• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“People should always do their duty”. Explain how Kant understood this concept.

Extracts from this document...


Kant and the categorical imperative Q: "people should always do their duty". Explain how Kant understood this concept. Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth century German philosopher, who lived all of his life in the town of Konigsberg, East Prussia. Kant belied that the only way we can make selfless, rational moral decisions is by acting out of a sense of duty. Kant was troubled by the apparent inconsistency between the findings if the physical sciences in his day, and that of the accepted moral and religious attitudes and doctrines of his contempories. What particularly concerned Kant was the fact that everything that occurred in the natural sciences could be explained by the use of strict laws, whereas human beings appeared to behave in a relatively chaotic and unpredictable manor when faced with moral decisions. Kant believed this to be a contradiction that had to be resolved, and subsequently started work on a deontological, universal moral theory defined by him as "the categorical imperative", something that he believed should underpin all moral decision-making Kant starts his argument by making a distinction between a posteriori statements and a priori statements. ...read more.


A categorical imperative, Kant holds, is one that is an end in itself and takes the form "do x". It is a call to duty, an action done for its own sake. Kant then introduces the idea that we should act as lawmakers when making moral decisions; "act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law". What Kant means by this is that we should only perform a moral action if we are willing for that action to become a universal law for everybody to follow. Kant then introduces the practical imperative, which in summary runs as follows: " Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end". Kant believed that a person with a good will is someone who acts wholly rationally, someone who disregards their selfish inclinations and acts out of a sense of duty in accordance with the categorical imperative. ...read more.


It may be argued that no direct contradiction would result from the universalization of such law and thus we would have no perfect duty to avoid acting in such a way. However, it may be argued that no rational person could consistently will that it became a universal law, as there is always the chance of the mother obtaining the financial means. If this were accepted, then we would have an imperfect duty not to act in this way. However, if the act of abortion is regarded as killing, then the resulting duty may change. Killing other human beings, Kant would argue, is clearly contradictory, and thus we have a perfect moral duty not to do it. Referring back to the previous example, the new maxim would become "it is permissible to kill someone if you do not have the financial means to support them". Because the maxim of "killing" has already been established to be self contradictory (if universalised), then the maxim of killing someone because you cannot financially support them would also be considered contradictory, and we would therefore have a perfect moral duty not to do it. Once established, the duties arrived at under the categorical imperative are absolute. However, as can be seen, establishing what are duties are is not always straightforward. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    A Scottish philosopher called David Hume said "By liberty, then, we can only mean a power of acting or not acting, according to the determinations of the will: that is, if we choose to remain at rest; we may; if we chose to move, we also may."

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    Kant's ethical theory can be defined as deontological. This means looking at the morality of an action itself, rather than considering the consequences. It can be difficult to apply this concept to practical situations. In one essay, Kant said that it would be wrong to lie, even to a murderer

  1. 'Duty should be done, simply because it is duty.' Explain how Kant analysed this ...

    He believed that moral statements are a priori synthetic because ethical knowledge comes from pure reason (rather than empirical evidence), but may also be right or wrong. Kant noted that people are aware of a moral law at work within them.

  2. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    His motive for acting in the way that he does is, therefore, pure. It is unconditional. He does not do it in order to get increased trade but simply because he thinks that he ought so to act. Two things need to be said.

  1. Kantian Ethics and Universal Maxims

    "Kant's understanding of universal maxims cannot be defended" Discuss. Kant's universal maxims can be defended in the way it sees people as equal, which is the main aim of every human regardless of colour, race, and religion.

  2. A. Explain what Kant meant by the categorical argument. B. Asses Kant's claims critically ...

    According to Kantian ethics there are universal moral laws, which we must follow. There are many problems with this, and first I feel that Kant is trying to place a one-dimensional theory of ethics on a three-dimensional world full of unexpected incidents.

  1. The concept of hell makes no sense discuss

    (John 14:6). This would mean a relatively small number of the population are to be saved. Exclusivist Christians follow a similar view to fundamentalists although exclusivist Christians are much stricter in there views. They believe anyone who doesn't follow the Bible would be sent to Hell.

  2. The use of the Categorical Imperative makes no room for compassionate treatment of women ...

    and so would have to give both t make the baby an end rather than a means. Again, this would largely depend on whether the foetus was a human or not and, as I stated previously, it would be very difficult to universally decide about this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work