• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Social Psychology

Extracts from this document...


Psychology - Social Assessment Questions If a teacher tells you to do something it is usual that you obey. This situation can be changed for example if the person resisting obedience has an ally. This can make it more difficult for the teacher to discipline the student as they feel they are being backed up by one of their peers, they would feel more confident about ignoring teacher's orders. 2) People may or may not conform to others in-group situations. Asch's study shows people conforming in group situations. This is evident in the study conducted by Asch (1956) who aimed to find out whether people conformed to the majority on a group situation. He found that on the 12 critical trials, 36.8% of the responses made by true participants were incorrect. Approximately, one quarter of the participants didn't conform in any of the trials. This shows that almost half of the group conformed to a group situation even if they didn't agree with the answers of the others. ...read more.


The tests tended to lack ecological validity as they were conducted in a lab and not likely to be done in real life. People do not always obey orders from someone in authority. For example, in the Milgram study where the setting was moved, people felt less pressurised to obey orders from someone when they were in a downtown office as compared to being in a Yale University, where they found it harder to resist authority. Resistance was also increased when the victim was seen or when other participants were present. Another reason why people might not obey orders from someone in authority is due to morality. The may feel that something is not ethically acceptable. For example, in Milgram's study where the participants were presented with dilemmas, those who based their decisions on more general moral principles were more defiant in the Milgram study. The third reason why people do not always obey from someone in authority is because of the idea of social heroism. ...read more.


Twenge et al found that young Americans increasingly believe that their lives are controlled by external circumstances. This makes them external. Attribution style is a personal attribute that indicates how people explain themselves why they experience a particular event. There are 3 different components; personal, permanent and pervasive. Personal is when a person sees themselves as the cause of an event, permanent is when a person sees that situation as affecting all aspects of their life being restricted. For example, Heaven et al found significant differences between self-identified studious students and rebellious students. Rebels scored higher on negative attribution style, whereas studious students scored higher on positive attribution style. Conformity is when people agree with the majority/minority view. They will usually go against what they themselves believe and will conform to either fit in (normative social influence) or be correct (informational social influence). For example, in a juror's court, other people in the jury may be likely to withhold their opinion due to not wanting to go against what other people say. Obedience is when people act on another persons orders. For example, acting on a figure of authority's orders. This is existent in the Milgram study whereby the participants obeyed the experimenter. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    Samuel and Bryant altered the method used by Piaget to investigate conservation, by asking the question only once after the changes had been made instead of twice, before and after as in Piaget's experiment. The results obtained by Samuel and Bryant suggest to us that the errors made by the

  2. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Greenfield (1984) supports this view, who found that Sesame Street's use of ethnic and disabled minorities helped children from minority groups to have a greater sense of cultural pride. Futhermore Mares (1996) examined research into anti-stereotyping and overall found that there was a moderate positive effect that children become less stereotyped in their attitudes and beliefs.

  1. What are attribution biases and when do they occur?

    An experiment by Storms (1973) illustrated how this bias might depend on the different perceptual focus of actors and observers. Judgements about causes of behaviour during a "get acquainted" conversation were found to depend on the direction of attention of the person making the judgement.

  2. Understanding Discipline.

    IE: A Police Officer accepts an alcoholic drink from the Landlord while investigating a break in to a pub. Problem ? - misconduct towards a member of the Police Service i. Harassment ii. Victimisation iii. Assault - Disobedience to orders * neglect of duty * falsehood of prevarication * evidence

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work