• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To investigate the effect of misleading questions on the accuracy of witness statements

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Eye-Witness Testimony Aim: To investigate the effect of misleading questions on the accuracy of witness statements. Introduction: Reconstructive memory, or the idea of a schema, a mental framework into which related information or ideas fit together, was first introduced by Bartlett in 1932. In storing information we may reconstruct it to fit into our own personal memory, so it conforms to our existing beliefs, values and expectations. What we remember is influenced by what we know. Confabulation is the process, when we unconsciously adapt our memories to fit in with our existing experiences. Our experiment was based on the work conducted by Loftus and Zanni on eye-witness testimony. For example, they did an experiment where participants were shown a film of mulpitle car accidents, and then were asked questions, concerning the accidents. There were 2 groups and they were asked 22 item questions and 6 critical questions. Group A was asked indefinite article questions, for example "Did you see a broken headlight?" and group B "Did you see the broken headlight?". Indefinite article did not imply as to whether article was present or not and definite article did imply that it was present. ...read more.

Middle

Experimental Hypothesis: Asking misleading questions increases the chance of participants reporting seeint items / actions which did not occur (Q2-4) or causes participants to report an increase in the number of people (Q1) or the speed of the car (Q5) as suggested in the misleading question. Null Hypothesis: There is no difference between answers to straightforward questions and answers to misleading questions. Method Design: The independent variable is the straightforward or the misleading question. The dependent variable is the answer given. The study was an experiment with an independent groups design (different participants in each condition). The main variable that has not been controlled are the individual differences between people as previous experience and memories could also affect the answers given. Repeated measures to get more reliable results would have been inappropriate because people would be very likely to remember their previous answers, could see the difference between questions and guess what the study is about, due to the demand characteristics of people. That would influence the answers given and so would be unreliable. The ethical issue raised is that fully inform consent was not given to the students before the test, but given after. ...read more.

Conclusion

try and guess what the experiment was about, due to demand characteristics, and if they succeeded at guessing that could change their answers. It is not like they are giving evidence against someone, which could have great consequences, but they were in a classroom and whatever the students would answer, it would not have any impact on anything important. There is also an issue that there is no emotional factor involved - seeing a video of a car crash is not remotely similar to seeing it in real life. Emotions can create flashbulb memories, which means the witness could recall the event with very fine details. This issue was also not considered in the two experiments by Loftus discussed earlier. To improve the experiment, more participants should be tested. Due to the limited amount of students in a classroom, it was harder to do. However, the results would have been much more reliable if more people were tested. To improve the ecological validity of the experiment, the emotional effect should be considered. For example, the experiment could be done on an important public tragedy, such as the Twin Towers, which would involve the emotional effect. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Memory: Rote Rhearsal and Mental Imagery.

    After two minutes of learning the word pairs, the participants were instructed to turn over the word pairs and perform a distracter task. The distracter task was just making the participants think about something else and was stopping them from looking at the word pairs.

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    A controlled experiment was very crucial as it was an experiment on a memory recall which means that a noisy environment such as in this case the college canteen would not be a suitable place to test on a memory test because the environment is noisy.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Loftus (1979) used the 'weapon focus' study to investigate the ability of an individual recall information after an emotionally arousing situation. Participants waited outside a laboratory to take part in an investigation, but as they were waiting a staged man exited the room carrying either a pen or a blood-covered paper knife.

  2. Stroop Effect

    One variation of Stroops study was conducted by Flowers (1979). He found that people struggle to resist saying the numbers that make up each row rather that counting the numbers, this is because number recognition is much more automated relative to number counting.

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    participants had to recognise the slides included in the original set. One slide showing the car stopped at the yield sign; another slide showing the car stopped at the stop sign. 75 percent of the participants who had received the consistent questions picked the correct slide, as opposed to 41 percent who had been given the misleading question.

  2. The Stroop Effect

    Hypothesis-null: There will be no difference in the time taken for participants to say colour words in a different colour to what the word is on a word list then when the colour word is in the same colour. Methods Design The research will be carried out in a repeated

  1. Psychology Report

    The aim of the study I am conducting, is to investigate the effect of a distractor task from the recall of a list of words on the STM, of a selection of students Experimental hypothesis There will be a higher percentage of accurately recalled words at the end of the

  2. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    The purpose of this is to detect signature aspects of the crime and similar patterns of ?motus operandi' (way of working) this will enable detectives to identify crimes that may have been committed by the same offender. If the profile of the offender is classified as organised then it raises

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work