• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Sociology of Behaviour in Golf Clubs

Extracts from this document...


The Sociology of Behaviour in Golf Clubs Research topic My research topic is on the experiences of people in golf clubs. I looked at people's behaviour on the golf course and in the club bar. I studied their conversation topics and patterns and their attitudes towards playing 'well' or 'badly'. I also looked at their perceptions and views about other players. I also explored the themes such as gender, class and racism that were raised in my literature review. I saw if these correlated with my own research and whether new themes arose. I felt qualitative research was the most suitable methodology for my research. Research Questions Qualitative research involves formulating questions to be explored and developed in the research process, rather than hypotheses to be tested by or against empirical research (Mason, 1996:15). Research questions are questions, which the research is designed to address and should express the essence of the enquiry. In my study the questions I set out to address were: * What are peoples experiences of golf clubs? * Who are members of golf clubs? * Are their experiences effected by gender? By class? * What way do they behave on golf courses? * What way do they behave in club bars? * What do they talk about? Are their conversation topics and patterns different on the golf course to the club bar? * What kinds of ideas, norms and beliefs operate in golf clubs? ...read more.


I recognise that my presence, in the role of observer-as-participant, may have changed the participant's behaviour. To minimise this and in order to get more realistic fieldnotes it was important to be as unobtrusive as possible and I avoided reacting to their conversation and behaviour. Participant observation involves the taking of fieldnotes. Fieldnotes can be described as "relatively concrete descriptions of social processes and these contexts" (Hammersley and Atkinson, 1983:145). Fieldnotes are ideally written during the observation as it is easier do record each happening as it occurs rather than trying to recall it all afterwards. It is important to record every mundane detail as it happens and not just events that are deemed significant by the researcher. This is the only way a true picture of the topic can be formed. Every "apparently trivial happenings or utterances" (Lofland and Lofland, 1995:66) must be logged. My fieldnotes were written on the left-hand side of the page and my interpretations were written on the right-hand side. In taking my fieldnotes, using Spadley's (1980) checklist, I took note of the space around me, drawing diagrams when necessary; the participants in sight and what they were doing; objects and props around and in use by the participants; any events or breaks from the norms that occurred; and finally any feelings I sensed or could recognise from facial expressions. I took six, half hour observations in the golf club. ...read more.


My observations were in the form of notes and my interview was transcribed. This enabled me to arrange, rearrange, sort, code and file them with greater ease. The notes were constantly reviewed and codes and categories are identified which by explaining and understanding develop into concepts and theories. Analysis is an ongoing process that took place throughout my study. Earlier analyses influenced later data collection. My analysis followed the guide of Marshall and Rossman's five models of analytic procedures. These involve "organising the data; generating categories, themes and patterns; testing the emergent hypotheses against the data; searching for alternative explanations of the data; and writing the report" (Marshall and Rossman, 1995:113). My analysis also shows whether the issues that were raised in my literature, were relevant or present at all in my study. Through my literature review I was guided by "initial concepts and guiding hypotheses" (Marshall and Rossman, 1995:112) and through my analysis I decided what to discard and what was significant and reoccurring. Biases My bias and preconceptions about golf clubs were that there is a great difference between the experience of males and female players. I thought that men were more competitive and that I would observe them reacting more strongly to playing 'badly' than women. I also thought that women play golf for more social reasons and that they would talk more about non-golf related topics than men. I thought that women were deemed inferior players and that men were seen as more knowledgeable about the sport regardless of handicap. Having recognised these biases beforehand I hope I succeeded in avoiding them in conducting my fieldwork. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    Increased population density has also been shown to lead to increases in aggressive behaviour. Milgrams information overload theory only provides one explanation for urban-rural differences, there has been evidence that shows there are others. Such as, urban societies are more competitive and industrialised.

  2. Enter Achilles (DV8) Review - Laura Mathis

    In a group of monophonic actions, the men huddle in a tight cluster, swaggering in sync and puffing away at their cigarettes in a very sensual and stylized movement. As two of the eight dancers tumble over pool tables, chairs and tables they lift and hold the other displaying an

  1. Social influence, its concepts and ethics

    Two people were used each time, one was fully aware of what was going on, but the second person was naive. The two 'subjects' then had to draw straws as to who would be the teacher and who would be the learner; this was rigged so that the naive person was the teacher and the other person the learner.

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    The case study was conducted using interviews, indirect observation, self reporting and second person communication. Freud interviewed Little Hans' father. He asked him about his son's experiences, as it related to his phobia. He questioned to determine the possible causes of this phobia.

  1. Research Methodology - Quantitative and Qualitative methods.

    * Relaxed * More likely to get respondent to open up and talk about personal issues * Small Group Interview (Focus Group) * Group opinions * 3~5 people * Email and Telephone Interviews * Modern * Less accurate (not face to face)

  2. Is sociology a science?

    It is argued though that this problem is unavoidable and is encountered by natural scientists too but is countered by the argument that in the case of sociology the researcher is actually part of the phenomena thus exacerbating the problem.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work