• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“Without real freedom there would be no ethical decisions to make,” Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Without real freedom there would be no ethical decisions to make," Discuss. In making ethical decisions you are exercising an ability to make moral judgements and take moral responsibility. How does freedom tie in with this? Does an action have to be undertaken freely for you to be morally responsible for it? If an action is taken intentionally and consciously then surely he who took the action is responsible for the consequences of the action. So long as action was taken as a choice between various other actions and was a deliberate choice then the agent is accountable for the choice he made. If we can describe the action as being either right or wrong or good or bad then we assume that the agent took these factors into account when choosing to act. This shows that he had the capacity for deliberate choice, and acted freely towards his intentions. It was because he acted freely that he became responsible for the act and because he chose to act in that way when he was faced with a number of other choices he accepted his own free will as an autonomous moral agent. If an action is performed unintentionally or against will, then surely the agent is not responsible for the consequences? He did not have the freedom to decide and was unable to choose his actions and so, a difference is specified between voluntary actions and involuntary actions. Voluntary actions are those done through the initiative of the agent out of free will and choice, whereas involuntary actions are carried out through coercion or taken without knowing the consequences of the act i.e. ...read more.

Middle

set and what we feel we decide is irrelevant to anything that actually happens, Johns Locke's locked room scenario[3][3] is an example of this. The man decides but ultimately his decision is inconsequential. We appear to have decisions to make we can claim no responsibility for. If an ethical choice is one that carries moral consequence it will require moral deliberation and carry some form of moral responsibility. Determinism removes this moral responsibility and so removes ethical decisions. If a freedom which makes human free-will relevant doesn't exist, making ethical choices is impossible. Imcompatibilists realise that determinism creates a situation where free will is obsolete and see an incompatibility between hard determinism and moral responsibility. Because of this, they would argue that universal causation is not necessarily relevant to human actions. They do not deny any influence to the human mind that could have an effect on the way in which one might act, but they claim that there is still a large aspect of freedom of choice involved. John Locke's scenario can argue as well for this idea as it can for the concept of determinism which it was intended. In the situation the outcome is set by means of the door being locked, but the human is still able make the choice between option A or B whether he is able to act on it or not. The arguments Libertarianists give for the existence of human free will are largely based on the defined different between ones personality/psychological self and ones moral self. ...read more.

Conclusion

If this is the case then the question uses simple tortology to suggest that, what we say is the ability to make ethical decisions (freedom), is needed to make ethical decisions, and without it we can't. _______________________ [6][1] J.L.Mackie Ethics Inventing Right and Wrong (Penguin 1977) Page208 [7][2] The theory of universal causation. [8][3] Locked room scenario- A sleeping man is placed in a room with a locked door. When he wake he consciously decide to remain in the room and make no attempt to leave, not knowing that The door is locked. It is a decision made by him and he could have decided to try and leave. In reality he has no choice, he only believes he has a choice because he is ignorant to the truth-This scenario fails to cover the fact that the mans decision to stay was merely convenient and if he had actually decided to leave the chain of events, if only mentally, would have been different. The hard determinist view point would surely be that his decision to stay in the room would be pre determined by previous events and the fact that the door was locked would be irrelevant. [9][4] Theories based on Freudian ideas suggest that "behaviour is wholly determined by the unconscious parts of our minds". The conscious part of our mind has very little to do with the way we operate and essentially we are not in control. This would be a strong argument for determinism but there is little evidence to suggest it should be the case and at present is obsolete. ((Quote from J.L. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. We are free to make ethical decisions, discuss

    If no one deserves punishment then equally no one should be deserving of praise, because we do not choose to be good, or bad, it is predetermined through our genes and our upbringing whether we will be a good person or not.

  2. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    It does not commit itself to any of these views ("determinism is true", or "we have free will"), it only states that they are compatible. The view that both statements are true is called "soft determinism". The incompatibilist view is that both statements cannot be true; hence an incompatibilist would either be a hard determinist or a libertarian.

  1. God Knows the ethical decisions we will make. Discuss

    He chooses to stay in the room, believing he has chosen freely. In reality, he has no option. However, his ignorance of this gives him an illusion of freedom. Although with hard determinism there is an issue raised about accountability and moral responsibility.

  2. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    in debate and analysis of moral issues before being presented with ethical decisions are more likely to act morally when encountering them. However, both these views of conscience could present the conscience as an innate capacity of human nature, even thought it is acquired.

  1. The key difference between someone using counselling skills and a qualified and trained counsellor ...

    this may result in substantial compensation being awarded to client should they be successful in their case. All counsellors should therefore ensure that they hold Public Liability Insurance to protect them from any legal action which may be pursued. Criteria 5 Safety It is necessary to ensure that the environment

  2. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    Hard determinism preserves that all actions have a prior cause; humans aren't free to act at all. Our actions are determined by a complex set of prior causes. An excellent quote for this was written by Volitaire, in his Dictionaire Philosophique (1764)

  1. Discuss the view that few business make truly moral decisions and that most implement ...

    Critics of ethical codes believe them purely to be public relations exercises rather than genuine attempts to change behaviour. It is argued that most businesses produce an ethical code to project a good public image whilst their underlying business culture remains unchanged.

  2. Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

    The incompatibility between this position and hard determinism results in the assumption that it is unreasonable to hold people responsible for what they do. Praise and blame become redundant. Between these two extremes, stands Compatibilism. Classic Compatilists such as John Locke endorsed the idea of freedom and Liberty.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work