• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using your knowledge and understanding of Reconstructive Memory Theory explain how a memory is created and stored and why there may be inaccuracies in the recall of the eye-witness, then evaluate this claim

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐There are claims that Eye Witness Testimonies are an unreliable form of evidence to use in court and that they cannot be believed and are leading to false convictions. Using your knowledge and understanding of Reconstructive Memory Theory explain how a memory is created and stored and why there may be inaccuracies in the recall of the eye-witness, then evaluate this claim. [12 marks] Eyewitness testimony is the account that a bystander of a crime gives during a courtroom trial; this includes giving important details of the event, as well as identifying the perpetrators. They are accepted as a strong form of evidence in the judicial system, and oftentimes will lead to convictions. Bartlett suggested that memory was ?an imaginative reconstruction? of past events?influenced by our attitudes and responses to the events at the time they occurred. This means that any attempt to recall a memory involves the process of ?reconstructing? it. ...read more.


This study brings us to the conclusion that people reconstruct a memory to fit their own culture, and what they think is normal. This shows that people?s memories are not a useful tool in eyewitness testimony?as details key to the trial may not be recalled because they do not fit the person?s view of what is normal, and therefore is not a part of the reconstructed memory. A study by Allport & Postman also showed how stereotypes can affect a person?s memory. The study consisted of asking participants to recall a picture they had been shown of a smart-looking black man being attacked by a rough-looking white man with a razor; participants tended to recall the picture as the black man attacking the white one with the razor. This shows that memory is reconstructed by what we perceive to be the normal, stereotypical thing. ...read more.


The two theories differ because Levels of Processing goes further to explain why certain memories may not be as strong as others, based on the level of which a memory is formed; whereas Reconstructive Memory theory suggests that it is to do with a person?s opinion and attitude on what a ?normal? thing to see is, and is manipulated from that opinion. However, both studies offer insight as to why eyewitness testimonies may become unreliable as evidence in a court of law. Reconstructive Memory theory, therefore, suggests that as a result of memories being created and stored through schemas and imaginative reconstruction, memories become unreliable as a piece of evidence because people piece the memory back together according to what they think should be the normal way the memory went. This explains how eyewitness testimony is unreliable because it means that despite what actually happened, an eyewitness may give an account leading to the prosecution of a wrongly accused person because they have reconstructed the memory in an incorrect way as a result of stereotyping and their own beliefs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Measurements of Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimonies

    4 star(s)

    He was unable to get a taxi so he decided to drive home, despite having been drinking. He was travelling at 38 miles per hour, lost control of the car and hit a garden wall. The house owner alerted the police, who then breathalysed John.


    Here 40 participants of each age group would be tested to give us a larger set of data in which different factors have been investigated. The target population will be 15 - 18 from Brinsworth Comprehensive Sixth Form School. It has also been discussed that the counting back in 3's

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    In contrast participants could be asked to watch television or play a game. The game here would involve mental ability to avoid the rehearsal of the information. To improve the study even further different durations of the distraction could be tested to see which is the most likely to cause

  2. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Twenty minutes later the participants were involved in a recollection test. They were required to view fifteen pairs of slides, and to pick from each pair the one they had seen in the original presentation. These fifteen slides included the critical slide, whether the car stopped at a 'Yield' sign or a 'Stop' sign.

  1. 'Organisation in Memory'.

    Mandler concluded that those who used the most categories had imposed the most organisation, thus improving recall. Collins and Quillan (1969) also developed a model based on organisation in memory. This is known as the 'Hierarchical Network Model' (HNM). They thought that information was stored in a hierarchical fashion in memory.

  2. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    In this investigation the independent groups design was used; two groups of participants used to investigate two conditions. This particular design was used to avoid order effects and participants guessing the purpose of the experiment. The investigation used an opportunity sample (people who are easily available)

  1. Recall in Memory Using Mnemonics

    Aims My aim in this research is to further study the effects of mnemonic devices on recall. I will be using the Loci method mentioned above in my investigation on the experimental group and there will be a control group who will not be using any recall aids.

  2. everyday memory

    * Jenkins and Dallenbach (1924)- discovered that memory for words was better after a period of sleeping than after a period of waking. - Presumably the newly learned information was interfered with by cognitive activity during the waking period, and this interference did not occur during sleep.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work