• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Psychology Questions Ansewered

Extracts from this document...


The study by Rosenhan on being sane in insane places describes how a hospital rated all admissions over a three-month period on whether they were pseudo-patients. 18926. (a) What were the results of this study? The results of the study were the hospital rated 10% of its regular intake as being pseudo-patients. [2] (b) What conclusions can we draw about psychiatric diagnosis from this study? The conclusions that can be drawn are hospitals are not thorough enough in their criteria for diagnosis as persons who would otherwise have been admitted were released. It is difficult to detect the difference between sanity and insanity. [2] The study by Rosenhan (sane in insane places) broke a number of ethical guidelines. 18927. (a) Outline one way in which the hospital staff were treated unethically. The hospital staff and administration were not told that they were going to be observed by outsiders. The patients had their rights violated as they were observed by outsiders. The pseudo patients gained admission under false pretences. For the second study, the hospital were deceived as they were told pseudo patients would try to gain admission when they were not planning to do so. [2] (b) If the study had been ethical, suggest what effect this would have on the results. They would not have seen a true representation of psychiatric hospitals as the staff knowing of their presence would have reacted differently. For the second study, the study could not have occurred as it was about discovering the hospital's ability to detect insanity. [2] The study by Freud contains the following extract of a conversation between Hans and his father. 18928. Father: When the horse fell down did you think of your Daddy? Hans: Perhaps. Yes, its possible (a) What was Hans' father trying to find out with this questioning? Hans' father was trying to find out if the horse had come to symbolise him. ...read more.


and 4) Failures on the Alpha test were not reassigned to a more appropriate test (the beta). Hraba and Grant were trying to measure racial preference, awareness and identification as well as the consequences of racial preference and identification. They measured this by replicating Clark and Clark's doll test and by asking the children and their teachers the race of the child's best friend. The requests by pseudo patients were generally met with by lack of response and attention. They were typically ignored. The pseudopatients felt depersonalized and powerless. Eve White's personality was shown to be repressive while Eve Black's was regressive. Both had above average IQ's. The phrasing of the question brought about a change in speed estimate as persons logically associate a word such as smashed with greater speed than contacted. The questions provided the subjects with information since they did not experience the accident first-hand. Both adults and children among the African tribal subjects studied had difficulty perceiving depth in the pictorial material. The groups studied had high numbers of two dimensional perceiver's as opposed to three dimensional perceiver's If Psychologists find a cultural universal of behaviour, it tells us that the behaviour is a feature of all cultures. Four behaviours that can be used to identify Autism are 1)head banging, 2) rocking behaviour, 3) self biting and 4) An obsessive desire for sameness. Washoe was able to use arbitrary symbols and showed semanticity. Washoe demonstrated semanticity by being able to generate a sign such as open to different contexts other than the context in which she learnt the symbol. She demonstrated the arbitary use of symbols for example Washoe was able to sign think-doctor for psychologist. Two ethical issues raised are observing the children unknown to their parents through a one-way mirror. The children, were deliberately irritated by the experimenters, (being denied access to toys). The children were intimidated to stay in a room in stage three of the experiment. ...read more.


Loftus and Palmer looked at memory, and the influence of words on the subjects recollection. Sure problems with memory might have accounted for their faulty recollection, however there is another possible explanation. The subjects were students, and as such might have been influenced by authority, as well as the desire to see the experiment be successful. They may have caught on that the experiment was about eyewitness recollection and so inadvertently sought to make it successful. Being students they could also have been somewhat awed or intimidated by the researcher and did not want their experiment to fail and as such acted accordingly. Aside from this study, If memory could account for all our behaviour why would people consistently make the same mistakes despite past experiences. Gould commented on intelligence and how Yerkes test sought to classify Americans. The American performance on the test may have had nothing to do with intelligence. Cultural knowledge and lack of language ability, as well as unfamiliarity with testing instruments and tests could all have impacted upon the participants. None of these have anything to do with intelligence. Aside from this intelligence cannot account for all that people behave, why then would persons with high IQ's do stupid things. The three studies sought to use cognition to explain human behaviour. The other possible explanations demonstrate that cognitive processes do not provide the only possible account of behaviour. Outside of this Cognitive processes just simply cannot possibly hope to account for all human behaviour. In the study by Raine, Buchsbaum and LaCasse: Describe the type of brain scan that was used. Suggest one problem with this type of brain scan. In his study on intergroup discrimination, Tajfel suggests that belonging to one group and having awareness of another causes discrimination. Describe one way in which the boys were put in groups. Describe how Tajfel's approach may be considered to be reductionist. In the study by Schachter and Singer on emotion: Describe the participants in the study. Why is this study useful? [12] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Research Methodology - Quantitative and Qualitative methods.

    that possible * Vulnerability to response bias * People adjust their responses to give the "right" answer rather than what they truly believe 6. Styles of questions * Agreement/disagreement (Likert scale) * Multiple choice * Open-ended � Administering Questionnaires / Surveys 1. FACE TO FACE ~ directly to person a.

  2. Parkers participant observation describes The Boys everyday lives but what else does it do? ...

    He couldn't allow this to happen as he wanted the boys to behave the way that would under normal circumstances and only then would he be able to get any real results. However, as Parker became 'one' of the boys the validity of the study was in question as it

  1. whether leading questions can affect a person's memory of a question and insert an ...

    On the other hand, Bartlett's research into memory was revolutionary because he was the first person to suggest that memory was an active construction process. An eyewitness is someone who has seen someone or something occurring and can recall and bear witness to it.

  2. Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical?

    Sherif conducted two versions of this experiment: 1. Individuals were asked to estimate how far they thought the light moved, then tested them together in a group. Estimates in the group converged as they established a 'group norm'. This was close to the average of estimates they gave individually. 2.

  1. "It is clear that eyewitness testimony is entirely unreliable". To what extent does psychology ...

    the cars going when they (hit/smashed/collided/ bumped/ contacted - the five conditions) each other?" when the word 'smashed' was used the speed estimated was faster - an average of 41mph, but when the word 'hit' was used the speed estimated was slower - an average of 34mph.

  2. Philip Zimbardo is the psychologist that conducted the prison simulation experiment which was intending ...

    This contract offered 15 per day and states that everyone would be guaranteed basic living needs, the prisoners were informed that some basic civil rights would e suspended (for example, privacy). The prisoners did not have ay idea of what they should expect and weren't given any instructions on how to behave.

  1. In his 1963 study, The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram showed us that we ...

    I personally believe that while Milgram did go through his experiment very scientifically, he also possessed a bias towards the outcome of the experiment. I believe Milgram's generation still remembered the Holocaust and that this greatly affected their opinions towards the German people.

  2. Analyse the Studies into the Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony

    (Bushman, 1998). It has been suggested that the shock of witnessing a real crime effects with the processing of information. Researchers have argued that participants in the event have more accurate recall than those who are bystanders. However, other researchers have found that involvement has no measurable effect on the accuracy of recall.(Ibid)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work