The effect of TV violence on young people

Authors Avatar
The effect of TV violence on young people

In this essay I will assess whether violence on television causes violence in society. This is such a common claim that most people believe that it simply must be true. However there is no proof although some sociologists suggest that there is a relationship between the two.

Teenagers are constantly being bombarded with so-called 'parental warnings' and 'film certificates' which intend to provide us with guidance on what we should and should not be watching, if it be on the box or at the cinema. Many politicians try to convince us that television is bad for us, a device which 'corrodes the moral values of society and corrupts children with relentless images of violence'. Is this a fair and accurate statement? Or merely a harsh and unfair account of what TV provides us with?

52 % of children aged 5-17 spend most of their day glued to the 'box' including me. I believe that the content on TV does not contain much violent content as it is thought to have. TV broadcasters usually kick off with a small dose of daytime entertainment, comprising mainly of DIY and gardening make over shows until the afternoon after which children's programmes are shown. Programmes which are broadcasted on terrestrial TV have to comply with strict regulations before they are shown to the public-this is the job of the independent television commission (ITC). The ITC have strong views on programmes of a violent or unsuitable nature and have the power to control when certain programmes are shown. Ones that can be considered violent containing scenes of gore etc are shown later in the night and may be issued with a warning to the parent informing them of content. This is where I believe the role of the parent should be more prominent. Content on TV cannot just cater for children and teenagers but for adults as well which is why such programmes are shown later. I believe it is the parent's responsibility to be able to control what their children watch and people should generally be less forceful in blaming TV on a whole.
Join now!


Some people may argue that it cannot be denied that what appears on screen has no effect because multi-millions of pounds are being spent on advertising. However the purpose of advertising is to persuade people to buy products-it rarely tries to change people's behaviour, and when it does it usually does not work for example the very long-running campaigns trying to persuade people not to drink and drive which had virtually no effect. The government faces a similar problem today with young smokers who seem quite resistant to health messages to help them quit.

There are ...

This is a preview of the whole essay