• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Social Psychology - Milgram, Zimbardo prison study

Extracts from this document...


Psychology- Milgram, Zimbardo prison study Sherif's Conformity and the autokinetic effect experiment Individuals were asked to estimate how far they thought The light moved, and then tested them together in a group. Group norm was established informational social influence Asch - Stimulus line- 74% of the innocent participants Went along with the group and conformed at least once Zimbardo's Prison simulation experiment- example of Normative influence, Volunteers were given authority and Asked to act as guards over other volunteers were prisoners. Aim: to see the psychological effects of making 'normal', 'Good' people into prisoners or guards.Volunteers: 24 mid Class, male college students, mentally fine and no criminal records, were paid $15 per day and divided into prisoners or guards by the flip of a ...read more.


Procedure: Volunteers were told to administer electric shocks of increasing voltage, up to 450V, to a 'learner' each time the learner made an error. An 'experimenter' was overseeing the operation and dressed in a white lab coat. When the 'learner' started to make errors and the 'teacher' began to worry, the 'experimenter' reminded them of the need to continue. Predictions: Milgram asked 40 psychiatrists to predict the results, they said that less than 1% would go all the way Results: The psychiatrists were very wrong. Obedience rates were way higher. Two thirds of volunteers went up to 450V. No one stopped before 275V! Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical? ...read more.


It is important to remember that neither Milgram nor Zimbardo expected their experiments to have such dramatic effects, although this does not absolve responsibility! To this end, Milgram consulted psychiatrists before carrying out his experiments - he debriefed and followed people up- even after a year - to make sure they weren't hurt by the experience. Most volunteers said they were pleased that they took part. Before his prison experiment, Zimbardo used personality tests on volunteers to select stable characters. Milgram and Zimbardo were very mindful of the state of mind of their volunteers and followed them all up carefully afterwards. Their work has had important implications for the way in which we view cases of blind obedience in real life, for example, the Jim Jones cult suicides and the running of prison systems. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Philip Zimbardo is the psychologist that conducted the prison simulation experiment which was intending ...

    The prisoner subjects remained in the mock prison 24 hours a day for the duration of the experiment, nine were randomly assigned thre to each cell, and the remaining three were on standby at home.

  2. Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical?

    Obedience to authority is deeply ingrained from early childhood when we are taught to obey our parents, teachers and elders. It is possible that the demand characteristics raised obedience rates. In Milgram's experiments people felt they were 'helping' in a scientific experiment.

  1. Obedience to Authority: Milgram & Zimbardo

    After 450 volts were administered three times, the experimenter called a halt to the session" (224). The teachers did what they were told to do, even when the learners produced loud cries and screams; they simply obeyed the rules and performed their assigned tasks because it was expected of them.

  2. "Some of the Procedures Used by Social Physiatrists Such as Asch, Zimbardo and Milgram ...

    time the learner got a question wrong or took too long to answer, the teacher was to shock them with the voltage rising each time to see if they would learn more quickly. However, the participants labelled "learner" were really actors and Milgram's real intention was too see how far people would continue shock when urged by authority figures.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work