• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Rosenhan, Thigpen and Cleckley - Describe what each of the studies tells us about individual difference.

Extracts from this document...


Psychology Essay. Some of the core studies take an individual approach to human behaviour and experience. This includes individual factors such as intelligence, mental health and race and how these characteristics determine our behaviour and experiences. Using the studies below, answer the questions: Gould Hraba and Grant Rosenhan Thigpen and Cleckley a) Describe what each of the studies tells us about individual difference.(12) b) Using examples, give 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses of the individual differences approach. (12) a) Gould's study looks into the fundamental problems involved in the attempts to measure intelligence. Gould analysed the procedure completed by Yerkes and found that he had ignored individual differences when doing the intelligence tests. Yerkes believed that intelligence was down to genetic differences in races and tested the participants with three tests, the alpha test, the beta test and the individual examination. ...read more.


The children were asked questions which showed their racial preference, awareness and knowledge and racial self-identification. The study showed that the white children were significantly more ethnocentric and the black children were more likely to pick a doll with the same colour as themselves. Rosenhan's study tested the hypothesis that psychiatrists cannot reliably tell the difference between a mentally sane person and an insane one. The study showed that in all cases the pseudopatients were admitted to the hospital and once they had got in it was difficult for them to leave. When doing relatively normal things such as write in a diary, the nurses took this as abnormal. It was also found that individual differences such as abnormality tended to stick as a psychiatric label whereas if it were just a medical label the patient would not have been treated in the same way. ...read more.


For example, in Rosenhan's study the hospitals were deceived, with no consent and no right of withdrawal. In Thigpen and Cleckley's study, it is not certain that Eve gave her consent for her case to be so widely publicized. Also not all her personalities gave their consent to be studied and it is unclear which personalities Thigpen and Cleckley should have blocked out. Another weakness to the individual approach is that in some cases it is not very valid. An example of this is in Hraba and Grant's study as the doll may not have been a good representation of a black child or a white child. The participants may have just chosen those dolls because they had to choose one of them and not because it was their preference. Also the question, 'which doll looks bad' is unclear as it may mean a number of things and the children may have interpreted it in a number of ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

This essay consists of two answers to two questions, which are both weighted equally at 12 marks each. The first question concerns AO1 (Assessment Objective 1: knowledge and understanding) only, and the candidate displays a very extensive knowledge of a ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This essay consists of two answers to two questions, which are both weighted equally at 12 marks each. The first question concerns AO1 (Assessment Objective 1: knowledge and understanding) only, and the candidate displays a very extensive knowledge of a selection of studies concerning individual differences. The comments about Gould/Yerkes' study are entirely valid and are nicely linked to the individual differences approach and the difficulty presented by using one test to measure intelligence of people of many different racial and social backgrounds. The comments about Hraba & Grant's, Rosenhan's, and Thigpen & Cleckley's studies are considerably lesser than Gould/Yerkes' study, but there is still a good link to the individual differences approach, However, the candidate cannot expect to achieve top marks because there is simple not enough detail in the last three studies. Some examiners may argue that there is too much detail in Gould/Yerkes' study, so an equal application of detail to each studies is important to achieve this. As it stands, the marks for this question (with 3 marks attributed for each study) would look something like 3 (Gould/Yerkes) + 2 (Hraba & Grant) + 3 (Rosenhan) + 2 (Thigpen & Cleckley = 10/12.

As for question two, the candidate is marked on AO1 (Assessment Objective 1: knowledge and understanding) and AO2 (Assessment Objective 2: critical evaluation). This question requires a very regimented structure and is often very prescriptive. Whilst some candidates worry about this it may be the only way to write all that is required in the time allotted. This candidate makes a very good argument for and against the practical and psychological application of the individual differences approach, each time citing a useful piece of evidence and clearly stating why the mentioned weakness/strength is as such. For this question, the candidate would elicit the full twelve marks.

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis is also going to be prescriptive and often very rehearsed-sounding. This will not prevent candidates from scoring highly if they manage to cover everything that is required. 3 marks are awarded for each strength and each weakness, though, as this candidate has been good to adhere to, the question does ask for only two of each, meaning the discussion must be balance and there must not bee 3 of one and 1 of the other. This candidate forms two strong strengths and two strong weaknesses with the individual differences approach, and gains their three marks for each of them by mentioning a strength/weakness (e.g. - ethics), giving a study to validate them (e.g. - Rosenhan) saying WHY it's a strength/weakness (e.g. - no right to withdraw from Rosenhan's study can cause mental harm).

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication is very good. From both a psychological and an English perspective. There are no issues with grammar, punctuation or spelling and the candidate writes fluently, using psychology-orientated terminology where appropriate.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 03/08/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Behavioural Study of Obedience - Stanley Milgram

    5 star(s)

    to withdraw from the experiment, the experimenter would say "Whether the learner likes it or not, you must go on until he has learned all the word pairs correctly. So please go on". The experiment would end either when the 450-volt shock had been administered, or when the subject walked out.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the five main perspectives in psychology

    3 star(s)

    and their prior learning, so they do not play any part in choosing their own actions. The approach takes the nurture side of the nature-nurture debate, believing that apart from a few innate reflexes and the capacity for learning, all complex behaviour is learned from the environment.

  1. Intelligence Essay

    However there are a lot of issues of debate that surround these, as well as any other types of intelligence/aptitude tests, taking their validity, reliability and neutrality into question. In the past, IQ tests have been seen as a way to distinguish who might be the 'right man for the

  2. The Gestalt Approach to Psychology

    It is at this point that growth takes place, even though the individual may not be aware of it. The gestalt closes and balance is restored; the individual is now at rest, ready for the next need to arise. To make good contact, it is essential that figure is clear and distinguished from ground.

  1. Consider the Problems Faced by Psychologists in the Definition of Abnormality

    There is a wide scope for error in diagnoses as a 'black or white' approach is given- if a person is within a certain percentage they are normal, if not they are abnormal- this cannot be representative of an illness such as depression which has a range of severities.

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Biological, Psychodynamic and Cognitive Explanations of Abnormality

    concordance rate was higher than that of the dizygotic twins who shared only half of their genes. However, if the presence of the illness was due to genetics alone it would be expected that the monozygotic twins would show 100% concordance.

  1. The contents of this essay will explain different psychological approaches to health and social ...

    Drinking can also be habitual and again, the subconscious is where habits are formed. For numerous individual with drink problems, their reasons can be traced to lack of confidence or poor self-esteem. We are all aware how our inhibitions disappear after the consumption of alcohol, but for an individual, who

  2. Level 2 Counselling skills. Theories -CBT, Psychodynamic and Person Centred.

    The relationships we establish, the way we are treated by our parents and many of our other experiences have a huge impact to the structure of our psyche and the personality and behaviour we display as adults. Freud thought that childhood development went in stages.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work