• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of the experiment is to find out whether or not recall is higher when there is a cue present - Memory.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction Aim: The aim of the experiment is to find out whether or not recall is higher when there is a cue present Background information: Memory is the process of retaining information after the original object is no longer present. Most psychologists believe that we have two types of memory. A Long Term Memory (LTM) and a Short Term Memory (STM). The LTM can store vast amounts of information for long periods and the STM lasts for around 15-20 seconds. According to Miller, the STM can store 7+-2 chunks. A person also tends to remember things if they are familiar. The three stages on learning lists to recall are: 1. Encoding Storing the information in the memory creating a memory trace 2. ...read more.


Category headings had an obvious effect on recall. The cues made the words more accessible. Hypothesis Categorised headings will have a significantly improve the recall of a list of words. Null Hypothesis Categorised headings will have no effect on the recall of a list of words Directional Hypothesis Categorised Headings will significantly improve recall on a list of words. The Independent Variable will be using category headings and not using category headings. The dependant variable will be measuring the amount of words that are remembered. If the confounding variables are not controlled then it could falsify the results, consequently the conclusions drawn would be untrue. ...read more.


Apparatus and Materials The following will be needed to allow this experiment to take place. For the willing participants 20x paper with the category headings 20x blank pieces of paper For the researcher to read to the participants 1x list of words with the category headings 1x list of words without the category headings 1x stop clock to allow 3 mins for recall I constructed the list of words after a group discussion. Procedure The participants will be fully briefed, debriefed and will be given standardised instructions. Briefing and debriefing are for the interest of the participants as so are the standardised instructions to give the participants full instructions about what to do in the experiment. Not only are the briefing, debriefing and the standardised instructions (see appendix) part of the BPS guidelines but allow other researchers to recreate your study. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays


    A strength of the research is that it can be clearly distinguished that group 1 performed better in the recall test compared to group 2, it is also important to mention that this was predicted so it is a strength that the research matched my assumptions from the beginning and that there were no big surprises.

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    Median Condition A - Without interference 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 9 The median for 'without interference is 5. Condition B - With interference 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8 The median for 'with interference is 5.

  1. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    In this investigation, participants in condition 1 (words with images) recalled 70.5% of the words compared to 63% by the non-imagers. My investigation does support Bower's findings, since there is a difference however the differences between the two conditions is not significant.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    I said that this was due to the fact that chunking is proven to significantly help memory and also because the letters will have meaning to the participants which will help them remember them even more. My results relate to my hypothesis because what I had predicted came true in the actual experiment.

  1. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    clearly shows higher central tendencies (mode - 7, median - 7 and mean - 6.7) than condition B (middle: positions 5-12) which displayed central tendencies of mode - 5, median - 5 and mean - 4.6. After calculating the Wilcoxon T score, it is possible to see that the T score (4.5)

  2. An investigation about retrieval failure in memory (retrieval cues) whether participants can recall more ...

    the playing fields as possible, so that outside noise is not a distraction. Participants The target population used was year 10 students from High Storrs School, Sheffield. The sampling method which was used was opportunity sampling which involved finding a class that would be available at a time that suited me and them.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    (Cox 2001) A subsequent experiment conducted by Godden and Baddeley (1975), where the divers were asked to remember a list of words in two very different settings, on land or 20 feet underwater, followed by a four minutes gap before they were asked to recall the words in those two different settings.

  2. the affect interference has on the recall of words

    This was done for around 25 seconds then the participants had to recall as many words as they could. By counting back in three's this does not allow the information to be rehearsed. My task is very similar to this except I will be counting back from 2s from 60

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work