• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the following explain the concept that is abnormal behaviour?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do the following explain the concept that is abnormal behaviour? -Statistical infrequency's -Deviation from social norms -Failure to function adequately -Deviation from ideal mental health It has long been suggested that psychologists have a major problem in defining the term abnormality, as no one person or model has yet found an absolute universal truth to illustrate abnormal behaviour. Therefore psychologists have come up with different assumptions and concepts to try to clarify abnormality. This has resulted in the production of a large divergence of models, none of which seem to fully depict abnormality. However, whilst looking through these models, we must decide if they are actually trying to portray abnormality, or if they are simply a basis for each individual to use accordingly. Also we must keep in mind the problems with defining abnormality, because there is no base or guidelines to use. For example, in order to explain what abnormal behaviour is, do we not need to first know what normal behaviour is? This is a problem in itself because there is no way to establish what normal is, as it varies from person to person, their culture, environment, and social status. Now let us observe each model in turn and conclude if they adequately establish what abnormal behaviour is. First is statistical infrequency's. This uses the method that frequent occurrence is normal, and infrequent occurrence is abnormal. ...read more.


Therefore, this view implies that if a person does not conform to the social norms then they are abnormal, but how can this be if they are conforming to their own personal norms, and are most definitely in excellent mental health. Also, we must realise that a certain amount of divergence from social norms is needed in order for society to grow, and function. This view does explain, to a small extent, what abnormal behaviour is, but, yet again, it is limited in how useful because it is not universal. Failure to function adequately is a model that views behaviour as abnormal if it hinders an individuals or groups well being. E.G if a person were so mentally ill that they harmed the people around them, and prevented them from 'normal' behaviour, they would considered be abnormal. Rosenhan & Seligman (1989) suggested that if a combination of the following criteria were encountered then it may suggest a psychological disorder. The criteria are: 1) Personal distress 2) Maladaptiveness 3) Irrationality 4) Unpredictability 5) Unconventionality 6) Observer discomfort 7) Violation of moral and ideal standards There is a problem with these criteria though, because they rely on a subjective judgement of other people. For example, whose moral standards must we use in order to decide if a person has violated them? The same could be said for observer discomfort, because each person is not going to be affected to the same amount by the same stimuli. ...read more.


For example, in some cultures it is still normal to eat the remains of a recently deceased relative, but to us, this would be considered extremely abnormal, and called cannibalism Benedict observed that normality was a culturally defined concept, meaning that the definition of normal and abnormal would differ between each culture according to their social norms. Research also shows that some mental disorders are specific only to certain cultures suggesting that it is the result of that societies norms and values. I.E eating disorders affect mainly women and men in the western world, perhaps because it is seen to be unacceptable to be over a certain weight, and people in the western world are more obsessed with their physical appearance, but only because societies norms have dictated that fat is bad. However, there are some disorders that are universal, such as people who cannot assume a basic social role, and are considered abnormal in any society. Also, certain mental conditions such as schizophrenia and psychopathic behaviour occurs in all cultures. Conclusion So, do any of these models actually define what abnormal behaviour is? And is it actually possible to fully explain such a diverse term in one small model? I think that although these models are very limited in their approach they do give some base to diagnose a psychological condition. The Falling of all of these models is their lack of universality and that they depend on the subjective judgements of another person, which can very rarely be achieved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare 2 models of abnormal behaviour in terms of their views on the causes ...

    3 star(s)

    While the "Biological" model's view is that the individuals behaviour is determined by factors outside his or her control, the "Cognitive" model believes that the individual is in control.

  2. Abnormality Revision Guide

    be defined in the context of how a particular culture would view that behaviour. Statistical Frequency shows us a quantifiable way of identifying abnormality so that we can compare and contrast numbers of people who display varying levels of the abnormality.

  1. Consider the Problems Faced by Psychologists in the Definition of Abnormality

    Similarly although occurrence of depression in Western cultures is high, in Asian cultures it is unexpectedly low. Rack (1982) saw that actually the frequency rates of depression are roughly equal; however Asians believe that doctors are only to be approached regarding physical illness, not mental illness.

  2. Outline and Evaluate the Biological, Psychodynamic and Cognitive Explanations of Abnormality

    The cognitive triad featured 'negative views about the future', 'negative views about the world' and 'negative views about oneself'. Treatment associated with the cognitive model involves both talking with a therapist and evaluating one's own thought patterns. A client will work with a therapist in order to discover the beliefs and expectations that cause their unhappiness.

  1. Describe and evaluate the concepts of abnormal behaviour When we talk about abnormal behaviour ...

    The main reason for this being, it is a very easy, cheap and quick way to see if someone is mentally abnormal. All you need is a couple of graphs. Of course this also raises the problem of whether the data being used is fair representation of the population, dose it take cultural differences into account e.g.

  2. Define different theoretical perspectives used in counselling. Analyse the advantages and ...

    Maslow's skills and techniques, like his hierarchy of needs, are used in counselling for the person-centred approach. A counsellor would offer unconditional positive regard and acceptance while their client would go through a process of integration. If it is successful the person will have high positive regard Pavlov's theory of classical conditioning is put into a counselling therapy.


    Positive reinforcers are favourable events or outcomes that are given to the individual after the desired behaviour has been displayed such as praise or rewards when a task is done, negative reinforcers are where the removal of a undesired or unpleasant outcome after the desired behaviour has been shown like

  2. The contents of this essay will explain different psychological approaches to health and social ...

    feelings and behaviours are caused by an individual's thoughts, not an exterior stimuli for instance, individuals, situations and events. Individuals may not be able to alter their circumstances, but they can alter how they think about them and consequently alter how they feel and behave, according to cognitive-behaviour therapists.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work