• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience In Social Influence Conformity involves the changing of ones attitudes, opinions or behaviours to match those of others. Aronson (1988) defines it ' as a change in a persons behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people.' The pressure to act like other people, sometimes despite our true feelings and desires, is a common everyday occurrence. Although the majority of people like to think of themselves as autonomous individuals, they nevertheless tend to conform to the social norms that their groups and societies have evolved. Obedience is the result of a deliberate or active form of social influence, which involves an authority figure telling us how to behave in a particular way. If we obey we are complying with the authority figure's request or instruction. According to Milgram (1992) conformity and obedience involve the 'abdication of individual judgement in the face of some external social pressure' however there are some important differences. When we are conforming there is no explicit request to act in a certain way, yet when we obey we are instructed to do something. Conformity is when we are being influenced by equal - status peers, where as with obedience there is always a difference in status. ...read more.

Middle

When the majority was only two confederates the conformity responses dropped significantly. Optimum conformity affects were found when there was a majority of three confederates. If the majority was raised above this number, no significant increases were found. According to Asch 'a unanimous majority of three is, under the given conditions, far more effective than a majority of containing one dissenter.' Some critics thought the high levels of conformity found by Asch were a reflection of American 1950's culture. Crutchfield quoted ' It was time - consuming and uneconomical and the tasks set were not like real life situations.' Other research indicates that conformity varies depending on the consistency of the confederates' judgements - the greater the consistency shown, the greater the conformity of the na�ve participant and vice versa. Cultural factors also play a part. Research on conformity in different countries has found some variations but in general there are quite high levels of conformity wherever research is carried out. After considering a fairly subtle approach to pressure, what exactly differs between conforming and obedience? There have been some controversial experiments on obedience and how people react to being given quite specific instructions. A famous example showing conformity and obedience was the experiment Zimbardo (1973) ...read more.

Conclusion

Milgrams work has been criticised both on ethical and methodological grounds. Baumrind (1964) believed that Milgram showed insufficient respect for his participants, there were insufficient steps taken to protect them, and his procedures could have long term effects on the participants. Orne and Holland (1968) argued that the participants did not believe they were giving electric shocks and they were just playing along with their role in the study. It is of some comfort to report that studies of the Milgram type have been carried out in other parts of the world with some quite different results. They have shown that obedience, in certain conditions, can be minimal. The main factor that enabled the individual to resist is if he had an experimental accomplice who refused to obey instructions as well. Just like in the Asch study if there is support from another individual, it can make a crucial difference. Conformity and obedience represents a form of social influence in which our peers or an authority figure steers us. What people can learn from all of this is pressure to conform or obey is not easy. Standing alone in social groups or cultures is a very difficult thing for most people. If there is no support, we need to look for it This seems to provide the strength to resist those in authority or group pressure if we are encouraged to question the motives of those who are steering us. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Coursework - Conformity

    4 star(s)

    Reliability This research method of questionnaire lacks reliability for various reasons, as the extent of what the questionnaires measure does not really refer to measuring conformity consistently. Reasons for this lack of reliability include the lack of a standardised procedure.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate psychological research into conformity and obedience in humans, and consider ways ...

    4 star(s)

    Their aim was to create the functional equivalent to a prison to study what affect it can have on 'normal, well balanced' peoples behaviour. Zimbardo recruited twenty-five male volunteers to participate in a two week study of real life; they were to be paid for everyday they stayed.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    Obedience: Obedience can be easily confused with conformity and sometimes the meaning can seem very similar but the main difference is that in obedience differently to conformity you are actually instructed to do something and what you personally think about it or is you disagree is irrelevant whereas in conformity

  2. Conformity & Obedience to Authority.

    The teacher was not bullied into carrying on, but rather obeyed the calm requests of the "authority figure." At one point the subjects were heard to laugh at the point where the learner appeared to be in severe pain. Milgram explained that this was not because they thought the situation

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    If participants guessed over this amount, they conformed. From the raw data table 2, you can see that 70% of people conformed in this experiment. The experimental group identified with the fictitious list more than the control group did. DISCUSSION.

  2. Evaluation of Milgram's Obedience Study

    Milgram responds by saying that he did not intend stress or harm to be caused. However he is strongly criticised because he continued variations of the experiment even though it was clearly harming the participant.

  1. Compare and contrast the studies of Sherif and Asch. What do they tell us ...

    This is not seen in Asch's experiment which heavily emphasises group conformity. Sherif (1935) played an essential role by experimentally indicating how group norms can form. In particular, he showed that people who made judgements in a group setting communally developed perceptual standards (judgements of the apparent movement of a point of light in a darkened room)

  2. Critically Evaluate Research Into Conformity, Compliance and Obedience.

    Asch (1951) criticised Sherif's experiment on the grounds that the experiment was too ambiguous which made it difficult to outline any definite conclusions about there bring conformity. Another criticism of Sherif's experiment is that he used deception as he told the participants the light was moving when it was not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work