• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To see whether giving people a displacement activity before recalling the words would affect the number of the last five words in a list of words that are remembered.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Psychology Coursework Introduction Aim: To see whether giving people a displacement activity before recalling the words would affect the number of the last five words in a list of words that are remembered. Hypothesis Alternative (Ha): People who recall words in a list with the displacement activity are less likely to recall the last five words in the list than those people who didn't have the displacement activity. Null (Ho): Any difference in the number of the last five words remembered by people who experienced the displacement activity and those who didn't, will be due to chance factors. Rationale: I am doing this experiment to find out whether having a displacement activity would affect the number of words remembered from the list. I chose this experiment as I am interested in finding out more about memory. I am going to the Glanzer and Cunitz displacement activity but changing the activity involved in the experiment instead of asking participants to count back from 100 in 3's like Glanzer and Cunitz I will ask them to recall their three times table up to sixty. Background Research: In 1966 two psychologists Glanzer and Cunitz experimented a displacement activity, this is where they asked participants to listen to a list of words then asked some of them to recall the words straight away and others to count back from 100 in 3s then to recall the words. They compared the words remembered and what position they were in the list. ...read more.

Middle

Thinking about doing you three times table will knock the last five words. My displacement activity was to do the three times table up to the number sixty. First I read the list of words again as previously then asked them to do the displacement activity. Then after the participant had done that they were then asked to recall the as many of words they can remember from the list previously read. I then ticked all the words the participants recalled. After carrying out both the experiments I then gathered all the participants together and I debriefed them to explain what they have been doing in their experiments and answer any questions if they have any. Controls: My controls were that I made sure that I picked the same amount of girls as I did boys and I only used one year so as not to let age affect the results. I also made sure that all participants received the same briefing before taking part in the experiment and debriefing after having done it. I tried to control their environment as much as I possibly could. In the experiment I used the same words, the same place and I carried out the experiment on the same day in order to make the environment for each person as similar as possible. If it was carried out on two different occasions other factors could have interfered with the participants recall e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is because different people will be used with different memory skills. The experiment wasn't very reliable because people walked pass the room that we were in this could have effected the concentration on the participant and that could cause them not to remember as many of the words. To improve this we could use a wider variety of people and do the experiment in a quiet place where no one goes to cause a distraction. Implications: The results I have collected show that doing a displacement activity does affect the memory. In the experiment considerable more people remembered the last 5 words when they didn't have a displacement activity. This does show that if there isn't a displacement activity there participants are more likely to recall the last five words. Overall my experiment supports previous research and their conclusions drawn from the experiments. Generalisability: I think we could generalise the results to the whole population if we used a bigger sample that related to the whole population as our sample is only a small proportion of the whole population. Real life application: This would be that some times eye-witness testimonies might be incorrect as not because they are trying to frame somebody but because they generally can't remember. However if there is along time between the crime and the police statement made by the eye witness, the memories might be lost from decay. Another example for real life application might just simple be people doing two things at once the second will displace the first task as it's more recent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    In contrast participants could be asked to watch television or play a game. The game here would involve mental ability to avoid the rehearsal of the information. To improve the study even further different durations of the distraction could be tested to see which is the most likely to cause

  2. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    This, one tailed hypothesis was formulated as previous research has indicated the existence of a primacy effect, and the elimination of the recency effect when using an interference task. However when undertaking the same task without interference there should be both a primacy and recency effect.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    This was crucial because if time amount given was not controlled the results produced would not be reliable because if participants had more time to look at the words they would try to memorise all the words or try to make a short story out of the words, make a

  2. Describe the application of behaviorist perspectives in health and social care. Describe the application ...

    Also the intellectual development may not be sufficient as thinking for themselves may become difficult due to always being told what to do and having a low self esteem.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    Use the stopwatch and give them 5 minutes. j) After 5 minutes, say, "Your 5 minutes are up." Take the Word List 2/Word List 3 away from the participants in condition 2 and 3. 4. Prepare a sheet of paper and a writing utensil.

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    items, whilst those in the separate room only scored an average of twelve items. Some participants from the group placed in a different room had been asked to imagine the basement room before completing the test. The average result from this group was seventeen.17 These results show that the place in which each person was tested affected their results.

  1. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    Thus, information in the middle of the list is forgotten, as it has not been rehearsed and new information coming into the STM displaces it. Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) investigated the idea of there being two mechanisms in free recall.

  2. An experiment to investigate whether chunking leads to better recall.

    In the related list participants should recall late words best, early words should be recalled next best and middle words should be recalled least well. However when using the related words list where chunking should hopefully take place, more words should be recalled from the middle of the list than in the unrelated list.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work