• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of the experiment is to find out whether or not recall is higher when there is a cue present - Memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction Aim: The aim of the experiment is to find out whether or not recall is higher when there is a cue present Background information: Memory is the process of retaining information after the original object is no longer present. Most psychologists believe that we have two types of memory. A Long Term Memory (LTM) and a Short Term Memory (STM). The LTM can store vast amounts of information for long periods and the STM lasts for around 15-20 seconds. According to Miller, the STM can store 7+-2 chunks. A person also tends to remember things if they are familiar. The three stages on learning lists to recall are: 1. Encoding Storing the information in the memory creating a memory trace 2. ...read more.

Middle

Category headings had an obvious effect on recall. The cues made the words more accessible. Hypothesis Categorised headings will have a significantly improve the recall of a list of words. Null Hypothesis Categorised headings will have no effect on the recall of a list of words Directional Hypothesis Categorised Headings will significantly improve recall on a list of words. The Independent Variable will be using category headings and not using category headings. The dependant variable will be measuring the amount of words that are remembered. If the confounding variables are not controlled then it could falsify the results, consequently the conclusions drawn would be untrue. ...read more.

Conclusion

Apparatus and Materials The following will be needed to allow this experiment to take place. For the willing participants 20x paper with the category headings 20x blank pieces of paper For the researcher to read to the participants 1x list of words with the category headings 1x list of words without the category headings 1x stop clock to allow 3 mins for recall I constructed the list of words after a group discussion. Procedure The participants will be fully briefed, debriefed and will be given standardised instructions. Briefing and debriefing are for the interest of the participants as so are the standardised instructions to give the participants full instructions about what to do in the experiment. Not only are the briefing, debriefing and the standardised instructions (see appendix) part of the BPS guidelines but allow other researchers to recreate your study. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    A strength of the research is that it can be clearly distinguished that group 1 performed better in the recall test compared to group 2, it is also important to mention that this was predicted so it is a strength that the research matched my assumptions from the beginning and that there were no big surprises.

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    Mean Condition A - Without Interference Total 52 / 10 = 5.2 Condition B - With Interference Total 51 / 10 = 5.2 Range Condition A - Without interference 9 - 2 = 7 Condition B - With interference 8 - 3 = 5 DISCUSSION Interpretation The results of the

  1. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    Inferential statistics, which enable us to draw clear conclusions about the likelihood of the hypothesis being true, is evidence for accepting the null hypothesis. The implication of the results measured using a non-parametric method, The Mann-Whitney U-test clearly shows that at the significance level of 0.05, the results were very likely to have happened by chance.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    easier to remember than words or letters chunked together that they had never heard before. Validity This experiment does have ecological validity. This is because what was claimed to have been measured, which was whether chunking affects how much a person can remember, is exactly what was measured.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    Baddeley come up with the idea that coding in short term memory was based on the sound of the word or Acoustic memory. Links can also be made between this study and the Atkinson & Shiffrin study in 1968. They used the systematic model of memory to help suggest ideas.

  2. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    clearly shows higher central tendencies (mode - 7, median - 7 and mean - 6.7) than condition B (middle: positions 5-12) which displayed central tendencies of mode - 5, median - 5 and mean - 4.6. After calculating the Wilcoxon T score, it is possible to see that the T score (4.5)

  1. An investigation about retrieval failure in memory (retrieval cues) whether participants can recall more ...

    I will do this by splitting the group down the middle as they are sat. The people on the left will be free recall and the people on the right cued recall. The independent variable is whether the participants have free recall or whether they have cued recall.

  2. This study is based on the theory of cue dependent forgetting - more specifically, ...

    be supported by these results, as there is a significant and directional difference between the classroom and dining hall evident in each measure of average, although the mode and median can almost be discounted as representatives of central tendency. However, the results show the size of the sample to be insufficient as there are significant gaps in the data.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work