• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Relationship formation

Extracts from this document...


Non Contact Lesson Thursday 1st April 2010 Relationship Breakdown Outline and evaluate two theories for the formation of relationships (25 marks) A relationship is an encounter with another person or a group of people that endures over time. It happens with celebrities even though you don't meet them. Derrick (2008) discovered how these 'fake relationships' (parasocial relationships) could provide a safe route for people who have a difficult time with real interpersonal relationships. People with low self-esteem can use parasocial relationships to feel closer to their ideal selves (i.e. the person they would rather be than the person they actually are). Relationships are important to social well being. They are characterised by features including the following: responsibility, giving,, taking, rules (for e.g. you can't sleep with your friend's ex-partner) and roles (best friend, wife, daughter mother etc). There are two main theories that explain why relationships are formed. I am going to begin with the reward/need satisfaction model (Byrne and Clove, 1970) this suggests that both operant and classical conditioning play a part in relationships. This theory states that we learn to associate with people for positive and enjoyable situations even if they are not directly rewarding us in these instances. In other words, we enter a relationship that rewards us the most or give us the most pleasure. ...read more.


Participants in relationships are often more concerned with equity and fairness in rewards and demands than with the desire to maximise their own benefits. Furthermore, this model tends to focus on western cultures hence lacks ecological validity. In non -western cultures you tend to be rewarded for being like everyone else rather than individualistic so being in a relationship wouldn't be rewarding in these cultures. Hill (1972) showed that kinship bonds are very influential resilient not dependent on reinforcement. Indicating social relationships are more commonly found in these countries and show little concern for the receipt of reinforcements. In addition this theory doesn't take into account gender differences as women are more focused on the needs of others, with men it is against their 'machismo' and 'manliness', who are orientated towards the gratification of their own needs, (Lott, 1994). However it could be argued that 'meeting the needs of others' might be reinforcing in itself. Moreover, the matching hypothesis (Walster et al, 1966) suggests that physical attractiveness is the main thing we look for in a mate and that we are attracted to those that are similar to us. Further research lead to the following main theories: socially desirable individuals seek out other socially desirable individuals and matched couples tend to be more successful than unmatched couples. ...read more.


This idea that; individuals can sometimes compensate for their lack of attractiveness by offering their other desirable traits (e.g. status and money) has been termed 'complex matching' (Hatfield and Sprecher. 2009). This hypothesis doesn't take into account gender differences and Takeuchi (2006) has shown that a gender difference does exist in the degree to which physical attractiveness is valued by an opposite sex partner. Physical attractiveness of women is valued more heavily by men than that by women of men. So it has less impact on the perception of men's social desirability. In other words, women tend to be more picky than men and take high social status e.g. money and power, also certain personality traits such as kindness and generosity into account. On a good note, the matching hypothesis takes into account the roles of third parties which may form relationships such as friends, family or even dating sites. Hatfield and Sprecher (2009) suggest it is likely that these third parties would consider compatibility because they determine who would make suitable matches. For example, in traditional arranged marriages, parents may be in a better position to judge compatibility in the long term than are their children, those decisions maybe swayed be emotions or hormones (Xiaohe and Whyte 1990). In contrast, it doesn't take into account individual differences for e.g. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The matching hypothesis

    - A low quality photograph may cause bias as it may create a false image of the people and/ or person to overcome this I will only use colour photos on the same quality paper- to eliminate any possibility of bias through quality - The size of photos- if the

  2. Physiological Arousal and its Effects on Females interpretations of physical attractiveness

    Hockey * Rowing * Basketball * Volleyball * Badminton * After 30 minutes, the females were asked to take their pulse rates again and record it on the answer sheets again * The volunteers then had to rate the other picture boards * Ratings of the pictures should have increased

  1. The Matching Hypothesis

    These findings did not support the Matching hypothesis. However the study was criticised for a number of reasons. One of these reasons was the study being too artificial and irrelevant. In real life situations the majority of people do not allow others to choose their date for them.

  2. conjugal roles

    The literature I used was from the internet and from several school text books and were from non bias and bias sources from sociologists. My method of research was appropriate to my aims because I needed to work out a percentage so therefore I needed quantitative data from a questionnaire.

  1. Mate Selection and Preferences Across Decades

    Some gaps in the literature reviewed also revealed that hardly any studies specifically asked participants about personality, but rather, focused more so on attractiveness and social status instead. Future recommendations for research could include more behavioral and observational studies, combined with more modern day surveys.

  2. Matching Hypothesis

    The study will be similar to Murstein's study by means of using photographs in this study, but it necessary to carry out further research using this method as it is 35years since Murstein's experiment and things may have changed in society since resulting in changes to how people deal with relationships.

  1. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the Matching Hypothesis

    theorise that people are more likely to start a relationship with eachother if they are fairly closely matched in their ability to reward one another. As described above, physical attractiveness is one of the factors in what constitutes a reward in this context, and so this is generalised to the

  2. Describe and evaluate the theories of attraction and relationship formation.

    Men may tend to prefer women who are younger than themselves as they're thought to be more fertile (Buss 89). Wilson (1975) argues that human sexual attraction and behaviour may be explained through an understanding of 'survival efficiency'. He says it is in the 'interests' of the male to impregnate

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work