• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has research shown eyewitness testimony to be inaccurate?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent has research shown eyewitness testimony to be inaccurate? Eyewitness testimony is the evidence provided in court by a person who witnessed a crime, with a view to identifying the perpetrator. The accuracy of eyewitness recall may be affected during initial encoding, subsequent storage and eventual retrieval. There are three stages of 'eyewitness memory'; encoding, retention and retrieval. Throughout these stages the memory is distorted, lost, modified, interfered with and reconstructed. Elizabeth Loftus has conducted many studies concerning eye witness testimony - one in which she worked with Palmer (1974) to see if leading questions distort the eyewitness's immediate recall. ...read more.

Middle

These findings tell us that a leading question can greatly affect the witness's answer. It also shows that eyewitnesses are easily influenced by just one word. Other factors influencing eyewitness memory include the extreme level of stress in the situation, the presence of a weapon, the length of time that the person sees the perpetrator, whether it was dark, the way witnesses might talk to one another after the event, possible influence by media reports and the race of the witness and perpetrator. Many studies have now found that there is an average of about 15 percent difference between the accuracy rates of identifying people of your own race compared with identifying people of a different race. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even with all the potential margins for error, eyewitness testimony can still make or break a case. Studies show that eyewitness testimony is the most unreliable evidence you could possibly have, but in court it is probably the strongest evidence you could possibly present. Although most of the research provided on eyewitness testimony comes to the conclusion of it being unreliable and fallible, there is other research by psychologists such as Geiselman et al (1985), who have found ways eg cognitive interview, to give accurate memory recall and greatly improve the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. From the evidence presented I can come to the conclusion that even though eyewitness testimony is initially unreliable, using new interview techniques, based on proven psychological principles, can produce detailed and accurate information from the eye witness's memory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent does research support the view that eyewitness testimony is unreliable?

    3 star(s)

    When considering the reliability of eyewitness testimony, it is important to bear in mind the type of crime that is being recalled. Some crimes, such as those involving violence, are associated with high levels of anxiety in victims or bystanders.

  2. A counselling Interview

    notion realistically, and the understanding that he performs better when being proactive rather than passive. As Lee prioritised, I attempted to portray his wants as potential valued outcomes rather than just activities and also to make them attainable, specific, realistic and flexible.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    He used a story that he considered to be meaningless to people living in England, although this assumption may be correct there was no way of measuring how meaningless it was to each individual. Due to this people may have been able to relate, or not to relate to the

  2. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    This supports Bartlett's view that people's recall is influenced by their expectations and would consequently suggests that EWT is unreliable. Research has also shown that language, such as used in questioning a potential eyewitness, can distort a witness's memory of an event.

  1. Outline and evaluate the research into eyewitness testimony.

    This leaves question of bias, as well as the fact the office was stages, almost lab - like, so therefore the variables were manipulated. The third research topic into EWT is the age of the witness. People tend to think that a children's testimony is less reliable and that their testimony should be treated as suspect.

  2. Memory and Eyewitness Testimony

    Lashley (1931) found a correlation between how much material was removed from a rats brain and the amount they forgot. The more material removed the less the rat would forget. This shows strong support for the decay theory. However, this research can be said to be lacking in validity because

  1. The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

    On signing the form the participant gave their consent for participation in the experiment. After the experiment had taken place the participants were debriefed. This ensured that the participant was comfortable with the answers and behaviours that they had given and displayed during the course of the experiment.

  2. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    are other more subjective methods to study human behaviour like memory, such as participant observation in a group and unstructured interviewing where more valid responses may be given in a more informal situation. What was equally important too was the fact there will always be individual differences, where not everyone?s

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work