• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

Extracts from this document...


Method Design A laboratory experiment was used for this piece of research. This was chosen as in these settings there is a high degree of control for the researcher who is more able to control variables for a more effective and reliable piece of research. Also these types of experiments are usually easier to replicate if results need to be checked or reaffirmed. It is also easier to avoid extraneous or confounding variables, which could affect results. Examples of extraneous variables that could arise in this experiment could be distractions in the room where the experiment may take place, individual differences e.g. the moods of the participants may vary etc. To avoid this, the two conditions were set in the same room at the same time of day. This room was as devoid of colour and distraction as was possible in attempts to keep the participants on focussing on the task at hand. Other factors that could have affected the status/mood of the participant could have been weather or temperature. This was also avoided by keeping participants indoors in a classroom. This classroom had air conditioning facilities, these ensured that the room was kept at a comfortable temperature to avoid distraction. ...read more.


When participants entered the room were told that they were participating in a psychological experiment on eyewitness testimony. Participants were not told the exact nature of the experiment. This measure was taken to avoid demand characteristics, to ensure that participant's answers and behaviours are genuine. One condition entered the room. Each participant was allocated a seat, one space away from the other. In front of each participant was an overturned questionnaire form with normal questions. Standardised instructions were read out to participants by the researcher prior to the start of the experiment. Participants then watched a 3-minute video/DVD clip. After this they were given 2 minutes to complete their questionnaires. The half of the first condition was given the questionnaire with leading questions and the other half was given the questionnaire with non-leading questions. This was repeated for the second condition. After questionnaires had been collected the participants were debriefed. Here they were informed of the true nature of the experiment and any doubts and ill feeling were reassured to the participants. An opportunity was then presented for participants to put forward any queries they may have had about the study. Results were checked to find which group gave the most correct answers. ...read more.


4. The participants should be asked to be silent and the following should be said: "Welcome and thank you for participating in this experiment. This is an investigation into eye witness testimony. Please do not turn over the question paper in front of you until you are asked to do so. A three minute clip will be played for you. Please watch this clip carefully as you will later be questioned on it. You will have 3 minutes to answer the questions after the clip, after which we will ask you to stop writing and return your question papers to us. Do you have any questions? (at this point any queries should be taken and addressed to the best of the researchers ability, without giving away the true purpose of the experiment)" 5. The clip should then be played in the view of all participants in the condition. After this clip is played participants should then answer all questions, this should all be done in silence. 6. After the three minute answer period has ended the questionnaires should be collected by the researcher(s) and participants should be debriefed. The true nature of the experiment should be revealed and the participants should be put at ease about their involvement. 7. This procedure should be followed with the second condition however the questionnaire without leading questions should be used. ?? ?? ?? ?? Year 13 - Psychology Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Psychology Coursework

    This process is known as 'redintegration' and is based upon the principles of people retrieving whole memories when thinking about the whole context. Context-dependent forgetting is when external cues from the environment are missing. One of the first studies that examined the effects of context retrieval by carried out by Greenspoon and Ranyard (1957).

  2. A Study to Investigate Whether Leading Questions have an Effect on Memory

    Introduction I am conducting an experiment based in the psychological field of cognition and law. I will be exploring how leading questions can effect how accurately a person recalls an event. A leading question is a question that suggests to the individual the desired answer by its form or content.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Their experiment involved showing 30 participants a room one by one, each person stayed in the room for 35 seconds. The room they entered appeared like an office, containing 61 items- some that one would expect in an office (e.g.

  2. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    7 1.7 2.89 14 6 0.4 0.16 24 8 -0.6 0.36 5 10 -1.3 1.69 15 10 -3.6 12.96 25 8 -0.6 0.36 6 7 1.7 2.89 16 7 -0.6 0.36 26 7 0.4 0.16 7 8 0.7 0.49 17 6 0.4 0.16 27 6 1.4 1.96 8 10 -1.3

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    the 'War of the Ghosts'). Bartlett found that participants had changed the story they heard considerably, making it shorter and more like their own language e.g. "boats" replaced "canoe". Bartlett also found that the distortions increased with time and most of the errors made the story read more like an English story and to make it more coherent.

  2. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    The youngest was 16 and the oldest 18. Conditions were allocated to participants by alternation, whereby odd-numbered participants (1st, 3rd, 5th, ...) were allocated to Condition A (categorised) and even-numbered participants (2nd, 4th, 6th, ...) were allocated to Condition B (randomised).

  1. Memory and Eyewitness Testimony

    One explanation of forgetting in long term memory is the decay theory; this states that memory is lost due to the brain damage or through the aging process if rehearsal is prohibited; if a memory lies dormant for an extended period of time it is likely to be forgotten.

  2. Investigation into the relationship between an individuals precieved ugliness, harmfullness and an individuals fear ...

    The graphs highlight the correlations but there are also some anomalies. Such as polar bear which is seen to be an anomaly on both fear and ugliness graph and ugly and harm graph, because of its low rating of ugliness.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work