• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of this study will be to see if gender effects the rate of conformity.

Extracts from this document...


Psychology Coursework-Coursework Project Brief Identify the aim of the research and state the experimental / alternative and null hypothesis. The aim of this study will be to see if gender effects the rate of conformity, because Jenness's 1932 study didn't take gender in to account and he only used male participants, assuming that female rates or conformity were the same as male ones. This study will replicate Jenness's 1932 study. The experimental hypothesis for this study will be that there will be a difference between participants according to thier gender. This should be evaluated by a one tailed test, using a nominal level of significance. The null hypothesis will be that gender will not effect the rate of conformity.This should be evaluated by a two tailed test, using a nominal level of significance. Explain why a directional or a non directional experimental / alternative hypothesis has been chosen. A non directional hypothesis has ben selected because it has been predicted that there will be a difference or correlation between the two variables, but the direction of the difference has not been stated. Identify the chosen research method and the research design chosen. An independant groups design will be used, along with experimental method. The advantages are that it can be replicated and the variables can be controlled, and that different poeple will be asked. The disadvantages are that it is artificial, and so people may not tell the truth. ...read more.


When they were asked in groups, thier answers became the same, althoughthey were not told to work in groups together, which created a norm, that is necesary in ambigous situations. The fact that the group norm rapidly replaced that of the personal norm, shows the existance of social influence. Asch Participants were asked to judge thelength of the line in comparison with a test card, which was shown to them. the first five people were confederates of the experimenter answered the questions wrong in order to see if the sixth person would conform, and give an obvious wrong answer, because those previous had done so. The findings were that thirty-two percent conformed on a regular basis, seventy five conformed at least once, twenty-five did not conform at all, and five percent conformed all the time. Jenness Jenness asked individual students to estimate the number of beans in a jam jar, and then arranged them to discuss thier guesses. Later when asked to give thier answers again, he found that thier answers were alot closer to that of the rest of the groups. All of the above studies used only male participants, so the results can't be generalised. My study will not only include females but will compare males to females to see if it is acceptable to generalise male results to the whole population. The findings of all the above research will relate to my study as it gives me an insight into conformity, and I can try to avoid problems by studing them first. ...read more.


This was also confirmedwhen these values were plotted on a graph, which again showed no relation of difference between males and females. This experiment was very similar to that of Jenness. Like Jenness's participants, those who took part in this experiment were not asked in groups but individually, and confidentiality was maintained at all times. However this investigation set out to find the difference in conformity rates according to gender, whereas Jenness was not, as he only experimented with male participants. Jenness generalised which was wrong, however my research shows that he was justified in doing so. Both experiments were carried out in the same way. There may also be complications and limitations as the participants I tested, were people from Birmingham and therefore would not have any way seeing if there was a national differences or regional differences a in conformity between the sexes. Also because I only studied people in a small community, no major generalisations could be made using this data. Follow Up studies could include a study into different nationalities to see how conformity changes in diferent societies e.g collecrtivist and individualists, and also the naivity people, and it's change as we move along the globe. CONCLUSIONS From the results it is clear to see that gender does not effect the rate of conformity (null hypothesis), as thier wasn't a big difference between male and female answers. This can clearly be seen on the above graphs and the tables. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Coursework - Conformity

    4 star(s)

    Variables The only thing that will change throughout this investigation is the gender of the participants, with 10 males and 10 females being asked. When we've collected all 20 questionnaires in I will work out how many questions were conformed in and therefore that's what will be measured.

  2. The matching hypothesis

    Also males may feel uneasy about judging another male's attractiveness as they might then be referred to as 'gay' in today's society. Moving onto the female participants, who (bar 2 photographs) rated the female in the couple higher than the males.

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    Under conditions where the problem is less obvious, then people are likely to go with the majority of the group. Levels of conformity are likely to increase if the status of the people in the rest of the group is high; low status people are likely to conform more to

  2. Psychology First Impression

    a student with an ordinary name as opposed to an unusual or unpopular name as opposed to when they were led to believe that the child had an unusual or unpopular name. Apparently, the teachers were influenced in their decision by the name that was on the paper.

  1. An Investigation to see whether the halo effect is present when rating personality ...

    The minimum level of significance is p<0.05 was set as this offers the best compromise between making a Type 1 and a Type 2 error. Other reasons for using this test are that the data collected was ordinal, i.e. there were participant's individual scores for rating attractiveness and this data can be placed into rank order in a meaningful way.

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    group and the control group. Give one reason why such physiological data in the study should be treated with caution. Two differences between the real life experiences of persons who experience an accident and the study conducted by Loftus and Palmer are as follows.

  1. Physiological Arousal and its Effects on Females interpretations of physical attractiveness

    2.06 U 4.56 6.44 W 1.83 1.78 X 3.44 3.39 Y 3.44 3.78 Z 1.83 1.83 Before After Mean 3.62 3.22 Range 6.27 5.33 Mode 3.44 2.06 Median 3.33 2.45 Total 43.38 38.62 Sign Test When N=11, to be statistically significant at p=<0.05, X must be equal to or lower than 1.

  2. Conformity discussion.

    In some cases the participants estimated the same answer in which case the rank given to that score became the mean of the ranks involved. A one tailed test was used to establish significance because the experimental hypothesis was directional.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work