall positive response to what they would say Bob was .For the negative primacy story, 12 participants gave Bob an overall negative impression ,whereas 3 gave answers showing that they thought Bob was an overall positive person . The Chi Square test was significant when less than or equal to 0.05 level and the results was supported by the data collected, the observed value (20) is greater than the critical value (3.84). Thus, the alternative hypothesis will be retained. There has been much research into first impression .Since early research by Luchins [1957], he found that when questioned about a character 's behaviour after hearing a story , participants who hear the story being the positive one first will rate the person more positively than those who hear story describing the negative one first. Therefore, his study suggested that people tend to regard the first information as revealing the real person and seen as a typical of the person and we tend to give greater weight to the information we get first. ...read more.

Conclusion

Luchins, A. S. (1957) .Cited in Atkinson , R.C., and Atkinson, R.C ,Smith ,E.E. ,Bem ,D .J. and Hilgowd ,E.R. (1990) .Introduction to Psychology.(tenth edition ).London :Harcaurt Brace Jovanovich . Websites AQA is an independent company, limited by guarantee, and a charity. http://www.aqa.org.uk/Accessed on 25th June, 2008 http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~psych200/unit8/81.htm Accessed on 25th June, 2008 Aims and hypothesis It seems from the earlier research that the order in which the information is received has an impact on impression formation. Therefore, the aim of this research is to see whether the first impression is relevant in the 21st century (the first information received has a greater impact on impression formation than the second information).The hypothesis is that there will be a significant difference in the number of positive and negative rating between the positive primacy group and the negative primacy group. The null hypothesis is that there will be no significant difference the number of positive and negative rating between the positive primacy group and the negative primacy group .The study has a two tailed hypothesis with level of significant at p = 0.05. The independent variable was whether positive primacy story or negative primacy story was given to the participant and the dependant variable was number of positive or negative rating given to the character (Bob). Title First impressions Results The level in this experiment is of a nominal scale indicating a non- parametric test .Since the design was an independent groups design .Chi square was judged to be the appropriate for analysing the data .The observed value was 20,the critical value was 3.84, the degree of freedom = 1,significance is p less than or equal to 0.05 and it was a two tailed hypothesis .Since the observed value of my results is more than the critical value ,the null hypothesis must be rejected and the alternative hypothesis must be accepted. Appendices Appendix 1 = Story 1 & 2 Appendix 2 = Questionnaire Appendix 3 = Standardised recruitment statement & standardised Instructions Appendix 4 = Standardised debriefing Appendix 5 = Calculations and result tables Appendix 6 = Bar charts of results ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. An Investigation to see whether the halo effect is present when rating personality ...

    Method Design- The Independent Variable (IV) is whether participants are presented with the picture of the 'attractive' person or the 'unattractive' person before being asked to rate them on 5 different personality traits. The Dependent Variable (DV) is the overall rating by the participants given to the pictures.

  2. The matching hypothesis

    This shows a strong positive correlation. As the observed value is higher than the critical value, the alternative hypothesis is accepted, and the null hypothesis is rejected. It can be concluded that any differences in results are not due to chance alone. The hypothesis was that male and female couples would be rated as having similar

  1. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    Persons (African Americans) with limited education had to do a verbal test, 3) Persons unfamiliar with pencils had to use them even in the beta (picture test) and 4) Failures on the Alpha test were not reassigned to a more appropriate test (the beta).

  2. The Matching Hypothesis

    With the results collected we were able to carry out a correlational analysis. Apparatus/Materials Using the internet and certain dating websites we gathered a collection of pictures of real life couples and also pictures of single males and females. When collecting the pictures we had a certain criteria.

  1. Matching Hypothesis

    circumstances, personalities would change in long-term relationships to match that of the other individual. Moreland & Beach (1992) carried out a study with male workers that showed that, as they became more familiar with females they worked with, they also became more attracted to them, almost without noticing their physical attractiveness.

  2. Effect of category and hierachy on recall

    Start by reading the participants your standardised instructions; tell them that there is to be no conferring and no cheating. 5. Give the participants 5 minutes to memorise the words. 6. After the 5 minutes are up, tell the participants to lay the words face down on the floor.

  1. The aim of this practical was to attempt to replicate Harrison and Saeed,s (1977) ...

    ( Basow 1986). Davis (1990) Previous studies of attachment styles and partner choice have formulated the issues in terms of whether the attachment styles follow the similarity or complementary principles. Davis and Latty-Mann, (1987) et al, propose that the fundamental basis of partner preference is neither of these.

  2. PHISIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY

    It originates near or in the olfactory cortex and mediates emotional tone. These two systems interact and together with the prefrontal cortex which integrates information from all the areas of the brain, result in the frontal lobes being the "final collection point for information related to both the external sensory and the internal limbic (feeling)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work