• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

The effect of chunking on memory recall in STM.

Extracts from this document...


Psychology Chunking Abstract[L1] In this report I have investigated Miller's chunking theory and whether that increases the amount of information that can be stored in the short term memory. The aim of this experiment is to investigate whether chunking does improve the amount of memory the short term memory can hold. The hypothesis is in a test of short term memory recall involving 10 participants who had to remember and recall 5 chunked mobile phone numbers and 5 un-chunked mobile phone numbers. Participants who used the chunking method will score higher than participants who didn't use the chunking method. My research method is an experiment. I was able to accept my hypothesis and as a result I can say that Ebbinghaus was in fact wrong in saying that the short term memory can only hold six or seven pieces of information because with the chunking method it can hold more than that. So Miller was right the short term memory can hold 7+/-2 pieces of information. Generally people find information easier to remember if it is in smaller chunks rather than great streams of information. Background information Erika Cox wrote that memory has three main processes. Registration is where the sense organs identify information and enter it into the memory system. Storage is the process by which information is kept in the memory and finally retrieval is the process by which information in memory can be recovered. ...read more.


Chunked means that the mobile numbers will be read out in smaller groups rather than all eleven numbers at once. So I will be reading the numbers out in 1 group of 5 and 2 groups of 3. There will be slight pauses in between each group of numbers. Un-chunked means that the numbers will simply be read out without any breaks in between each number. The dependant variable is how much of the mobile number is recalled in the right order. The extraneous variable is that when I read the numbers out to the participants my voice might change pitch between each participant. I might not be able to keep exactly the same amount of time between each number as I read them. I will control this by recording my voice speaking all 10 chunked and un chunked numbers and then playing this recording back to each participant. They will all hear the same recording which means there will be no change in pitch, tone of voice and time in between each number. Participants The target population is 16-18 year old students studying A levels. The sampling method I will be using is opportunity sampling which means that the sample is selected on the basis of who is available at the time of testing and willing to take part. I am using this sampling method because it is the quickest and easiest way to take a sample. ...read more.


My experiment also supports Attkinson and Shiffrin's idea that information is not rehearsed then it is forgotten. Summary and Conclusions My research could be taken on and used in the real world. For example A limitation of my experiment was that I only tested British people between the age of 16-18. Therefore my results haven't got a very broad variety of different ages or cultures and are not very representative. These results only represent a very small group of people. I could have improved my experiment by drawing from a wider variety of different people. Testing people of all different ages and ethnic persuasions would have given me a broader and more representative set of results. Further research you could carry out following my experiment is whether recall was better when hearing a recording of a woman's voice a opposed to a mans voice. This would be interesting research as participants 1,2,4,5 and 10 on average got lower scores on both chunked and un-chunked than participants 3,6,7,8,and 9. Participants 1,2,4,5 and 10 were male and participants 3,6,7,8 and 9 were female. So on average the girls got higher test results than the boys. Maybe this was because the girls found listening to a man's voice more appealing and therefore found it easier to remain focused. Maybe the male participants found the man's voice less appealing as opposed to a woman's voice and therefore found it more difficult to remain focused. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. The Effect Chunking of Numbers has on Short-Term Memory Recall.

    This was selected because it brings advantages such as the control of extraneous variables, which enables cause and effect to be established. Findings can also be repeated by others, increasing reliability of results. Participants were tested in two conditions, making it a repeated measures design.

  2. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall


  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    Instead 20+ participants could be used. A bigger sample of participants could also be used, which will give more representative results. It could also be suggested that more complex words should be added to the word list, as this would challenge participants more as simpler words with few letters are generally easy to remember.

  2. The Stroop Effect

    A way to overcome this would be clearer instructions in the standardised instructions to what to do if someone makes a mistake. Implications and Suggestions This research has many implications for the wider society; one of these has been put to practical use within the law very recently.

  1. Psychology Coursework

    In support, Godden and Baddeley (1975) carried out an experiment where divers were asked to learn words either on land or fifteen feet underwater. Divers were then required to recall the words, either on land or underwater. Their findings supported those of previous studies, as there was a decline in

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    For example in remembering a phone number you tend to learn groups of digits rather than a single string of numbers. Another experiment carried out on chunking was conducted by Herbert Simon (1974). He presented himself with a list of words and found he could not recall them correctly after just one presentation.

  1. The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall

    of a list, the recency effect is reduced for auditory but not for visually presented lists. This is called the suffix effect. Many other factors can adversely affect short term memory recall. For example, Banbury, Macken, Tremblay and Jones (2001)

  2. Stroop Effect

    Opportunity sample was used. This made is convenient for the researcher because the random sampling will require to much time. Some of the participants were from a secondary school on 6th from students and household relations. All participants were made sure to have no background knowledge on Stroop or the Stroop effect otherwise this will affect the results.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work