• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source G is an extract from a novel about evacuees. It is from 'Carries War,' a novel for children written by Nina Bowden in 1973. Source G tells the story of two children entering the home of a host family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Umair Ameen 11D Is Source G reliable as evidence about evacuees? Source G is an extract from a novel about evacuees. It is from 'Carries War,' a novel for children written by Nina Bowden in 1973. Source G tells the story of two children entering the home of a host family. The story is from the children's perspective. From analysing this source, there are certain aspects that make it reliable. 'Not a speck of dust anywhere.' The beginning line immediately gives us the impression of a rich, tidy and prosperous house in the country belonging to an upper middle-class family. I think that Source G give us the common thought in that time of people living in the countryside being wealthy. Certain aspects of this quote is reliable because it was also shown this way in the film , the people that lived in the country had a better, much cleaner lifestyle. ...read more.

Middle

However, the evacuees giggle 'She thinks we're poor children' this suggests to the historian that these children may not be poor as Miss Evans assumed, they might also have come from an upper middle-class family, it was very stereotypical view at this time of WW2 where the people in the country used to think that town people were poor. This shows a whole new perspective rather than the general thoughts which give the historian a slightly balanced view now. From my own knowledge, some evacuees enjoyed their time, children could have there own private clean and comfortable, they had more baths, education, these are a positive outcomes out of evacuation. This source is useful as it portrays most evacuees faced the same situation of adapting into a new lifestyle. ...read more.

Conclusion

From my own knowledge. I know that the majority of evacuees suffered neglection and mal-treatment. Siblings were usually separated and taken to different host families however fortunately these two were not. This source doesn't not give us in dept analysis so it provides us no further insight and no great detail to give us a better understanding. This is only one experience of evacuation and therefore makes it a hard to have an all-round clear description of evacuation. These are some of the negatives that may affect the accuracy for the historian. In conclusion, I think Source G is unreliable evidence about evacuees as it only gives us one experience about evacuation. Yes it would be useful but this is not the true story for many evacuees. The reliability of a source depends on the accuracy of information and these are just general thoughts and ideas about evacuation. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Adoption in a qay home?

    This negative treatment could also extend to the child's every day life at school, through means of taunting by the children of heterosexual couples. Bullying could perhaps reach such a degree that the child begins to begrudge its adoptive parents for causing them to experience such torment.

  2. Discussing an extract 'Carries War,' by Nina Bowden.

    Some aspects could be turned down, exaggerated or simplified for children and the use of vocabulary would be simple. Evacuation would be a great topic to write a story about as it was a huge event in children's views.If the author had have had no evacuation experience then there would

  1. "Boys from the Blackstuff" "Yosser's Story"

    He wishes he were like them, a happy family with a normal lifestyle. At this point the children are starting to get worried, 'what are we going to do?' This makes us feel sympathetic towards the children and not just Yosser.

  2. A critical analysis of the use of language and presentational features, within two texts, ...

    Text The Rainbow Fish has lots of dialogue to demonstrate interaction, whereas Rumpus at the Vet has none. Pfister, plays on the reader's feelings to make the story emotive. Feelings of, loneliness, selfishness, sadness and happiness play a big part in the story.

  1. Is Homework Beneficial to Children in Any way?

    fails to actually show any real unyielding evidence that it makes a difference. The 1995 OFSTED report does cite many other useful purposes for homework like: "Schools saw the main benefits of homework as the improvement in pupil's attitudes to learning..."

  2. 'Boys from the Black Stuff ' - 'yossers story '.

    Yosser takes his children to the pub. The Landlord of the pub says to Yosser " Sorry Yosser - No children in here". Yosser once again just stares blankly. The Landlord feels intimidated and lets them stay. Yosser sits next to Grame Souness and says "You look like me" Graeme looks at Yosser and replies "right".

  1. The evacuation of British Children - Which source is the more useful as evidence ...

    The source is useful as I given evidence towards have new life was like, but its not all reliable. Source B is a photograph of evacuees walking to a station in London.

  2. The Home Front: Evacuation

    A handful of people are just plain awkward. If you tell them to do something, then they do the opposite. Many were just being rebellious and proving a very immature point to the Government when they chose against evacuating their children to the country, and I think that they must have regretted it when the bombing started.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work