• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of the experiment is to find out whether or not recall is higher when there is a cue present - Memory.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction Aim: The aim of the experiment is to find out whether or not recall is higher when there is a cue present Background information: Memory is the process of retaining information after the original object is no longer present. Most psychologists believe that we have two types of memory. A Long Term Memory (LTM) and a Short Term Memory (STM). The LTM can store vast amounts of information for long periods and the STM lasts for around 15-20 seconds. According to Miller, the STM can store 7+-2 chunks. A person also tends to remember things if they are familiar. The three stages on learning lists to recall are: 1. Encoding Storing the information in the memory creating a memory trace 2. ...read more.


Category headings had an obvious effect on recall. The cues made the words more accessible. Hypothesis Categorised headings will have a significantly improve the recall of a list of words. Null Hypothesis Categorised headings will have no effect on the recall of a list of words Directional Hypothesis Categorised Headings will significantly improve recall on a list of words. The Independent Variable will be using category headings and not using category headings. The dependant variable will be measuring the amount of words that are remembered. If the confounding variables are not controlled then it could falsify the results, consequently the conclusions drawn would be untrue. ...read more.


Apparatus and Materials The following will be needed to allow this experiment to take place. For the willing participants 20x paper with the category headings 20x blank pieces of paper For the researcher to read to the participants 1x list of words with the category headings 1x list of words without the category headings 1x stop clock to allow 3 mins for recall I constructed the list of words after a group discussion. Procedure The participants will be fully briefed, debriefed and will be given standardised instructions. Briefing and debriefing are for the interest of the participants as so are the standardised instructions to give the participants full instructions about what to do in the experiment. Not only are the briefing, debriefing and the standardised instructions (see appendix) part of the BPS guidelines but allow other researchers to recreate your study. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays


    A strength of the research is that it can be clearly distinguished that group 1 performed better in the recall test compared to group 2, it is also important to mention that this was predicted so it is a strength that the research matched my assumptions from the beginning and that there were no big surprises.

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    Mean Condition A - Without Interference Total 52 / 10 = 5.2 Condition B - With Interference Total 51 / 10 = 5.2 Range Condition A - Without interference 9 - 2 = 7 Condition B - With interference 8 - 3 = 5 DISCUSSION Interpretation The results of the

  1. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    This graph clearly shows that the results on Test A were noticeably better than on Test B. This is consistent with the summary table above. This graph also shows that in general the scores on Test A range from 6-8 whereas with Test B they range from about 0-4.

  2. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    Apparatus/materials found in the appendices (1-7). * Standardised Procedure 1. 20 participants were used for conducting this research study, 10 were males and 10 were females aged from 16-25 gained through opportunity sampling. There were two groups/conditions of 10 (5 males, 5 females).

  1. An investigation about retrieval failure in memory (retrieval cues) whether participants can recall more ...

    ( 9 boys and 11 girls) between the ages of 14-15 years old. However as they are under 16 I had to get a letter of the head teacher to send to their parents and guardians, asking for their permission for their son or daughter to take part in the experiment ( see appendix)

  2. The Effect Of Conceptual Hierarchies On Memory Recall

    devised the hierarchical network model of semantic memory. This is concerned with our memory for words and their meanings. This report is a scaled mimic by the work of Bower et al (1969). He presented two groups of participants with identical sets of words to learn. One group had organised words by conceptual hierarchy, the other group's words were random.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    Further more, Klatzky (1980) also proposed that recalling is much better when done in the same condition as where the encoding took place. He used this finding to explain the remembering of vivid memories when a person revisits childhood places or smells a familiar scent.

  2. A Study to Investigate Whether Leading Questions have an Effect on Memory

    Hypothesis The Alternative Hypothesis - Participants asked the question with the definite article will have a higher number of incorrect answers in the memory test than those asked the question including the indefinite article. The Null Hypothesis - There will be no significant difference between the number of incorrect answers

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work