• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of children? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies.

Extracts from this document...


Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of children? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. There are a number of reasons why sources shows different attitudes. These may be related to the author of the source, when it was produced, and the purpose that the source has. Source A is a photograph of evacuees walking to a train station in London, ready to be evacuated. The author of the source is unknown. It was taken in September 1939, which is at the start of the war and when people were first evacuated out of the cities to the countryside, where they would be safer. It gives a positive attitude about the war .This photograph illustrates most of the children looking excited and happy as they are waving to the camera and smiling. Like in many cases, the children in the photograph probably didn't know exactly why they are being evacuated, and that is why they don't look upset. The children are not walking with their parents, some of them are on their own, probably because they have already been split up from their parents. Some children in the picture are accompanied by an adult who could be a parent or a minder. The picture displays that they are accompanied by what could be a teacher as she is leading them on and may be keeping them on the pavement; teachers were seen as a valuable asset and so were also evacuated to the countryside and accompanied the children. In the photograph the children are wearing tags and are carrying gas masks, which are necessities which they would require when being evacuated, and also some personal belongings. There is a man in the foreground of the photograph who is wearing a suit and tie and a hat. He may be an official from the government overseeing the evacuation process or he could be the head-teacher of the school in which the children are from. ...read more.


The source agrees with my own knowledge as I know that poor children were normally sent to stay with richer people, who often underestimated their situation. This is shown in the source when Miss Evans mistakes the children not having brought slippers with them as their being too poor to some. "Oh, I'm sorry, how silly of me, why should you have slippers?" She just thinks that because they had to be sent away from home that their family was too poor to keep them. This is also true to my knowledge, and perhaps the children being evacuated knew of this perception. It is true that there were indeed more poor children being sent away, but they were only poor in comparison to their host families. The poorest children that couldn't be evacuated inside Britain were put on boats and sent to safety overseas. The government weren't as concerned of the possibility that these children might not come back home, as at the end of the day, the richer families had more influence than the ones these children had come from, and reuniting them with their children would therefore be of higher priority than the reuniting the families that were poorer. The source gives a mixed attitude towards evacuation, it is both positive and negative. It's positive side is that the young girl Carrie has been evacuated along with her brother Nick, and also that it is quite a fun and light-hearted extract. This is recognisable at the end of the text where it says, 'Her brother Nick whispered "She thinks we're poor children, too poor to have slippers," and they giggled.' However, it is negative as it shows the children being labelled as "poor" by Miss Evans, and that they have been misconceived by their host. It was written as positive because this is probably how the children would have viewed it, as a big laugh and something fun. ...read more.


It portrays a very negative attitude to evacuation of children, based on his personal experiences of the process. The source is not very reliable as it has many limitations. For instance, the source is secondary, as it was made nearly 50 years after the events actually took place, and therefore some of the details may have been left out of the film due to memory loss in the period between the event and making the film. The film was a generalisation based on the director's own experiences, which were largely negative. It has been slightly sensationalised, with exaggerated scenes to maintain the audience's interest, and to make it a good film. However it is useful as Boorman grew up and experienced war in the East End of London, so we have first hand knowledge of what it was like to live there at the time, and the atmosphere between the people of London at the time. It is similar to Source C as both the sources are based on own knowledge and research, and are fictitious. It is different to Source A as Source A is positive, and this is quite a negative source, and due to the reason why it was published. In conclusion, Sources A to F show that all the authors had different opinions of evacuation depending on their position and views on it. As all the sources and authors are different, they are likely to show different attitudes, with varying degrees of positive and negative in the sources. However, these sources only represent a small proportion of the people that were involved in evacuation, and their views. Essentially, evacuation was different for everyone, and this is portrayed in the broad spread of attitudes in the 6 sources stated above. The people that were evacuated are likely to have their opinions of evacuation influenced by the host families that they stayed with. We can also see from these sources that attitudes differ depending on whether you were a child or adult at the time. ?? ?? ?? ?? Laura Parrish Candidate No. 1183 Centre No. 65217 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Using studies from the list below, answer the questions which follow: Rosenhan (sane in ...

    may be inaccurate since some imaging studies have used exactly the same imaging methodology employed in their study (e.g. Bauchsbaum et al 1990; Siegel et al 1993, DeLisi et al. 1989), whereas others have employed different methodologies (e.g. Baxter et al 1989; Volkow et al.

  2. I have decided to do my portfolio on Beaufort Park School, for several reasons. ...

    * How well is the school led and managed? The inspectors will focus on the management of performance, and will take into account the role of the governors, plus the schools own monitoring and evaluation. The following table sets out the criteria for most primary schools: Criteria thresholds Primary schools

  1. Psychology Cae Studies

    arrested and ended when they were finger printed and photographed, contributed to the prisoners internalising the prison. This occurred because of the shock value it signified a break from the prison (subjects) everyday reality they were arrested-they were now prisoners.

  2. Source evaluation on evacuation

    In principle children who lived in city areas, that were considered to be at risk from German bombing, were relocated to rural areas to live with foster families. We have looked through photographs, extracts from novels, newspapers, textbooks and interviews.

  1. To provide age/ability appropriate activities/experiences that will encourage the development of knowledge and understanding ...

    They are working amongst and along side each other talking at interacting as they work. " Children develop hand eye co ordination, as they usually concentrate carefully on what they are doing" (Tassoni P, 2000, P9) Communication skills will also be developed, as the children are working they will be talking to each other as well as talking to me.

  2. Is Homework Beneficial to Children in Any way?

    Taking into account, from these findings, how long this homework is realistically taking, if the children stopped anywhere near the time allocations that the government have recommended then the work would not be complete. The child would then most certainly be reprimanded and labelled as a deviant; a 'naughty boy/girl' when it came to handing in his incomplete homework.

  1. In Britain today, most people live in nuclear families - The aim of this ...

    All cultures organise and structure the relationships between men and women though which society as a whole reproduces itself, but there is great variation in the rights and duties associated with marriage in different societies. In many cultures, marriage is theoretically regarded as a permanent bond, dissoluble only through divorce, but marriage may also be a temporary arrangement.

  2. Do playgroups encourage gender stereotypes?

    I noticed this pattern in my observations- a large train set was set up on the floor and the leaders left it and only the boys went to play with it, without encouragement. I later saw a group of boys playing with a toy dinosaur set, and then a little girl went to join in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work