• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Research into Majority Influence

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe and Evaluate research into Majority Influence (Conformity) Majority influence, also known as conformity, is a form of influence in which a large group of people influence a smaller group of people to make them behave or believe the same publicly. Asch's line experiment showed how we look to each other to make sure we are doing what a majority of people think is right. In the experiment he used confederates to influence the true participant. He found 25% of the people in the experiment never conformed meaning 75% conformed at least once. On top of this Asch also found 36.8% of responses made by true participants were incorrect. Crutchfield also did a similar task to Asch in which he got participants to decide the size of a stimulus card. Each participant was out of sight of each other but given fake answers which they believed were the other participants. In fact each participant was given the same answers. Crutchfields research showed that even when people weren't in the presence of others they still conformed for fear of ridicule or looking stupid from the experimenter. ...read more.

Middle

This being said this conformity shows how strong the tendency is to conform for such a simple task. This evidence shows how a majority of people can affect a singular person or small group even if they personally believe different to the majority. Asch's findings lead to more in detail research about conformity and development of his ideas to further analyse conformity and how others are influenced by a majority or a unanimous decision. Asch's study showed Informational influence which is the desire to be right, participants looked towards the behaviour of others in order to act how they believed was correct. Asch's experiment was a perfect example of this which was what he was aiming to find from the experiment. To make sure the stimulus was ambiguous Asch conducted a control trial in which confederates never gave wrong answers; he found participants were wrong 1% of the time. This is an example of how Asch's experiment had very low ecological validity because the task would not happen in real life but would have very high control because of the circumstances of the experiment. ...read more.

Conclusion

Zimbardo's study was very different to the others as there was no deception or examples given to show participants how to behave. Guards were told they could make their own rules and punish prisoners as they saw fit, because of this guards began treating prisoners like prisoners of war have been seen to be treated. The task had very high ecological validity because it was a real setting and circumstance that would happen in real life meaning low control as guards were free to behave as they saw fit. All of the participants were post graduate male American students; this is a bad thing about the experiment as you can't generalise and say this is how everyone would behave, students have a different ideology to adults. As the people involved were all also American it only shows how an American would conform to what they have seen on TV or heard about rather than a global effect. If females had been involved the experiment may have been different because of differences in a gender. Zimbardo's study also showed how uniforms affect us or behaviour towards a person such as what happened to the prisoners, feeling stressed and depressed because of their living conditions, humiliation they received and treatment within the prison. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    People should have conformed to around 200 pieces of pasta in the container, as this was the largest quantity put down. The cut off point for whether or not people conformed was at 126 pieces of pasta as this was the amount between the mean for the control and experimental group.

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    This may impact upon the results of the study. These other children because of different experiences and different school situations may have been able to conserve differently than Devon children. This difference in conservation ability may have shown different results.

  1. conjugal roles

    because that would involve washing up, loading the dishwasher and clearing the table after a family meal. I had to decide what type of data presentation to use and which one would best represent my data. I chose the pie chart over line and scatter graphs because it is easy to read the information.

  2. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    There are two possible outcomes in this case. The first outcome is that the person experiences dissonance and must change something to be consistent. The third statement above involves the idea that the person agreed to do something. This is relatively impervious to change because it is about an actual behaviour.

  1. investigating levels of majority influence

    and it was done over 10 years ago, so it will be difficult to generalize their results to the results that we obtain. Furthermore this investigation focused on teenage participants and it has been found that a teenage sample population is unpredictable since it has been claimed that teenagers go through a phase of having an 'identity crisis'.

  2. Theories of Asch and Tajfel

    to other individuals with whom they interact, but also compare their own group with similar and distinct, out groups."4 After the exam results were released, one characteristic of the members in FIMML was that they then tried to compare their results with others in their small seminar group, and secondly in a more general way against the other language groups.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work