• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by the development and variety of attachment?

Extracts from this document...


What is meant by the development and variety of attachment? The term "attachment" is one which psychologists define as "a strong, long-lasting emotional tie to a particular individual". Although this definition is universally accepted, psychologists disagree about certain aspects of attachment. In this essay I aim to discuss the development and variety of attachments, and to outline the conclusions and disagreements of psychologists regarding these matters. Schaffer & Emerson's (1964) study into Glasgow babies was designed to find out about the development of attachments. The study involved keeping detailed records of their observations of babies from an area of Glasgow over 2 years. Infants were monitored every four weeks until the age of one year, and then again at 18 months. Schaffer & Emerson used two ways of measuring attachment: Separation Protest (the protest shown upon separation from an attachment figure) and Stranger Anxiety (the anxiety shown in the presence of a stranger). Both these factors are indicative of the formation of an attachment. The findings of Schaffer & Emerson were divided into four main points: Half of the children showed their first specific attachment between 6 and 8 months, and fear of strangers occurred about 1 month after; The intensity of attachment peaked during the first month that it was formed; Soon after the primary (first and most important) ...read more.


Type C infants also tend to ignore the stranger. In 1986, Main & Solomon identified a fourth type, or Type D attachment. These infants, labelled as Insecurely attached - disorganised show no set pattern of behaviour towards a caregiver. Wariness of the caregiver is sometimes shown, with infants moving towards the caregiver, but refusing to look at them: behaviour which is often associated with abused infants or those whose caregivers are severely depressed. The suggested causes of attachment can be grouped under two main headings: Infant temperament & Cultural differences. In 1982, Kagan developed the Temperament Hypothesis, which suggested that attachment varies according to certain innate or temperamental characteristics in a person. Kagan believed that some children are innately more vulnerable to stress than others, so the response of a child in the "strange situation" study will differ in accordance with their innate temperament. Research that corroborates this was conducted by Waters (1978), who found that newborns who are less able to attend people and objects are more likely to from insecure attachments. Further research was conducted by Belsky & Rovine (1987) who found that newborns who showed signs of behavioural instability (e.g. ...read more.


Bowlby asserted that there are four main topics involved in attachment: He believed that in order to form a strong emotional bond, a physical attachment is necessary, therefore proximity is vital. He also believed in monotrophy, or the innate tendency to become attached to one particular individual. Another of Bowlby's theories was that an infant's relationship with it's mother provided a template for all future relationships, and he called this the internal working model. His final theory was that a child's strong attachment to a mother figure is essential for their cognitive development. Although his theory of attachment was revolutionary, there is evidence to contrast some of it's points. In 1976, Lamb's study showed that children have no preference for their mother or father in an un-stressful situation, and Schaffer & Emerson's (1964) study provides evidence against monotrophy, as 30% of the children had multiple attachments. As you can see, there are many different aspects of both development and variety of attachment. Many theories about the development of attachments have appeared over the years, but it is very difficult to prove conclusively how attachments are formed, as things which are innate cannot be measured. However, I do believe that all the theories provide some insight into the way an attachment is formed, and the resultant effects of this attachment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Task1 Counselling 1aPhysical signs and symptoms of stress

    Or maybe over indulged at the Oral Stage and required different treatments. He would also suggest that the triplets needed unconditional love rather than a punitive, or institutionalised setting. Freud may also suggest that the triplets hated their parents out of jealously between children and not having the luxuries that

  2. Investigate the stages that infants go through when developing attachments.

    * Most of the research involved was American, and the categories of attachment were from an American point of view. This could make the study culture biased. Explanations/Theories of Attachment Learning theory The learning theory is linked to behaviourism. These psychologists believe that behaviour should be studied in a laboratory setting, which means that most research involves experiments.

  1. Attachment and Separation.

    Urquhart concludes that foster parents who are "unprepared or unsupported for the separation and loss experience can be considered foster parents at risk" of leaving foster care (p. 206). Emotional Factors To continue on in their work after the end of a placement, foster parents need to resolve their grief.

  2. Research into the development of attachments Study by Schaffer and Emerson (1964)

    In other words, many of the mothers were not the person who performed these tasks, and yet they were the main attachment objects. The researchers also concluded that most infants maintained at least one principal object of attachment in terms of intensity.

  1. Reactive Attachment Disorder

    They have often undergone changes in caregiver at critical times relative to the formation of a secure attachment orientation. When they are searching for a discriminate attachment figure from which to venture out to unfamiliar adults, they often do not have that secure base established.

  2. Infant's Attachments

    At reunion after brief separations in an unfamiliar environment, they mingle openly angry behavior with their attachment behavior" (Colin). "[This group of infants seem to be saying], 'Why do you do this? I need you desperately and yet you just leave me without warning.

  1. It has been established that human social development depends in a fundamental way on ...

    the child will get upset if their main care giver is out of sight. During this phase a child may also display a fear of strangers for the first time. The infant uses this person as a safe base from which to explore their environment and this is seen as proximity promoting giving way to proximity seeking.

  2. Developmental Psychology - Attachments. Ainsworth and Bell demonstrated that children show two main characteristics ...

    Western society (such as the US, which has a secure attachment of 71%, resistant 12% and avoidant 17%) has a much different view on how children should be brought up and how they should act. It is believed that in a healthy attachment, the child has a secure base, encouraging exploration and eventual individuation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work