• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of the experiment is to find out whether or not recall is higher when there is a cue present - Memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction Aim: The aim of the experiment is to find out whether or not recall is higher when there is a cue present Background information: Memory is the process of retaining information after the original object is no longer present. Most psychologists believe that we have two types of memory. A Long Term Memory (LTM) and a Short Term Memory (STM). The LTM can store vast amounts of information for long periods and the STM lasts for around 15-20 seconds. According to Miller, the STM can store 7+-2 chunks. A person also tends to remember things if they are familiar. The three stages on learning lists to recall are: 1. Encoding Storing the information in the memory creating a memory trace 2. ...read more.

Middle

Category headings had an obvious effect on recall. The cues made the words more accessible. Hypothesis Categorised headings will have a significantly improve the recall of a list of words. Null Hypothesis Categorised headings will have no effect on the recall of a list of words Directional Hypothesis Categorised Headings will significantly improve recall on a list of words. The Independent Variable will be using category headings and not using category headings. The dependant variable will be measuring the amount of words that are remembered. If the confounding variables are not controlled then it could falsify the results, consequently the conclusions drawn would be untrue. ...read more.

Conclusion

Apparatus and Materials The following will be needed to allow this experiment to take place. For the willing participants 20x paper with the category headings 20x blank pieces of paper For the researcher to read to the participants 1x list of words with the category headings 1x list of words without the category headings 1x stop clock to allow 3 mins for recall I constructed the list of words after a group discussion. Procedure The participants will be fully briefed, debriefed and will be given standardised instructions. Briefing and debriefing are for the interest of the participants as so are the standardised instructions to give the participants full instructions about what to do in the experiment. Not only are the briefing, debriefing and the standardised instructions (see appendix) part of the BPS guidelines but allow other researchers to recreate your study. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    A strength of the research is that it can be clearly distinguished that group 1 performed better in the recall test compared to group 2, it is also important to mention that this was predicted so it is a strength that the research matched my assumptions from the beginning and that there were no big surprises.

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    Median Condition A - Without interference 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 9 The median for 'without interference is 5. Condition B - With interference 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8 The median for 'with interference is 5.

  1. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    Previous research does suggest that data in STM is stored in an acoustic manner this was demonstrated by Conrad (1964). Illustrating people may not always use visual codes to remember data and this supports the null hypothesis; in addition Baddeley's (1966)

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    This graph clearly shows that the results on Test A were noticeably better than on Test B. This is consistent with the summary table above. This graph also shows that in general the scores on Test A range from 6-8 whereas with Test B they range from about 0-4.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    floor was equal when students were instructed to recollect the encoding environment. Method and design Participants Opportunity sampling was used as the experiment took place at the college, where opportunity sampling is the quickest and convenient way to get participants, because there is easy access to students.

  2. A Study to Investigate Whether Leading Questions have an Effect on Memory

    To control this all participants must be over the age of 16. All participants will have to sign a consent form giving their consent. They will be asked if they understand the brief and what they are going to be asked to do throughout the experiment.

  1. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    of adverts were shown to 20 participants who were then asked to free recall these adverts Measures of central tendency. Products from condition A: Primacy recency condition (defined as positions 1-4 and 13-16) Products from condition B: The middle condition (defined as positions 5-12)

  2. An investigation about retrieval failure in memory (retrieval cues) whether participants can recall more ...

    The dependant variable is the number of words recalled by the two separate groups. There was a numerous amount of extraneous variables that were controlled. One of these was noise, because noise may distract participants and cause them to loose concentration, which in turn will hinder the words they remember.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work