• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The "Levels Of Processing Model" focuses on the inter related processes needed for memory - Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


The "Levels Of Processing Model" Focuses On The Inter Related Processes Needed For Memory. Discuss The Levels OF Processing (LOP) Model is an alternative to the Multi Store (MS) Model. It does appreciate the idea that both STM and LTM do exist however it does focus on the inter- related processes needed for memory. It looks at the way information is coded and how likely it is to be remembered depending on the type of coding. The LOP model was based on a study by Craik & Tulving (1875) who tested participants on remembering 4 different types of information. These were called "Levels of Processing. They claimed that the level information is processed at, accounts for how likely it is to be remembered. The 4 levels are as followed: * Shallowest e.g. ...read more.


This is the hardest level of processing. The person taking the test has to understand what kicked and tree means and put an appropriate word into the sentence. This uses deep semantic memory. According to Craik and Lockhart rehearsal was not as essential as LOP. They distinguished between two types of LOP - Simple Maintenance Rehearsal which simply holds information but does not necessarily lead to the transfer into LTM as information is just memorised, and Elaborative Rehearsal which involves some kind of analysis or evaluation of information. This type of rehearsal leads to LTM. This is why it was found that the more complex the stage of processing was (Semantic) the easier the sentence was to remember. E.g. the Deeper semantic test was remembered better than the Shallow because it required more analysis and they were placed in an order in which the words linked together and made sense. ...read more.


We can never be sure what type of memory participants are using to perform tasks because they are that of orientation. However the theory is not explanative of why deep inter related processing is effective and suggests that semantic processing is the only thing that affects LTM. This is very unlikely. Eyzenck criticised the theory for having a narrow view of encoding and proposed 4 general factors as an alternative, which affect learning. These were the nature of the task, the type of material to be remembered, and the knowledge of the subject and the nature of the test. It is also very difficult to measure the accuracy of this experiment because "depth" and elaboration" are such vague terms. It was said that deeply processed information would be remembered better but the depth of processing was how well it was remembered. This once again depends on the inter- related processes used. Natasha Dewji ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    Baddeley (1966) found that if participants were asked to recall words immediately from short-term memory they did not confuse words that had the same meaning, but they often confused words that sounded similar. The opposite was true for long-term memory.

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    Deeply processed items ought to be more distinctively represented in the memory store as well.

  1. Investigating Levels Of Processing Using Images

    Sound of the word 3. Meaning of the word Craik & Tulving (1975) conducted an experiment to investigate the effect different types of processing had upon the amount being able to be recalled. Participants were presented with a list of 60 words and asked to answer one of three questions, asking either about the case, sound or meaning of the word.

  2. How levels of processing affects memory

    It states that if high levels of processing are used to memorise words then more words should be remembered than if the level of processing was low. Craik and Lockhart (1972) were the first to propose that the attentional and perceptual processes during learning determine what information is stored in long-term memory.

  1. Levels Of Processing

    see if semantically processed words are still most deeply processed and remembered best in today's society, hence my aim is similar to theirs, however I will be making a few minor adjustments to it. Firstly, I will conduct a laboratory experiment which was carried out by them; it might not

  2. How effective is the levels of processing model as an explanation of memory?

    This means that the most important way of remembering is to think about the thing we want to remember. The research of Craik and Lockhart changed the direction of memory research. They showed that the encoding and processing of information was not just a simple and straightforward process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work