• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The MSM model of memory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Callum Dunlop 12P3 The MSM model of memory The MSM consists of three unitary stores, the sensory memory (SM), the short-term memory (STM), and the long-term memory (LTM) and is the theoretical explanation of how memory processes work, proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin in 1968. Information is said to pass through the three stages I spoke of earlier in a fixed sequence. At each stage it is suggested that there are capacity and duration limitations and information can be lost from any of the stages. The MSM proposes that the first stage is sensory memory (SM). The name is derived from the fact that the information is auditory, visual, touch, feel ect, basically all the senses. The SM is thought to have a very limited capacity of information from the environment in a relatively unprocessed way, with a duration of less than 2 seconds. Information in the SM is lost through decay and passed on to the STM through attention. The second stage in the MSM is the short-term memory (STM). ...read more.

Middle

The findings were that participants who recalled the list immediately remembered the first and last few words best, participants that recalled the list after a delay only remembered the first few words, and both groups of participants had difficulty recalling words from the middle of the list. The researchers concluded that words from the beginning of the list were remembered because they had entered long term memory (they called this the primacy effect), and words at the end of the list were remembered well in the immediate recall condition because they were still in short term memory (they called this the recency effect). The primacy effect and recency effect can be taken together to provide evidence that human memory has separate short and long term stores, and therefore provides evidence for the validity of the model as it too claims there are separate short term and long term memory stores. Other piece of evidence for the MSM are the cases of HM and Clive Wearing. Both of these patients had severe damage to the areas of their brain that contain the hippocampi (in HM?s case the Hippocampi were removed altogether) ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore the idea of each unitary store being a passive warehouse can simply not be the case as HM clearly retained some long-term memories when he should have lost all of them. Also HM, though unable to make new long-term memories could learn new skills, one example of this was the pursuit rotor task in which he simply had to use a pencil to follow a wavering line on a rotating disc. Each time he was asked to repeat the task he was unable to remember ever having seen the disc before, but on each occasion he became more accurate through practice. HM had therefore learned a new skill, which must be stored in long term memory, and so the idea that long term memory is a single unitary store as represented by the multi store model must be incorrect; there must be more than one type of long term memory. Overall a huge criticism of the MSM is that it is too reductionist to explain the complexities and this is supported by the cases I have already gone over. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    30 participants gave their consent for this investigation. Only 20 participants were needed for this investigation, so the final 20 names of the needed participants were drawn out of a bowl. These 20 names consisted of 10 males and 10 females. Leaving 10 participants unneeded. The 20 selected participants were then put into 2 groups resulting in 5 of each sex in each group.

  2. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    The average number of times words were recalled in the interference experiment was 4.3, compared to a much larger 5.8 in the non-interference experiment. This shows that there is perhaps the possibility that an interference task affects all parts of the memory.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    mnemonic device which would enable them to recall all the words found on the list. This would not show the true reflection of the experiment to find out the primacy and recency effect. One extraneous variable in this experiment could be the length or the number of syllables in each

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    Each participant is given writing equipment, and a score sheet to write down their recall result. Again the participants were reminded that they have the right to withdraw from the investigation at anytime. Once seated and absolute quietness established, the participants were told "the investigation will start as the first

  1. Investigation into acoustic and visual encoding in short-term memory

    Furthermore in a similar study, Conrad demonstrated that participants found it more difficult to recall strings of acoustically similar letters than strings of acoustically dissimilar letters even though they were presented visually. Conrad concluded that such acoustic confusion provided evidence for acoustic coding in STM.

  2. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    definition of the adjectives This was dealt appropriately by having no more than two syllables for each adjectives and the adjectives used in this experiment was commonly understood by the Year 11-13. . Implications and suggestions for further research The findings of this experiment are significantly useful and can by applied towards many aspects of learning and education.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work