• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Some psychologists believe that we simply rehearse things and that is how we remember. By rehearsing it leaves our short-term memory and enters our long-term memory.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction Background Information Some psychologists believe that we simply rehearse things and that is how we remember. By rehearsing it leaves our short-term memory and enters our long-term memory. This does not explain why we forget things or why certain things help us to remember. The effect of context forgetting is known as context dependent forgetting or cue dependent forgetting. We need the right cues to access information. Good evidence for cue dependent forgetting comes from Tulving (1966). Tulving read people lists of words from various categories e.g. furniture or animals. The category names were also presented but the participants were not asked to remember the category names just the examples e.g. chair, table etc. They found that, in free recall those participants who were given the paper with the category names as headings remembered more words than those just given a blank sheet of paper. This demonstrates how cues can guide information in memory that we were unable to otherwise. Tulving (1974) also distinguished between context dependent recall and state dependent recall. Context dependent recall relates to externally generated cues from the environment. ...read more.


* When they have been shown all of the word pairs, the music is stopped. * They are then given a distracter task. * After 45 seconds they are told to stop. * They are then shown the pairs of words again, but the right hand side are missing. They still get shown one word at a time, until all words have been shown and they are asked to recall the other word. * The same steps are followed for Condition B but with the music kept on. Another word list is used. * Asked to recall with music on. * A debriefing. See Appendices Controls * All Participants were given a consent form. * Were given instruction sheets. * Were in the same room. * Were shown the same word pairs. * BPS guidelines were followed. Results Raw Data Correct Participant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Condition A Music on turned off when asked to match pairs. 5 5 4 9 0 6 4 8 4 8 4 7 2 2 5 3 6 0 3 11 Condition B Music kept on when asked to give pairs. ...read more.


Implications My background information like Tulving and Godden and Baddeley suggest that cues help recall. I used music as a cue in my experiment and that did not appear to help recall. The difference in the two conditions was very narrow. This may indicate that the experiment was wrong in some way. Generalisation of Findings The experiment was done on 20 17-19 year olds who are studying AS or A2 levels. You cannot generalise to the rest of the population as students are trained to remember as they have been in education since the age of 5. You could therefore only generalise on 17-19 year olds in full time education. It did not tell us about age or gender. A sample of 20 is far too small to generalise from, as 20 people cannot account for everyone in the rest of the population. Application to everyday life In many situations cues can be very helpful. Students use cues to help them to revise for exams and the examiner can use a stimulus to help the student to remember in exams. E.g. after revising for psychology, students could use Tulving's ideas to create categories of information to make the work more manageable and easier to remember. Makeshya Maitland-Campbell Page 1 of 8 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Define short-term memory and describe the main factors that influence the number of items ...

    4 star(s)

    Nairne believes that simple appeals to rehearsal or decay are unlikely to explain the specific details of short-term forgetting (Nairne 2002 [5]). He criticises the view that rehearsal and decay are determining factors of remembering over the short term and opts for a cue driven approach.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Memory Process. This paper will describe a memory test using numbers, letters, and ...

    3 star(s)

    Long Term Memory The continual storage of information is referred to as long term memory. Long term memory is typified as concerning semantic encoding, in particular, recalling the definition or understanding of a word as opposed to the literal word (Terry, 2009).


    The short-term memory is capable of holding around 2 seconds of sound therefore a person can remember around 5 or 9 words from the word list given to them. As the investigated memory is the short-term memory, it was said that the information passing the sensory memory to the short-term memory had to be given attention.

  2. An investigation into the Affect of Organisation on memory.

    The task takes place in the recreational centre in the college. This is in the participants own settings rather than in a laboratory. This should reduce the stress and pressure of the situation and promote natural behaviour.

  1. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    Method Method and Design An experimental method was used to collect data using a repeated measures design. Using a repeated measures design means that you do not have to use so many participants, however order reffects might take place, which is when performing one task affects the performance of the next task.

  2. The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall

    The next best performance was observed with the chucked items with the distraction technique imposed. In this condition participants recalled a total of 61.4 words on average. Participants performed the least well in the non-chunked conditions, particularly when a distraction was provided alongside, in this case participants only recalled 54.8

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    The stores were the sensory memory, short-term memory and long-term memory. Atkinson & Shiffrin agreed that the processes of attention and rehearsal were responsible for controlling the flow of information between the stages or stores. Atkinson & Shiffrin also found the measurements of human short term memory capacity to have a 7�2 limit.

  2. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    Looking at research mainly by Jacobs (1887) and Miller (1956) the following hypotheses have been drawn up. Alternate Hypothesis Significantly more digits will be recalled accurately in sequence in the chunked condition than in the un-chunked condition. Null Hypothesis There is no difference in the number of digits recalled in the chunked or un-chunked condition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work