• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has research shown eyewitness testimony to be inaccurate?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent has research shown eyewitness testimony to be inaccurate? Eyewitness testimony is the evidence provided in court by a person who witnessed a crime, with a view to identifying the perpetrator. The accuracy of eyewitness recall may be affected during initial encoding, subsequent storage and eventual retrieval. There are three stages of 'eyewitness memory'; encoding, retention and retrieval. Throughout these stages the memory is distorted, lost, modified, interfered with and reconstructed. Elizabeth Loftus has conducted many studies concerning eye witness testimony - one in which she worked with Palmer (1974) to see if leading questions distort the eyewitness's immediate recall. ...read more.


These findings tell us that a leading question can greatly affect the witness's answer. It also shows that eyewitnesses are easily influenced by just one word. Other factors influencing eyewitness memory include the extreme level of stress in the situation, the presence of a weapon, the length of time that the person sees the perpetrator, whether it was dark, the way witnesses might talk to one another after the event, possible influence by media reports and the race of the witness and perpetrator. Many studies have now found that there is an average of about 15 percent difference between the accuracy rates of identifying people of your own race compared with identifying people of a different race. ...read more.


Even with all the potential margins for error, eyewitness testimony can still make or break a case. Studies show that eyewitness testimony is the most unreliable evidence you could possibly have, but in court it is probably the strongest evidence you could possibly present. Although most of the research provided on eyewitness testimony comes to the conclusion of it being unreliable and fallible, there is other research by psychologists such as Geiselman et al (1985), who have found ways eg cognitive interview, to give accurate memory recall and greatly improve the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. From the evidence presented I can come to the conclusion that even though eyewitness testimony is initially unreliable, using new interview techniques, based on proven psychological principles, can produce detailed and accurate information from the eye witness's memory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    story, across a spectrum; this may have altered the results without explanation- people who understood a certain part of the story better than others were more likely to remember it. Further investigation was done into schemas in 1981 by Brewer and Treyens whose aim it was to find the effects of schemas on visual memory.

  2. The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

    He also believed that we could interpret different situations and change our memories, not on purpose, but to attempt to better understand or cope with them. He asked participants to read a short story and re-tell it as accurately as they could a number of times.

  1. A counselling Interview

    ''...prioritising without adequate exploration is likely to be ineffective. Exploration is likely to be inhibited if clients do not feel accepted and understood.'' (Culley, 1991) I then attempted to uncover blind spots and gain leverage into Lee's situation by asking him open questions e.g. ''How did that make you feel?''

  2. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    It seems that Bartlett's participants actively reconstructed the story to fit their existing schema, thus supporting his schema theory. Consequently all of Bartlett's findings suggest that memory is constantly being reconstructed because each successive recall showed more changes. This implies that an EWT's reporting of events may become less accurate

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    We make sense of information by filling in oddities. We distort memories for events to fit in with prior expectations, and lastly, we may use out schemas to provide the basis for a guess. Schemas, therefore may lead to distortions in memory. Research on schemas by Brewer and Treyens supports Bartlet in his claims.

  2. To what extent has psychological research shown eyewitness testimony to be unreliable?

    Loftus and Palmer concluded that leading questions can affect the accuracy of witnesses' accounts of events.

  1. 'It is clear from psychological research into memory and eye-witness testimony that accounts of ...

    He used a story called 'The war of the ghosts' (North American Indian story) this was told to English participants, it was unusual to them as it was from another culture and so would not fit their schemas. He tested the memory in two ways, by repeated reproduction where the

  2. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    Clifford and Scott (1978) found in a study that people who watched a film of a violent attack recalled less than 40 items about the attack than a control group who watched a less stressful version of the same attack.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work