• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of this experiment was to test the idea that effort and not levels of processing determine memory trace. Specifically to partially replicate the study by Tyler (1979) in which there were two groups each given a list of anagrams of the same words.

Extracts from this document...


CONTENTS Page no. 1. Abstract 1 2. Introduction 2 3. Method 4 4. Results 5 5. Discussion 6 6. References 7 7. Appendix 8 Abstract The aim of this experiment was to test the idea that effort and not levels of processing determine memory trace. Specifically to partially replicate the study by Tyler (1979) in which there were two groups each given a list of anagrams of the same words. However one list is harder to solve than the other, an unexpected recall test is then given. He found that the group with the harder anagrams recalled more when given a recall test than the group given the easy anagrams. So ten participants were selected, five were given a list of easy anagrams to solve and the other five were given the hard list of anagrams to solve. They were then given an unexpected recall test. The percentage of words recalled from the correctly solved anagrams was recorded. A Mann-Whitney U test was carried out which gave a result of U= 9 at a level of significance p< 0.05 but this value obtained was grater than the critical value U=4 so the result is non significant. The directional hypothesis that the participants solving the harder anagrams will show a significant difference in recall compared to those solving the easy anagrams is rejected and null hypothesis accepted. ...read more.


One group is given a hard set of anagrams to solve whilst the other group (control group) is given an easy set of anagrams to solve. The Independent variable is the amount of effort used to solve the anagrams and the Dependent variable is the percentage of words recalled from the anagrams solved. A pilot study was carried out and it was found that the words 'strawberry' and 'raspberry' were too hard to solve and so were eliminated from the anagrams list. The controlled variables are that the participants were the same age group so that the participants did not feel uneasy about being the oldest or youngest which could have affected their performance, were told to sit individually to avoid copying or any discussion about the task, the time was set at two minutes to solve the anagrams and two minutes to recall them and both the groups were given the same words as anagrams. Participants: It is an opportunity sample, 10 participants were found, 5 boys and 5 girls to avoid gender bias and they were also of mixed ethnicity to avoid any racial discrimination which were other control measures. The participants were not told what they were going to do in the experiment. ...read more.


Experimenter bias could have occurred as the experimenters were in the same room as the participants so could have had an effect on their performance. Some theoretical problems could be that the same anagrams as Tyler used in his experiment were not used so the results are not the same. The theory suggests that the more effort put in to solve the anagrams leads to better recall but 'can the amount of effort be measured?' Everyone does not use the same effort for a given task there are bound to be individual differences. Also time is another variable, as people tend to take longer on difficult tasks so is it that they spend more time so the task becomes easy? Or is it that more effort is used in that time? From this it can be seen that the amount of effort and length of time spent to solve the anagrams are confounding variables. The experiment lacks ecological validity as the results cannot be generalised to real life. If further research was to be done taking different age groups into consideration may show different results as their vocabulary maybe more developed so easier for them to solve anagrams. People from different backgrounds i.e. socio-economic status could show a different result as those from a higher socio-economic status may have better education and knowledge than someone from a lower social-economic status. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    Distinctiveness Memory traces that are distinctive or unique in some way will be more memorable than memory traces that closely resemble others. Eysenck and Eysnck (1980) tested this theory by using nouns having irregular grapheme-phoneme correspondence (i.e. words not pronounced in line in line with punctuation rules, such as "comb" with its silent 'b').


    Duplicates of the information will not be made as this will increase the chance of an unauthorised person viewing it. The experimenter will ensure that his conduct is professional in this study, following and checking all BPS ethical issues guidelines.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    The definition of memory is the storage of information over a certain period of time therefore it will be examined how information is recalled from short-term memory. What will be tested is how information is recalled and whether mistakes will be made; a distraction will be added therefore possibly resulting in recall being affected.

  2. Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using ...

    would be 'cat'), 30 of these words were randomly selected, without looking at the list to try to limit extraneous variables. The list was then checked to see if it looked adequate. It is important to limit extraneous variables because they make the results produced less valid.

  1. This study is based on the theory of cue dependent forgetting - more specifically, ...

    dependent variable is in fact influenced by the change in the independent variable is difficult. Another reason for choosing this experimental method is its reliability as it can easily be replicated. An independent measures design was used. This meant testing two groups, one for recall in the same environment where

  2. An experiment to investigate whether chunking leads to better recall.

    However when the latter were also given category headings their recall improved. This shows how cues can guide us to information in our memory we were otherwise unable to access. Rationale This experiment was undertaken to discover whether "chunking" leads to better recall.

  1. Will participants have a better recall of words when they are presented in an ...

    The second group were asked to free recall. The group which were given the category headings recalled more words; suggesting that organisation into categories aids memory retrieval. Bower (1969) also studied the effects of organisation on memory. Again participants were split into two groups.

  2. Images are recalled better than words

    Hypothesis The experimental hypothesis of this study is that images are recalled better than words. I will be using the level of significance p=0.05. a repeated measures design will be used . Method Apparatus PowerPoint presentation Lab room Plain sheets of paper Computer interactive white board pencils Participants In order

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work