• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what are conformity and obedience likely outcomes of human behaviour and can individuals avoid these social influences?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐To what are conformity and obedience likely outcomes of human behaviour and can individuals avoid these social influences? Both conformity and obedience can be seen in everyday life, from young children to grown adults. They both are to a great extent likely outcomes of human behaviour, this can be seen in everyday life for example following the recent fashion to obeying people of an authority figure. Asch?s line experiment conducted in 1951 showed to a great extent how people conform, with the minority behaving like the majority with thinking about the point of view. Even when the participants knew they were right, they still gave the wrong answer they felt they had to comply with the rest of the group, as they did not want to seen as an outcast and wanted to fit in with the rest of the group. ...read more.


and others had put too much emphasis on the notion that the majority in a group has a large influence on the minority.?( http://www.simplypsychology.org/minority-influence.html) the study showed that having more than one person sticking together and giving constantly the same answer influenced the majority of the group by agreeing with the colour chosen by the minority. The reason the majority conformed to the small minority is because they felt that the minority knew more and saw them as knowing more information. Informational social influence can not only be seen by having a persuasive minority but also where the situation is ambiguous this is where not being clear on what the right thing to do is. The situation being crisis, where a quick action is needed so if someone is in a situation where they need to give an answer quickly they will become under pressure and just follow someone else. ...read more.


Finally Latane also explained that and individual is more likely to listen to a specific speaker within a smaller group rather than one of a larger group. The social impact theory does not only have an effect on conformity but also on the way in which people obey. The social impact principle can be used for obedience as the if a individual finds some deemed more important for example a police officer they are more likely to obey as they see that the officer is an authority figure and knows what is best. Milgram?s study showed the extent in which people obey as each participant is believed to be giving electric shocks to another even when knowing that the shocks that are been given are fatal they proceed as there is a an authority figure in the room who is telling them to carry on, which to the participants see as re assuring as they see the authority figure to know what is best. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    Findings show that, "two-thirds of this studies participants fall into the category of 'obedient' subjects, and that they represent ordinary people drawn from the working, managerial, and professional classes (Obedience to Authority)." Ultimately 65% of all of the "teachers" punished the "learners" to the maximum 450 volts.

  2. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    These may include disapproval (e.g. negative reactions from others), damaged self-esteem (feeling that one is not a good person) and negative emotional response (e.g. not helping may cause feelings of guilt). Evidence that supports the Arousal/Cost-Reward Model Piliavan et al's (1969) Subway Samaritan study provides support for his proposed arousal/cost-reward model.

  1. Conformity & Obedience to Authority.

    It was then explained that one of the subjects was to be the teacher and the other to be the learner. The assistant was always assigned the role of the learner and the participant the teacher. The teacher was then shown to a nearby room where the learner was strapped

  2. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    An important point is that these people cannot be too divergent from us. If they are, our comparisons with them will be meaningless. Festinger's theory also maintains that people will attempt to change their abilities and opinions if they are not satisfied with their self-evaluation.

  1. The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience

    Solomon Asch thought he could improve on Sherif's work and really demonstrate true conformity. Asch's visual judgement experiment (1951) showed just how easy it is to influence someone into saying something blatantly wrong! In Asch's experiments participants were asked to match a standard line to one of three alternatives, a task all people with normal vision could do quite accurately.

  2. Why do we obey authority?

    A further study was carried out by the psychologist Zimbardo (1973) whereby twenty-five participants undertook extensive psychological tests to exclude any people of unstable nature. They were offered a generous fee. A simulated prison was created in the basement of Stanford University and the eventual participants flipped a coin to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work