• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain's major cities, in the early years of WW2? On the 1st of September Britain declared war on Germany. This declaration started many fears and concerns for how people would live their lives, when they were surrounded by war. One of the main concerns was the safety, and the welfare of the children. The government started to evacuate children from London, Coventry, Southampton, Plymouth, and Liverpool. These concerns came because the Government feared that there would be heavy bombing on these major cities. This was because of the recent wars in Spain and the Far East, where towns and cities were attrociously bombed. The Government took precautions long before the war began. The countryside was where it was thought to be safer, so plans were being made to evacuate vulnerable people into 'foster' homes. Parents weren't so keen to send away they're loved ones, so government used propaganda such as leaflets, posters, and messages on the radio to make some parents realise how important evacuation was. People who were fortunate enough to have family and friends who live in the country, made their own arrangements to stay with them. Other people considered going to countries which weren't involved in the war, such as Canada and Australia. In the first year of the Second World War 800,000 school children were evacuated, as well as 550,000 mothers with children under 5. In 1940 evacuation reached a new level as German air raids arrived. ...read more.

Middle

It clearly shows that there were differences between the classes. These evacuees were also not able to have a source of comfort because they weren't allowed to take items that they wanted. Source D is another positive source. It is an advertisement issued by the government. It is emphasising that the children are thankful to their 'foster parents'. It is repeatedly praising the foster parents, saying how grateful everybody is. It implies that they knew it would be hard work looking after the children, and that's basically why they did it. We are not sure who the author is, and who it was intended for. It could be used as propaganda, seeing as the Government wrote it. It is one of only a few statements made by the government which the public has easy access to. This gives an insight into what the Governments point of view. It is commenting on how being evacuated into the countryside gives the children a 'fresh' start. The Government is probably pleased with evacuation because it was their idea. Maybe they are appealing for more foster parents, because they aren't getting enough, or some of the foster parents that have enrolled are backing out. This Source (source E) also has a negative attitude towards evacuation. It is an interview with the father of a seven-year-old boy. It is part of a mass survey. The interview is with one parent out of quite a few, as it is a mass survey. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also the host parents found that having children there with them helped them cope with the war. They were shocked by the poor health, and how dirty the children's clothes were, and what state they were in. Some evacuees were covered in lice or were very thin. Children repaid their hosts by helping on the farms in the country. On the same token, some of the host parents were unwilling to take children. They didn't treat them fairly because they didn't give them the right food, and they kept the benefit money for themselves (40p/ eight shillings). Becoming a host parent came along with many problems. When the evacuees reached their designated area, they found that they weren't meant to be there. Villages expecting young children received hundreds of pregnant women. Some hosts found it difficult to deal with children who did not behave like their own. Many host families were short of money because when the price of food rose, their benefit pay didn't. It is hard to comment on whether I thought evacuation was a great success or not. There are too many different sides to the story. Some say that the host parents didn't care for the children properly, and some say that the health of the children did improve. I think that evacuation was not a success in the early stages of the war. This is because the children were taken away from their homes when there was no apparent need. As the war progressed, I think that the process was a success because the children needed to be taken away from the danger areas. ?? ?? ?? ?? Scott McBride Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. The evacuation of British Children - Which source is the more useful as evidence ...

    This included 827,000 schoolchildren, 524,000 mothers and children under school age, 13,000 expectant mothers, 103,000 teachers and 7,000 handicapped people. But was this a success? To help me answer that question I have decided to anayls some for of evidence given to me in sources.

  2. In response to growing tension and technological advances in war, the British government set ...

    On top of this there was a shortage of books, supplies and personal attention from teachers (due to army recruitment). (Gosden,80) The information can be partly explained by the loss of school medics. Before the war schoolchildren were required to have a full medical examination, but during the war, the

  1. I have decided to do my portfolio on Beaufort Park School, for several reasons. ...

    as, staff absences, but does not include maternity/paternity leave, or jury service. * Provision of central support service Beaufort Park School interacts with many services, as well as community services: * Doctor/dentist/optician: the doctor, optician and dentist will phone up the school and make an arrangement to come and do a basic check up on the children.

  2. Why do sources A to E differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    This source may furthermore not be reliable because the photograph could have been staged, for instance it does not say who took the photograph. For example, it would probably have been the first time that the children, who are from the city and attend a local school, would have been

  1. The Home Front: Evacuation

    from the start; perhaps because they didn't vote for Winston Churchill, or for another reason, but they simply do not like the idea that they are relying on the Government; as if they are going to be called upon one day to pay their debt back.

  2. Evacuation Sources Questions

    in 1988, and the person could very well have forgotten some of the details of the evacuation, and therefore their memory of the event could be unreliable. However this might not be the case, and therefore it could be quite reliable.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The source is useful because it gives an insight on what it may have been like for the children and what their attitudes towards evacuation were; such as what their feelings and emotions may have been.

  2. "Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain's major cities in ...

    Perhaps the main fact that led to the Prime Minister's decision on evacuation was the fact that the predicted casualty figures were so high. The Government knew that the war in the air was hard to stop, so they wanted to secure a future for England if the cities of Britain did fall.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work