• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience In Social Influence Conformity involves the changing of ones attitudes, opinions or behaviours to match those of others. Aronson (1988) defines it ' as a change in a persons behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people.' The pressure to act like other people, sometimes despite our true feelings and desires, is a common everyday occurrence. Although the majority of people like to think of themselves as autonomous individuals, they nevertheless tend to conform to the social norms that their groups and societies have evolved. Obedience is the result of a deliberate or active form of social influence, which involves an authority figure telling us how to behave in a particular way. If we obey we are complying with the authority figure's request or instruction. According to Milgram (1992) conformity and obedience involve the 'abdication of individual judgement in the face of some external social pressure' however there are some important differences. When we are conforming there is no explicit request to act in a certain way, yet when we obey we are instructed to do something. Conformity is when we are being influenced by equal - status peers, where as with obedience there is always a difference in status. ...read more.

Middle

When the majority was only two confederates the conformity responses dropped significantly. Optimum conformity affects were found when there was a majority of three confederates. If the majority was raised above this number, no significant increases were found. According to Asch 'a unanimous majority of three is, under the given conditions, far more effective than a majority of containing one dissenter.' Some critics thought the high levels of conformity found by Asch were a reflection of American 1950's culture. Crutchfield quoted ' It was time - consuming and uneconomical and the tasks set were not like real life situations.' Other research indicates that conformity varies depending on the consistency of the confederates' judgements - the greater the consistency shown, the greater the conformity of the na�ve participant and vice versa. Cultural factors also play a part. Research on conformity in different countries has found some variations but in general there are quite high levels of conformity wherever research is carried out. After considering a fairly subtle approach to pressure, what exactly differs between conforming and obedience? There have been some controversial experiments on obedience and how people react to being given quite specific instructions. A famous example showing conformity and obedience was the experiment Zimbardo (1973) ...read more.

Conclusion

Milgrams work has been criticised both on ethical and methodological grounds. Baumrind (1964) believed that Milgram showed insufficient respect for his participants, there were insufficient steps taken to protect them, and his procedures could have long term effects on the participants. Orne and Holland (1968) argued that the participants did not believe they were giving electric shocks and they were just playing along with their role in the study. It is of some comfort to report that studies of the Milgram type have been carried out in other parts of the world with some quite different results. They have shown that obedience, in certain conditions, can be minimal. The main factor that enabled the individual to resist is if he had an experimental accomplice who refused to obey instructions as well. Just like in the Asch study if there is support from another individual, it can make a crucial difference. Conformity and obedience represents a form of social influence in which our peers or an authority figure steers us. What people can learn from all of this is pressure to conform or obey is not easy. Standing alone in social groups or cultures is a very difficult thing for most people. If there is no support, we need to look for it This seems to provide the strength to resist those in authority or group pressure if we are encouraged to question the motives of those who are steering us. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Coursework - Conformity

    4 star(s)

    not have necessarily conformed but just got the wrong answer, therefore the results would not be valid. Even though conformity is an everyday occurrence and that the results show that people do conform the research method of questionnaires does lack mundane realism.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate psychological research into conformity and obedience in humans, and consider ways ...

    4 star(s)

    They concluded that the Asch effect appears to be an unpredictable phenomenon rather than a stable tendency of human behaviour. Zimbardo et al (1973) conducted one of the best known and most controversial studies of conformity in a basement of Yale University.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    Current affairs: A good current affair example of conformity could be the incidents which took place in Abu Ghraib which I discussed in detail within task 1.It is possible that not all the soldiers that got involved in these horrendous activities would of done this if they hadn't felt a group pressure to do so.

  2. Conformity & Obedience to Authority.

    went all the way in steps to the maximum shock levels, and without exception, all of the subjects went as high as 300 volts. After this it became quite alarming that a significant amount of people could inflict harm on others to such an extent and this gave rise to

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    DISCUSSION. Participants who saw the list of false estimates were closer to the mean of the false estimates, therefore agreeing with the original hypothesis. It is now possible to reject the null hypothesis in favour of the experimental, this being 'Participants will be influenced by a fictitious list on a faceless conformity task.'

  2. Evaluation of Milgram's Obedience Study

    Milgram argues against this point by saying that he reunited the teacher and learner at the end of the experiment to show that the teacher had not inflicted any harm, this revealed the true intention of the experiment.

  1. Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical?

    Asch went on to test out different conditions on levels of conformity using the same set up. His method became known as the Asch paradigm. Asch concluded that various factors can affect the level of conformity: 1. Three 'stooges' produced maximum levels of conformity.

  2. Conformity and Obedience

    Variations on Milgram's experiment have been conducted by other researchers with the sample taken from different cultures notably a study by Shanab and Yahya(1977) which took place in Jordan with college students. There were two groups, one group were ordered to issue shocks and the other group were given the free choice on whether to deliver shocks.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work