• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This assignment focuses upon conformity and what it means to us

Extracts from this document...


Michelle Jones, November 2002. Conformity. This assignment focuses upon conformity and what it means to us. Conformity is defined by Zimbardo (1992) as "A tendency for people to adopt behaviour, values and attitudes of other members of a reference group". Why people conform is a topic of much debate. People don't always conform for the same reason's, in 1958 Kelman identified three main forms of conformity, each of which could produce conforming behaviour but in different ways. The first of these and the most superficial is Compliance: Going along with the majority in order to avoid rejection or in order to gain rewards such as social acceptance or approval. ...read more.


The third form of conformity which Kelman identified was that of Internalisation: This form of conformity comes from the persons own value system, their way of understanding the world and morality in both small and large matters. It is about doing what we believe in. With this type of conformity, someone may accept another person's influence and conform to their demands or expectations, not because that person is anyone special but because they wholeheartedly agree with the principles involved. With this kind of conformity, the conforming behaviour is likely to last very much longer than the actual situation requires because the person has "adopted" it for their own and it has become part of their internal value system. ...read more.


and his "fishing reel" experiment, Sherif (1936) and the "Autokinetic effect" experiment involving the various moving lights, Asch and his "perception study" and Perrin and Spencer (1980) with the updated "perception study". Triplett set up one of the first experimental studies of social influence. In studies by Sherif (1936) he revealed a number of interesting findings about group norms. The first was that having the agreement of a majority was extremely influential in forming the norm. Also people who were unfamiliar with the task conformed quicker than those people who had previous experience of it, suggesting that being uncertain about the correct answer encourages conforming to other peoples views. The various studies of conformity reveal that situational factors have more influence over our behaviour than the majority of us actually realise. We tend to underestimate situational forces on our behaviour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Coursework - Conformity

    4 star(s)

    than the females it wouldn't be a surprise if the females conformed less than the males because they have a wider range of general knowledge, which could cause the females to conform less. How to improve reliability By having a standardised procedure i.e.

  2. psychology assignment

    The study was abandoned after only six days instead of the planned fourteen. Zimbardo believes that the study demonstrated the powerful effect roles could have on people's behaviour. The participants were 'playing the role' that they thought was expected of them in particular the stereotyped view of how prison guards behave.

  1. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    The confederates, who were already seated, were introduced to the participant as other participants. The seating arrangements were chairs arranged in a semicircle around a table and the participant was seated in the only available free seat. The standardised instructions were then read aloud by the experimenter and any questions asked regarding the experiment were answered to the participant's satisfaction.

  2. The relationship between group size and conformity

    They were then tested in a group situation, whereby they heard the estimates of two other participants in this situation the estimates of different participants became more similar developing a group norm. Different groups as well as different individuals produced different estimates even if they were in groups to begin with.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work