• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which Source Is The More Useful As Evidence About The Start of The Children's Evacuation Journey?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1: Which Source Is The More Useful As Evidence About The Start of The Children's Evacuation Journey? By looking at both of the sources it is clear that both can be useful, though much depends on what you are trying to find out. Each source is very different, one is a picture taken as the event happened, the other a written account given long after the event. There are issues surrounding each and their usefulness and reliability. Source B has some obvious limitations, First of all we do not know why it was taken, was it government propaganda or simply a picture taken for a family photo album? Both would have very different implications. As propaganda was made in order to encourage parents to send their children away, the photo would only be taken if the children appeared to be happy, therefore it would not be an accurate representation of how the children were feeling. Even if this source was not apiece of propaganda it still only shows one moment in time, and you can only see a small proportion of the children's faces and as a result is very limited in its ability to represent all of the children evacuated across the country. ...read more.

Middle

is the audience of the source, in this case children and also the origin meaning what did the author base the events in the novel on, real events or made up ones. The first thing that is noticeable about the sources reliability is that it is a novel. Novels are written to make money and most of all entertain, therefore it is most likely that many of the events within it are made up or fake. Not only is it a novel but also it is a novel for children, because of this many real life events would have been taken out due to its upsetting nature. As a result of this it is not going to be as reliable as it could be. The novel was written in 1973, this is 24 years after the evacuations in 1939, and so as with source C events may not be remembered quite the same as they happened. However much of this depends on the sources from which the Author got her information. The source refers to two children, Carrie and her brother, the text 'She thinks we're poor children' suggests that most of the evacuees were thought to be from poor working class families. As a result of this the book breaks away from the stereotype evacuee, and shows it to be wrong. ...read more.

Conclusion

From the point of view of a host there were also many benefits, they would have an extra set of hands for work at harvest, which would also have an affect on the war effort, but also as I have already mentioned for many there were new friendships to be made. By looking at it from the governments point of view it also removed children from great peril, and saved many lives, this was great propaganda and was also made to appear like it was well organised. By removing children from the cities it allowed people to concentrate on what was most important to the government at this time, the war effort, Mums and Dads could now both work if they didn't already, as well as longer hours. Whilst on the other hand it could also be considered a failure. Many evacuees came from working class families in poor areas of overcrowded cities. Some had never been to the countryside before and had led a very different lifestyle from the families that they stayed with; this would obviously create friction, as I will look at in some sources further into the essay. Evacuees were often very unfamiliar with the way of life in the country, for instance some had never seen a cow. Boredom and homesickness was also a very common problem, this would inevitably lead to misbehaviour in many cases. Craig Jarvis 11 TH ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Is Homework Beneficial to Children in Any way?

    Although, from this problem stems another, parents are voicing the fact that even when they have got time to help their children with their homework they are unable to do so because of their own lack of knowledge on the subject.

  2. The evacuation of British Children - Which source is the more useful as evidence ...

    (' The mothers pressed against the iron gates calling "Good-bye darling"') It also tells us that the mothers weren't allowed to walk with the children to the station, they had to walk behind the group. It also tells us that the children where so scared that they couldn't speak, so therefore just murmured.

  1. Why do sources A to E differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    parents to evacuate their children by giving this positive view of evacuation. With showing all these smiling, happy children, the photograph may also make parents feel guilty about not evacuating their own and so is intended to encourage them to change their minds.

  2. Which source is more useful as evidence about the start of the children's evacuation ...

    For example it could be piece propaganda or a family photo, all it tells us it's a 'photograph taken in September 1939'. So all I know is it was taken in 1939, therefore it was taken in the middle of the war, so it has a high chance of being a piece propaganda.

  1. Which source is the more useful as evidence about the start of the children's ...

    This is what I mean by censorship and propaganda used by the government I believe that some of the information given by the teacher in his interview could have been incorrect.

  2. Evacuation- Comparing Source B and C

    The children had no idea where they where going at all, like stated in source C and where herded in large groups with their teachers, shown on source B. They where sent onto trains, leaving the children bewildered and fearful, as stated in source C.

  1. Report on Reading Dads Promotion at Leicester Prison

    Talk to Your Baby - this one hour session was delivered to 10 prisoners in the Learning and Skills Centre. Feedback from this session was very positive. Participants felt that the content was well presented and easy to understand. Most grasped the relevance of the content and felt it would be beneficial to themselves and their families.

  2. Study Sources B and C. Which source is the more useful as evidence about ...

    I found out that splitting up from your children was a really distressing time for everyone. The children wouldn't be happy about leaving there parents, they would be more likely to be crying and sad. So this feature of the snapshot is misleading and unreliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work