• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Effect Chunking of Numbers has on Short-Term Memory Recall.

Extracts from this document...


The Effect Chunking of Numbers has on Short-Term Memory Recall. Introduction In this experiment, the cognitive approach was investigated, focusing on the study of memory within it. Chunking, a technique used to extend short-term memory capacity was studied. Miller (1956) suggested that we can hold 7(2 pieces of information in our short-term memory, which lasts for approximately 10-30 seconds. However, the amount of information stored in each unit or "chunk" varies. He proposed that STM would improve if long strings of information can be chunked into sections so that more can be stored. For example, the letters "m, e, m, o, r, y" can be chunked into the word "memory", reducing the number of chunks from six to one. Information would be also easier to retain when put into units that have more meaning to people, ex. FBI, BBC, CIA, etc. Bower (1969) studied the difference in recall of the same words in 1, 2 and 3 word phrases. Results showed that organised material was learnt 2-3 times quicker than disorganised. Disorganised material took longer because people need time to identify the relationships between the words, while this would be already presented to them in the organised material. This shows people have natural mechanisms to chunk information into units to increase their learning capacities and that chunking of information into an organised structure aids recall of information. ...read more.


Apparatus The experiment was carried out in different surroundings. Participants were seated. A list of numbers (see appendix 1) was read out for the test of recall in two conditions. Numbers in condition one was read one by one, with pauses in equal lengths between each letter. Letters in condition two were chunked into groups of three letters and read with pauses of equal lengths between each chunk. Procedure 1. 1. Participants were selected using the opportunistic method of sampling. 2. 2. A set of standardised instructions was read out to them (see appendix 1). 3. 3. Condition one: A list of numbers (not chunked) was read by the participants who had to try and remember as many of them as possible in the same order. 4. 4. Participants were given two minutes to try and recall as many numbers from the list-in the correct order. 5. Participants were given two minutes to try and recall as many letters from the list-in the correct order. 6. 7. Lastly, participants were debriefed (see appendix 2) Controls The same group of people were not tested in both conditions to eliminate the possibility of one condition affecting another. Students and adults, living in the same country were selected. ...read more.


However, the sample used in this experiment may be harder to repeat in different locations as it was from a very small target population. Participants have to be from Park lane college and surrounding area so it cannot be repeated in other countries It also lacked internal reliability, as memory is a very subjective thing. We cannot go inside someone's head to read their thoughts and look through their memories. Therefore, it cannot be certain that results showed exactly what participants remembered, as they may leave out some information deliberately. Improving reliability This could be improved by increasing the sample size. More participants could be used so results are more representative of the target population, ex. using a sample of 50. However, the process of collecting data with such a big sample becomes more difficult, as it would be hard to control them and make them do the experiment in absolute silence. Appendices Appendix 1: Standard instruction Appendix 2: Debriefing Appendix 2: Debriefing Thank you for participating in this experiment. You have just participated in an experiment investigating the effects chunking has on information recall of the short term memory You may cancel your results if you wish to. If you have any queries about this experiment or wish to gain further information about this study, you are welcome to ask me. Good bye. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Define short-term memory and describe the main factors that influence the number of items ...

    4 star(s)

    Baddeley stated that the rehearsal process became responsible for producing word length effects and that it was a limiting factor on performance. According to Tehan and Lalor (2000 [6]), there is substantial empirical support for the two-component theory shown in Baddeley et al's demonstration in 1975 that memory span was in fact related to the spoken duration of words.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Memory Process. This paper will describe a memory test using numbers, letters, and ...

    3 star(s)

    Long Term Memory The continual storage of information is referred to as long term memory. Long term memory is typified as concerning semantic encoding, in particular, recalling the definition or understanding of a word as opposed to the literal word (Terry, 2009).

  1. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    OF WORDS RECALLED WITHOUT INTERFERENCE (Condition A) NO. OF WORDS RECALLED WITH INTERFERENCE (Condition B) ONE 6 5 TWO 4 3 THREE 2 7 FOUR 9 6 FIVE 5 4 SIX 5 5 SEVEN 7 5 EIGHT 5 8 NINE 6 3 TEN 3 5 Participant three's results more than trebled in condition B, whereas participant nine's results halved in condition B.

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    Any difference in recall will be due to chance factors. This means that any difference in the dependant variable, this being the recall amount is not due to the independent variable and that it is due to chance factors. Therefore the distraction of music has not affected the results.

  1. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    This process of recoding the input into a higher-level more compact form is what Miller meant by chunking. Chunking is not reserved for unusual situations like memorizing long strings of ones and zeros, but appears to be widely used. For example a word can be considered a higher-level code (chunk)

  2. The effect of chunking on memory recall in STM.

    If that information is then rehearsed it can then be entered into the long term memory. If rehearsal does not occur than the information is forgotten Long before Atkinson and Shiffrin developed the multi-store memory modal Ebbinghaus (1885) maintained that the short term memory is limited to six or seven pieces of information.

  1. The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall

    The stronger that the distracter was to the material to be memorised than the more severe this effect was. The recency effect is greater for auditory than visually presented material. This is called the modality effects. It has been shown that if an irrelevant item is spoken at the end

  2. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    By grouping in three's there are three groups (chunks) but grouping in pairs there are five chunks. Simons (1974) established that the size of the chunk did have an effect on memory. He found that fewer longer chunks, such as eight word phrases, were recalled compared to the shorter chunks, one syllable words.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work