• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources B and C. Which source is the more useful as evidence about the start of the children's evacuation journey? Explain your answer using Sources B and C and knowledge from your studies.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Study Sources B and C. Which source is the more useful as evidence about the start of the children's evacuation journey? Explain your answer using Sources B and C and knowledge from your studies. Source B is a picture/snapshot, called "Evacuees walking to the station in London, September 1939," taken by the government. In the picture, I can see a big group of children walking down the street, which by the title are going to the station. They have gas masks by there side, and in there hands a bag of belongings. I can see teachers walking by the side of them, and some parents, following them. The expressions on the faces of the teachers and the children are happy, smiling and waving to the camera. In Source B, many of the features match the knowledge I have of evacuation. First thing is the title, "Evacuees walking to the station in London, September 1939." I know instantly from the title that it matches what I know, that Evacuation occurred in 1939, and that the Evacuees got sent to safer place by train. ...read more.

Middle

Also the fact that it is a snapshot doesn't tell us the story off the picture. So overall I think this source is fairly useful, because some of the features are true and match my knowledge. But on the other hand the government took the photo and used it to persuade families to send their children away. Source C is an Interview, "A teacher remembers being evacuated with children from her school." The teacher interviewed in 1988. In the interview there are certain points she makes, about the children, the mothers and the train. According to the teacher, all you could hear was the feet of the children and they were too afraid to talk. The mothers weren't allowed with the children, but followed them to the station anyway. Once they had got to the train station, the train was there ready. They just got on it and went, and they had no idea where the train was going to take them. The gates closed, and the mothers called "Good-bye, darling," to there children. ...read more.

Conclusion

The teacher makes a point about the children that they were afraid to talk. How did she know this? Did she ask them? The children may not have wanted to talk; It may have been an upsetting experience for the children. So I don't believe this point she has made, and it doesn't match my knowledge. Finally she gives a general overview of what the mothers said: "Good-bye darling." Not all the mothers shouted that so it is giving a general overview. Overall I think this source is quite useful. In conclusion, I think that source C gives a better idea of what happened. I think Source B is fake considering the government took it, the children are happy about leaving their parents. In my opinion not many people at all would be happy about leaving their parents for months on end when they are between 5 and 16 years old. There are random people also on the picture, and it doesn't tell us anything about them, they could be parents or more teachers, police men etc. Whereas in source C the teacher explains what happened in own words, a true account of what occurred. It is a primary source. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Using studies from the list below, answer the questions which follow: Rosenhan (sane in ...

    which have been implicated in other psychiatric conditions but which have not been related to violence. The sample size of this study consisted of 41 murderers (labeled as murders for ease of reference) and 41 controls. The experimental group of this study consisted of 41 participants tried in the state of California (39 men and 2 women)

  2. The evacuation of British Children - Which source is the more useful as evidence ...

    The teachers is talking about the feelings, sites and sounds from when they left for the station to when they where just about to get on the train. The source is useful as it tells the reader about the feeling and all the emotions running through the mothers as they watch there children leave for a new life.

  1. Psychology Cae Studies

    arrested and ended when they were finger printed and photographed, contributed to the prisoners internalising the prison. This occurred because of the shock value it signified a break from the prison (subjects) everyday reality they were arrested-they were now prisoners.

  2. Research Study About Accidents That Occur To Young Children.

    * Children play with matches and lighters without knowing the consequences. * Children haven't been warned about the risks fire poses. * Parents or guardians may not have a fireguard. Electrical * Cord's and flexes are left in child's reach.

  1. Newstead Abbey History Assignment Part 1 - Using all the evidence you have explain ...

    Therefore the heating system was not continued into the loft and there were no fires in the nursery. The tour guide also mentioned that in the book written by Augusta Webb, one of the Webb's children, on her childhood it mentions many times how cold she felt practically all of the time.

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The purpose of the source was to teach children in 1973 what it would be like to be an evacuee. In the source there is two children and a teacher that is looking after them, the children hadn't enough room in the cases to put any slippers in, miss Evans

  1. Evacuation- Comparing Source B and C

    It tells us her memories of what happened and her opinion of events. The teacher has the benefit of historical hindsight; she can look into the past to previous events and refer to her memories. The teacher is also familiar with different views e.g.

  2. History - Evacuation

    There is an observer interviewing a father of a 7-year-old child. In the extract, there are a series of questions, which the father answers. They are generally about what the reaction to evacuation in the area is, and the father's own thoughts on it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work