• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has psychological research shown eyewitness testimony to be unreliable?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent has psychological research shown eyewitness testimony to be unreliable? Eyewitness testimony is the evidence that is provided by individuals whom have witnessed an event, crime or happening. EWT relies solely on recall from memory and normally includes accounts of events and descriptions of persons involved. Although EWT is used largely by the police on identifying suspects of a crime, giving great cause for concern over policing methods in our society. It has been proven by psychologists not to be entirely reliable. It has also been shown that it is not the witness themselves that are unreliable but more so the methods used by professionals to obtain testimonial statements. The main issue concerned with the unreliability of EWT lies in the effect of language. A school of thought is provoked by the studies of Elizabeth Loftus. She has carried out various experiments concerned with leading questions and language. ...read more.


Their study showed that eyewitness memory is very fragile and can easily be distorted by events that happen after the incident (post-event information), and the change of only one word in a question can have a huge effect on the participants memory. This has great implications for the questioning in police interviews as it can lead to confabulated evidence Although this study suggests that EWT is unreliable the criticisms it received do not necessarily suggest this. The fact that this was an artificial experiment in which a video was used suggests it is not as emotionally arousing as witnessing an event first hand. This potentially effects recall which is proven in later study by Yuille and Cutshall (1986) in which participants who thought they had witness a real robbery gave a more accurate description of the robbers. A further area to consider is the issue of reconstructive memory. ...read more.


Bartlett found that the recalled stories were far shorter than the original. In some parts the story had been changed to match that of the participant's cultural perspectives. The recalled versions eventually became fixed in the participant's minds. This study gives more evidence that EWT is unreliable as the essential meaning of a story/event is remembered, but any gaps are filled in with information to make the story easier to remember, the story is effectively skewed to fit the individual's schema. Although the results show that the story/event was remembered it also shows that small gaps were not remembered. It is these small gaps that could complete the jigsaw to a crime proving EWT is unreliable. It was argued that if participants were told from the start that they had to remember the story accurately from the beginning then total recall would occur, this was proved in a further study. However, in everyday situations we witness many events and we do not pay full attention therefore it is not a valid point to suggest this argument. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent does research support the view that eyewitness testimony is unreliable?

    3 star(s)

    People tend to 'remember' what is consistent with their schemas and filter out what is inconsistent. The results of research into the effect of anxiety on eyewitness testimony have been highly mixed. It is believed that eye witness testimony is most accurate when the anxiety level is somewhere in between low and high.

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Gauld and Stephenson (1967) criticised Bartlett's study as they found that if the participants were told that accurate recall was important then the numbers of errors made were significantly reduced. However, in the case of eyewitness testimony the effect may not be the same.

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    "boats" replaced "canoe". The distortions increased with time and most of the errors made the story read more like an English story and to make it more coherent. There was evidence of flattening (failure to recall unfamiliar details e.g. the ghosts)

  2. Outline and evaluate research related to eyewitness testimony

    The study has low mundane realism as individuals were not asked to recall a story from a different culture in everyday life. Moving on, stereotypes are cultural expectations; which are contained within schemas. A witness to a crime may describe what the suspect was wearing based on their criminal schema, rather than the actual clothes that the criminal was wearing.

  1. The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

    An Independent groups design was used for this experiment. This means that different participants were used in both conditions. This method was chosen to avoid order effects, which could be a result of using the same participants twice, this could have affected the result data collected. This also reduces the chances of demand characteristics arising, as participants will be

  2. To what extent had psychological research shown Eye Witness Testimony to be reliable and ...

    Another study that may help to support this idea is Bartlett's schema theory. Participants were told a story called "The War of the Ghosts" and were then asked to recall it after different intervals of time. Bartlett found that participants subconsciously changed the story to make it familiar to their

  1. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    3rd ed. United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes Ltd Mcleod S A (2009). Eyewitness testimony. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.simplypsychology.org. [Last Accessed 26 October 2012]. Saker D, Class Handouts on Memory in Psychology, (2012) Compare the American and British approaches to offender profiling.

  2. Eye witness testimony is so unreliable that it should never be used in convicting ...

    (Lawton, Page 26, 2011) Research continuously shows that eye witness testimony is affected in a number of ways. A key factor is the use of misleading information, predominantly in the form of misleading questions. In the courtroom, barristers are frequently accused of 'leading the witness'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work