• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Relationship formation

Extracts from this document...


Non Contact Lesson Thursday 1st April 2010 Relationship Breakdown Outline and evaluate two theories for the formation of relationships (25 marks) A relationship is an encounter with another person or a group of people that endures over time. It happens with celebrities even though you don't meet them. Derrick (2008) discovered how these 'fake relationships' (parasocial relationships) could provide a safe route for people who have a difficult time with real interpersonal relationships. People with low self-esteem can use parasocial relationships to feel closer to their ideal selves (i.e. the person they would rather be than the person they actually are). Relationships are important to social well being. They are characterised by features including the following: responsibility, giving,, taking, rules (for e.g. you can't sleep with your friend's ex-partner) and roles (best friend, wife, daughter mother etc). There are two main theories that explain why relationships are formed. I am going to begin with the reward/need satisfaction model (Byrne and Clove, 1970) this suggests that both operant and classical conditioning play a part in relationships. This theory states that we learn to associate with people for positive and enjoyable situations even if they are not directly rewarding us in these instances. In other words, we enter a relationship that rewards us the most or give us the most pleasure. ...read more.


Participants in relationships are often more concerned with equity and fairness in rewards and demands than with the desire to maximise their own benefits. Furthermore, this model tends to focus on western cultures hence lacks ecological validity. In non -western cultures you tend to be rewarded for being like everyone else rather than individualistic so being in a relationship wouldn't be rewarding in these cultures. Hill (1972) showed that kinship bonds are very influential resilient not dependent on reinforcement. Indicating social relationships are more commonly found in these countries and show little concern for the receipt of reinforcements. In addition this theory doesn't take into account gender differences as women are more focused on the needs of others, with men it is against their 'machismo' and 'manliness', who are orientated towards the gratification of their own needs, (Lott, 1994). However it could be argued that 'meeting the needs of others' might be reinforcing in itself. Moreover, the matching hypothesis (Walster et al, 1966) suggests that physical attractiveness is the main thing we look for in a mate and that we are attracted to those that are similar to us. Further research lead to the following main theories: socially desirable individuals seek out other socially desirable individuals and matched couples tend to be more successful than unmatched couples. ...read more.


This idea that; individuals can sometimes compensate for their lack of attractiveness by offering their other desirable traits (e.g. status and money) has been termed 'complex matching' (Hatfield and Sprecher. 2009). This hypothesis doesn't take into account gender differences and Takeuchi (2006) has shown that a gender difference does exist in the degree to which physical attractiveness is valued by an opposite sex partner. Physical attractiveness of women is valued more heavily by men than that by women of men. So it has less impact on the perception of men's social desirability. In other words, women tend to be more picky than men and take high social status e.g. money and power, also certain personality traits such as kindness and generosity into account. On a good note, the matching hypothesis takes into account the roles of third parties which may form relationships such as friends, family or even dating sites. Hatfield and Sprecher (2009) suggest it is likely that these third parties would consider compatibility because they determine who would make suitable matches. For example, in traditional arranged marriages, parents may be in a better position to judge compatibility in the long term than are their children, those decisions maybe swayed be emotions or hormones (Xiaohe and Whyte 1990). In contrast, it doesn't take into account individual differences for e.g. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The matching hypothesis

    This shows a strong positive correlation. As the observed value is higher than the critical value, the alternative hypothesis is accepted, and the null hypothesis is rejected. It can be concluded that any differences in results are not due to chance alone.

  2. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the Matching Hypothesis

    Each observer rated the opposite sex partner of the couples on a 5-point scale. It was found that couples' attractiveness ratings were often very similar, and it was noted that the more similar the ratings given to a couple, the happier (as measured by level of intimacy displayed)

  1. Describe and evaluate the theories of attraction and relationship formation.

    Sociobiological needs have changed, e.g. both men and women can learn how to feed babies. Thus, this theory is supported by very little research. The approach is directed at reproductive relationships only, is deterministic and based on studies on non-human animal behaviour.

  2. Physiological Arousal and its Effects on Females interpretations of physical attractiveness

    of love, but maybe have different cultural backgrounds or religions Talking The girls had 30 minutes in between the ratings of the two boards in which they had time to discuss what they had seen on their first board and also ask questions about the second board, this could have

  1. conjugal roles

    The literature I used was from the internet and from several school text books and were from non bias and bias sources from sociologists. My method of research was appropriate to my aims because I needed to work out a percentage so therefore I needed quantitative data from a questionnaire.

  2. The Matching Hypothesis

    At this stage it was found that physical attractiveness was one of the biggest factors for deciding whether they enjoyed the date and would go out with them again. The males in the study seeking future dates depended nearly entirely on the physical attractiveness of the female (irrespective of their own).

  1. Matching Hypothesis

    The participants were then debriefed and told about the experiment and what it was for. The experiment dealt with deception, informed consent, right to withdraw and protection from harm by explaining the nature of the experiment thoroughly but without the worry of creating bias results, we asked for the participants

  2. Mate Selection and Preferences Across Decades

    As time changes, so does technology, and the way people select their mate in the 21st century is radically different from back in Hill's day when he conducted his survey in 1945. Appendix A 1. What best fits your age bracket?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work