• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the main methods of investigation available to psychologists? Drawing on evidence from studies, what are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods?

Extracts from this document...


What are the main methods of investigation available to psychologists? Drawing on evidence from studies, what are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods? There are three main methods of investigation which psychologists use. This essay will describe these methods: experiments; surveys; and observations; together with a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of each. The first means of investigation is the experimental approach. An experiment is an empirical study where the researcher makes things happen by manipulating a factor, referred as the independent variable, and records the effect on another variable, known as the dependent variable. The experimenter deliberately intervenes in order to see what impact their intervention has on the outcome. In psychology, the main form of experiment tends to be controlled experiments, where there is a control group, which acts as a baseline in comparison with the experimental group. An important feature of a controlled experiment is the random allocation of participants to the two groups, so that there is no systematic bias in forming the groups. This is called randomisation. A key advantage of the experimental method is that it is the only technique by which cause and effect can be determined. In other words it can show whether one variable is causing a specific impact on another variable. Another advantage is the fact that the findings tend to be quite easy to interpret is of benefit to the experimenter. The experiments are usually carried out in the laboratory which is also convenient for the experimenter. ...read more.


This puts a premium on the design and compilation of the questionnaire to be used so that questions are clear and unambiguous. This means giving careful thought to exactly what information is required; how to ask the appropriate questions to elicit that information and how to word the questionnaire that all recipients, who may cover a range of groups with variable educational attainments, understand what the question is asking. Such questionnaires are often best tested on a small pilot group, representative of the larger target group, to check that they are going to work well. This is all time consuming but unless such preparation is done, great problems can occur in trying to analyse and interpret the responses. There are limitations about what can usefully be covered in such non-experimental methods, for instance, people are not able to predict the future; interesting questions do not always give accuracy (Sherman, 1980) In some case studies, problems arise when trying to find appropriate participants, for example where a psychologist is interested in the effects of brain damage, it is only possible to study an individual patients, who already has brain damage due to a disease or serious accident, whereas it would be useful to have information about their capabilities before the disease or accident occurred. An example of this would be a patient known as HJA who sustained damage to certain areas of his brain as a result of a stroke. ...read more.


Trained psychologists are able to evoke behaviour in social setting, without actually invalidating the outcome. For example, an accomplice who requires help can be used and the response by individuals can be recorded. A black woman and a white woman were used in an experiment carried out by Bickman and Kamzan (1973) to see whether race was an issue when someone is asking for help (money), no racial differences were found. A real life social setting was used (a supermarket). This experiment was relatively easy to carry out and the results were easy to interpret. In conclusion, there are three main methods of investigation: experiments; surveys; and observations. They all have distinct advantages and disadvantages as described above. In identifying which method would be most appropriate in any particular case, psychologists would need to consider these factors and reach a judgement about which method would produce the most valuable and useful results, depending on what they are investigating. In some cases, it may be appropriate to use a combination of investigation methods, for example using a survey technique to gather data and then an experimental approach to test different hypotheses as to what cause and effect linkages there might be. It may also be, that in some circumstances, external factors, like time and money, dictate which method is to be used or which have to be eliminated. In such cases, it is important to recognise the limitations of the method adopted and consider how the disadvantages might need to be reflected in the design of the investigation or in the interpretation of the results. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    His father for instance observed little Hans' behaviour with his mother. He for example notes little Hans' desire to get into bed with both he and his mother. Self reporting comes from little Hans' reporting of his dreams, for example the dream in which he dreamt that he received a new penis and a new bottom.

  2. Research Methodology - Quantitative and Qualitative methods.

    that possible * Vulnerability to response bias * People adjust their responses to give the "right" answer rather than what they truly believe 6. Styles of questions * Agreement/disagreement (Likert scale) * Multiple choice * Open-ended � Administering Questionnaires / Surveys 1. FACE TO FACE ~ directly to person a.

  1. Conformity - psychologists view

    Explicit norms are written or spoken openly. Implicit norms are not openly stated (but you find out when you transgress them). Subjective norms, expectations that valued others have about how we will behave. Personal Norms, standards we have about our own actions.

  2. Free essay

    Explain methods used by psychologists to reduce prejudice - evaluate these methods.

    A key result the study was that mandatory cooperation was an essential ingredient to reduce prejudice and without it the level of prejudice is not reduced. However, further work by Worchel et al (1997) showed the when the common goal was not achieved the level of prejudice was typically elevated.

  1. There are a number of different research methods I can use for my primary ...

    Great care must also be taken when wording the questions so there is no bias, or words that some people may misinterpret or not understand. If this happens my results may not be as representative or accurate as they could be.

  2. Describe what psychologists know about leadership.

    However, by specifying one ideal leadership style, it departs from the behavioural viewpoint and takes a universal approach instead. Contingency theories of leadership examine the interaction between leader characteristics and elements of the work situation, arguing that effective leadership depends on the proper match between the two.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work