• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To see whether giving people a displacement activity before recalling the words would affect the number of the last five words in a list of words that are remembered.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Psychology Coursework Introduction Aim: To see whether giving people a displacement activity before recalling the words would affect the number of the last five words in a list of words that are remembered. Hypothesis Alternative (Ha): People who recall words in a list with the displacement activity are less likely to recall the last five words in the list than those people who didn't have the displacement activity. Null (Ho): Any difference in the number of the last five words remembered by people who experienced the displacement activity and those who didn't, will be due to chance factors. Rationale: I am doing this experiment to find out whether having a displacement activity would affect the number of words remembered from the list. I chose this experiment as I am interested in finding out more about memory. I am going to the Glanzer and Cunitz displacement activity but changing the activity involved in the experiment instead of asking participants to count back from 100 in 3's like Glanzer and Cunitz I will ask them to recall their three times table up to sixty. Background Research: In 1966 two psychologists Glanzer and Cunitz experimented a displacement activity, this is where they asked participants to listen to a list of words then asked some of them to recall the words straight away and others to count back from 100 in 3s then to recall the words. They compared the words remembered and what position they were in the list. ...read more.

Middle

Thinking about doing you three times table will knock the last five words. My displacement activity was to do the three times table up to the number sixty. First I read the list of words again as previously then asked them to do the displacement activity. Then after the participant had done that they were then asked to recall the as many of words they can remember from the list previously read. I then ticked all the words the participants recalled. After carrying out both the experiments I then gathered all the participants together and I debriefed them to explain what they have been doing in their experiments and answer any questions if they have any. Controls: My controls were that I made sure that I picked the same amount of girls as I did boys and I only used one year so as not to let age affect the results. I also made sure that all participants received the same briefing before taking part in the experiment and debriefing after having done it. I tried to control their environment as much as I possibly could. In the experiment I used the same words, the same place and I carried out the experiment on the same day in order to make the environment for each person as similar as possible. If it was carried out on two different occasions other factors could have interfered with the participants recall e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is because different people will be used with different memory skills. The experiment wasn't very reliable because people walked pass the room that we were in this could have effected the concentration on the participant and that could cause them not to remember as many of the words. To improve this we could use a wider variety of people and do the experiment in a quiet place where no one goes to cause a distraction. Implications: The results I have collected show that doing a displacement activity does affect the memory. In the experiment considerable more people remembered the last 5 words when they didn't have a displacement activity. This does show that if there isn't a displacement activity there participants are more likely to recall the last five words. Overall my experiment supports previous research and their conclusions drawn from the experiments. Generalisability: I think we could generalise the results to the whole population if we used a bigger sample that related to the whole population as our sample is only a small proportion of the whole population. Real life application: This would be that some times eye-witness testimonies might be incorrect as not because they are trying to frame somebody but because they generally can't remember. However if there is along time between the crime and the police statement made by the eye witness, the memories might be lost from decay. Another example for real life application might just simple be people doing two things at once the second will displace the first task as it's more recent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    In contrast participants could be asked to watch television or play a game. The game here would involve mental ability to avoid the rehearsal of the information. To improve the study even further different durations of the distraction could be tested to see which is the most likely to cause

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    they know what the experiment is about therefore will either perform in a way that they researcher might want them to do, this would mean that the results would not show a true reflection of the primacy and recency effect.

  1. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    The participants used were all 'A' level students and were asked at random if they willing to take part. Some of these students studied psychology at 'A' level themselves and so may have known what the investigation was about, thus possibly affecting the final results.

  2. Describe the application of behaviorist perspectives in health and social care. Describe the application ...

    In hand this will produce rebelling against things as they have a negative concept of themselves so will show negative behaviors. Explain the value of the cognitive perspective in supporting individuals. (P5) The cognitive psychological approach was formed in the 1960s.

  1. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    This theory suggests that information at the beginning of a list, can be recalled effectively due to the fact that it has been rehearsed and therefore passed into the long-term memory store (LTM). It is then recalled from the LTM when needed.

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    The difference between recall in laboratories and in an actual witness-situation was shown by the comparison of results collected by Peters (1988) in laboratory research, and results collect by Yuille and Cutshall (1986) in a study following an armed robbery.

  1. Will participants have a better recall of words when they are presented in an ...

    The process of studying the cards and recalling as many words as they could was repeated four times. The group whose cards had been presented in a logical manner recalled all 112 words in the final two recalls; the other group averaged just 70 words on the final recall.

  2. the affect interference has on the recall of words

    Jenkins and Dallenbach (1924) provided evidence to show information was lost due to interference as oppose to decay. In their study they had two participants who had to learn a list of syllables, one participant learnt theirs in the morning and the other at night right before going to sleep.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work