• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Differing Reactions of People in Britain to the Policy of Evacuating Children in World War II

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Differing Reactions of People in Britain to the Policy of Evacuating Children in World War II It became apparent that in the 1930's, air raids had become a more dominant spectre in the minds of both the government and the public. The widespread fear of mass German bombing since September 1939 had destroyed morale, as well as many families. Therefore, the British government planned for the evacuation of civilians from the more probable target areas of Britain, in an attempt to save them. The country had been divided into zones classified as either 'evacuation', 'neutral' or 'reception'. This allowed priority evacuees to be moved from major urban areas to those more rural. However, as lists of the available housing in the 'reception' areas were compiled, an error was found in that there was not enough housing for everyone. Therefore, the government had to also construct temporary camps. Many people were also sent abroad, as it was considered safer for them, to places as far as 'Canada and America'. Nevertheless, the government began posting letters to those households seen in the greatest danger. Officially being evacuated were children of school age, mothers accompanying young children, pregnant women, disabled people and teachers. However, other prominent groups were also evacuated such as civil servants, art treasures, the Bank of England and the BBC, as a few examples. ...read more.

Middle

As no one kept any official records of where each child had been placed, no one could punish the families for such actions, a great fault in the whole system. This also meant that when it came to returning the children home, many families were not prepared to give up the children they had taken on. One reason for this could have been for the labour, whilst another could have been that a strong relationship amongst the new family meant letting the child go felt impossible. This was common in the case of younger children as they would not remember their previous families. Generally, there was a mixed opinion about the system of evacuation amongst children. Many children had a great experience and had gained much from it, for example new friends. It was these children that when the war came to an end, would have hesitated to leave their new lives but nevertheless, wanted to return to their parents and family in the cities. On the contrary, many children would have been eager to return home as their countryside lives terrified them. For many, it may have been a lower standard of living or for others, the families they were staying with. It is necessary to state that the accounts given of evacuation were greatly influenced by memory. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nevertheless, the thought of living with strangers and not knowing the welfare of your own parents may have been tarnishing for many children, especially those who were older. This may have affected the way they chose to remember the experience, or even how they chose to live it. Initially, many parents did not agree with the policy of evacuation. The thought of not being able to protect their own families scared many people. However, once many children arrived back home after the war, they realised that maybe evacuation wasn't as bad as they thought. Many children came back home healthy, happy and with a life-changing experience. However, for other parents, seeing their children again may have confirmed their worst fears, as they came back miserable and brandished by their time as an evacuee. Also, there were many parents who never saw their children again. Although they had been evacuated, no official records were kept and therefore, many children were not brought back home. Many others involved in the scheme of evacuation were also greatly affected. Those who stayed closely with the children, for example teachers, would have seen the pain of the children without their parents. This may have led them to change their views on the policy. Whilst, those who cared for the children would have only truly understood its effects on their lives once the war was over, when even those who may not have appeared to enjoy it realise what they'd lost. ?? ?? ?? ?? Reena Achall ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Explain the differing reactions of British people to the policy of evacuating children during ...

    I think towards the end of the war host families and children's reactions changed. I think after a few months of living where they were host families enjoyed the children's company and the children enjoyed helping their host family's work on their farms and the countryside as a whole.

  2. Child Labour.

    Many parents are unemployed and giving the jobs to the parents will let the family earn more money (Free the children 3). The problem of this solution would be employers not happy because they need to pay more for the adults working and the problems they have to deal with.

  1. I have decided to do my portfolio on Beaufort Park School, for several reasons. ...

    inspection of day care and childminding, as previously they were regulated by local authorities, which set their own criteria and procedures. OFSTED check that childminders meet the national standards, and as a result parents can be confident in the standard of childcare wherever they live.

  2. Is Homework Beneficial to Children in Any way?

    The research that the DFEE claim proves the worth of homework was carried out by OFSTED in 1995. Some question the reliability of this data, as OFSTED are a government-funded body. However, they visited 19 primary schools and from this published a report, that the governments guidelines said, confirmed their reasons for appointing homework.

  1. In Britain today, most people live in nuclear families - The aim of this ...

    As there has been an overall increases in single parent families I will look closely at the statistics to try and determine why this has occurred. A large part of the increase was due to divorce in the mid-1980s. But more recently the number of single lone mothers has grown

  2. Is the landowner the driving force in urban redevelopment?

    strategies renders the predictable observation that owners whose main business lay in property were much more likely to encourage development than those to whom property was peripheral to their main activities (Adams, et. al. 2002:146). If the rigorous empirical framework employed by Adams et.

  1. Attentive Minds

    While finding these essayists in a room together may be a little far fetched, saying that finding your identity is an amazing thing is not, and since Frazier and Kappel-Smith have, they embrace their present being. Their pasts are looked at quite differently, and as far as the future goes, there are differences as well as similarities.

  2. 'Are Mothers Necessary?'

    One personality trait that Kegan found is shyness and extremely shy children have abnormally low stress thresholds, therefore inborn temperament could be partly responsible for the way babies respond in the strange situation. Another more predominant factor is the nature and quality of the infant - caregiver relationship the amount

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work