• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21

Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction This coursework was based on Cognitive Psychology. Cognitive Psychologists examine internal mental processes and topics include perception, learning, memory, and forgetting. This coursework focused specifically on memory and forgetting. It is believed that there are two memory stores; short-term and long-term memory. This current research was on long-term memory (LTM) and the information that is stored in LTM is each person's knowledge of the world, their past life, and their plans for the future. Forgetting in LTM has been explained in many ways such as trace decay theory. Trace decay theory states that memories can automatically decay over time. There is little evidence to support this explanation; therefore, this theory could be questioned. Another explanation for forgetting in LTM is retrieval failure which states that forgetting occurs when information is available in LTM, but is not accessible or is not able to be "retrieved" from memory. However, there is an alternative explanation known as the interference theory which states that forgetting occurs because similar memories interfere with and disrupt one another by retroactive and proactive interference. Retroactive interference refers to new memories disrupting the recall of old memories and alternatively, proactive interference refers to old memories disrupting the recall of new memories. Jacoby et al (2001) suggested that there are two possible reasons for proactive interference. One is that there might be problems in retrieving the correct response from memory and another reason might be due to the great strength of the incorrect response learned originally such as bias or habit. Therefore, interference occurs because the correct response is too weak or because the incorrect response is too strong. In 1931, McGeoch and McDonald conducted an experiment to study interference in LTM. All participants learned a list of ten adjectives perfectly. Participants were then divided into groups to do different activities before being asked to recall the original ten adjectives. Some participants that spent 10 minutes resting had the highest recall of 4.50 adjectives on average followed by 3.68 for those who learned 3-digit numbers, 2.58 for nonsense syllables group, and 2.17 for unrelated adjectives group. ...read more.

Middle

Findings of this experiment show that the synonym group recalled in average more adjectives than other two conditions. The test results also showed that the observed value of U, 14.5, was less than the critical value of U, 27. Therefore, the findings of this experiment are unlikely to occur due to chance or random miscalculation since the probability of the resting condition and the synonym condition occurring is 5% or less. For that reason, the null hypothesis is rejected and the experimental hypothesis is accepted. The results table is generated to show the central tendency and dispersion between the resting condition and the synonym condition. The table showed that on the whole, the mean, mode, and median of the resting condition is significantly higher than the synonym condition. Moreover, the outcome of standard deviation of the synonym condition is higher than resting condition. This means that the results collected from the raw data (number of words which each participants remember) is more dispersed in the synonym condition. Relationship to background research The results of this experiment generated findings that strongly supports the results of McGeoch and McDonald. This experiment found that the number of adjectives recalled is most likely to be affected if a certain activity is occurring between the time interval of learning and time of recalling. McGeoch and McDonald examined many different activities including nonsense syllables and numbers whereas this experiment examined specifically on only three conditions. Similar to the original findings, the more similar information was fed, the more likely the recalling is to be affected. Thus, the synonym group of this research had the lowest recall rate of 6.4 average number of adjectives compared to the antonym, 7.4, and the resting condition, 8.7. The findings prove to be comparable to those of McGeoch and McDonald's with 4.50 average recalls of ten adjectives in the resting condition, 1.25 in the synonym, and 1.83 in the antonym. ...read more.

Conclusion

The study was based on a laboratory experiment and used an independent measures design. The participants were sampled using opportunity sample. The sample consisted of 30 participants and the target population was Shrewsbury International School Year 11-13. All participants were given standardized instructions and were told to learn a list of 10 adjectives. The participants in the first condition, which was the resting condition, were asked to rest for 5 minutes. The participants in the second condition, which was the synonym condition, were asked to learn another 10 adjectives that were synonyms to the original list of adjectives for five minutes. The participants in the third condition, which was the antonym condition, were asked to learn another 10 adjectives that were antonyms of the original list of adjectives for five minutes. After the 5 minutes, all participants were then asked to recall the original list of 10 adjectives by writing it down on a piece of paper. The directional hypothesis is the group of participants that rested during the 5-minute-interval would recall significantly more adjectives from the original list than those who learned the synonyms during the 5-minute-interval. The results show that the participants in the resting condition recalled an average of 8.7 adjectives, those in the synonym condition recalled an average of 6.4 adjectives (this was significant at the 0.05 level), and those in the antonym condition recalled an average of 7.4 adjectives. Therefore, the results support the directional hypothesis because the participants recalled significantly more adjectives in the resting condition than the synonym condition. As the results showed support to the hypothesis results, it can be concluded that retroactive interference do occur and the more similar the later material, the greater the interference and the higher level of forgetting. The findings of this experiment are significantly useful and can be implemented towards many aspects of learning and education. This can be applied in school and be implemented in daily teaching. People can implement this concept into learning in everyday life to prevent them from forgetting in LTM. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    This is known as interference and there are two kinds, Retroactive Interference and Proactive Interference. B Woods (04) defines Retroactive Interference; "Retroactive interference occurs when information you have received recently interferes with your ability to recall something you learned earlier."

  2. This study is based on the theory of cue dependent forgetting - more specifically, ...

    Evaluation Validity and suggestions for improving validity The validity can be questioned in terms of whether the experiment actually tested context and not state dependent memory. The classroom, as a natural environment for learning, may have produced a state of relaxation and the dining hall a state of tension, which could account for the differences in recall.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    Confounding Variables Confounding variables include the different genders of participants, their nationality, level of English languages skills, and their capability. Procedure 1. Inform consent was obtained from all participants for participating the following experiment. 2. All participants were given standardised instructions.

  2. Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using ...

    Bottom up (or stimulus driven) processing, where only one process occurs at one time, called serial processing. And with more research and investigations another theory arouse, top down processing, which suggests that your expectations can actually dominate the stimulus. So you spot spelling mistakes etc.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    During the interviewing process they were asked two misleading questions (which according to Loftus (1978) ought to have caused inaccurate recall). However, Yuille and Cutshall found that the questions did not affect the recall of the witnesses; very few of the facts were remembered inaccurately or were reconstructed by the post-event suggestion.

  2. Find out if recall of words is better when recalled in the environmental context ...

    The mental reinstatement principle is a way in to avoid the problems associated with differing environmental contexts and stressors. According to the mental reinstatement principle, the effect of changing the environment from the learning to testing stages decreases the extent to which the subjects are encouraged to mentally reinstate the

  1. An experiment to investigation the effect of sorting words by their meaning and sorting ...

    If the same participants had been used in both conditions then they would be more likely to recall more words in the second condition because they would remember them from the first condition. The independent variable of the investigation was whether the participants had to sort the words by the

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    Aversion therapy has endured much criticism in previous decades in its use in abusing patients. At a time when homosexuality was considered by some to be a mental illness, gay people were made to undergo aversion therapy for their lifestyles which included receiving electrical shocks if they became aroused by specific stimuli.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work